Temporal variation in the abundance of Orchid Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a Neotropical Hygrophilous Forest

Authors

  • Maurício Meirelles do Nascimento Castro Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto - USP
  • Carlos Alberto Garófalo Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto - USP
  • José Carlos Serrano Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto - USP
  • Cláudia Inês Silva Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto - USP Universidade Federal do Ceará

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v60i4.405-412

Keywords:

richness, abundance, Euglossini, chemical baits, temporal fluctuation

Abstract

Although bees are important pollinators in several ecosystems around the world, studies on bee diversity in hygrophilous forests are scarce. This type of vegetation is restricted to permanently wet soils and, therefore, has particular floristic, structure and physiognomy. The goal of the present study was to inventory and analyze the temporal variation of the euglossine bees that occur in a neotropical hygrophilous forest. In order to sample male bees we used four chemical baits, eucalyptol, eugenol, vanillin, and methyl salicylate. The captures were made once a month, from March 2010 to February 2011, from 9:00 am to 12:00 pm. We captured 113 individuals of three genera and five species (in decreasing order of abundance): Eulaema nigrita Lepeletier, 1841 (n=52), Euglossa pleosticta Dressler, 1982 (34), Exaerete smaragdina (Guérin-Méneville, 1844) (12), Euglossa carolina Nemésio, 2009 (11), and Euglossa fimbriata Rebêlo & Moure, 1968 (4). The most attractive bait was eucalyptol (n=98), followed by vanillin (11), and eugenol (4). Both temperature and rainfall affected significantly the distribution of the number of males throughout the year. The highest number of Euglossini species and individuals was sampled in the warm and rainy season, with activity peaks varying among species.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamczyk, S., Gottleuber, P., Matauschek, C. & Kessler, M. (2011). Diversity and community composition of euglossine bee assemblages (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in western Amazonia. Biodivers. Conserv., 20(13): 2981-3001. doi: 10.1007/s10531-011-0105-1

Ackerman, J.D. (1983). Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 20: 301-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1983.tb01878.x

Ackerman, J.D. (1989). Geographic and seasonal-variation in fragrance choices and preferences of male euglossine bees. Biotropica, 21(4): 340-347. doi: 10.2307/2388284

W.M. Aguiar & Gaglianone M.C. (2008). Comunidade de Abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em Remanescentes de Mata Estacional Semidecidual sobre Tabuleiro no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Neotrop. Entomol., 37(2): 118-125. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2008000200002

Alvarenga, P.E.F., Freitas, R.F. & Augusto, S.C. (2007). Diversidade de Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em áreas de cerrado do Triângulo Mineiro, MG. Biosci. J., 23(suppl. 1): 30-37.

Brosi, B.J. (2009). The effects of forest fragmentation on euglossine bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini). Biol. Conserv., 142(2): 414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.003

Cordeiro, G.D., Boff, S., Caetano, T.A., Fernandes, P.C. & Alves-dos-Santos, I. (2013). Euglossine bees (Apidae) in Atlantic forest areas of São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil. Apidologie, 44(3): 254-267. doi: 10.1007/s13592-012-0176-3

Cruz Landim, C., Stort, A.C., Costa Cruz, M.A. & Kitajima, E.W. (1965). Órgão tibial dos machos de Euglossini. Estudo ao microscópio óptico e eletrônico. Rev. Bras. Biol., 25(4): 323-342.

Dressler, R.L. (1982). Biology of the orchid bee (Euglossini). Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 13: 373-394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002105

Eltz, T., Zimmermann, Y., Haftmann, J., Twele, R., Francke, W., Quezada-Euan, J.J.G. & Lunau, K. (2007). Eufleurage, lipid recycling and the origin of perfume collection in orchid bees. Proc. R. Soc. B., 274(1627): 2843–2848. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0727

Garófalo, C.A., Camillo, E., Serrano, J.C. & Rebêlo, J.M.M. (1993). Utilization of trap nests by Euglossini species (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Rev. Bras. Biol., 53(2): 177-187.

Gomes, P.B., Válio, I.F.M. & Martins, F.R. (2006). Germination of Geonoma brevispatha (Arecaceae) in laboratory and its relation to the palm spatial distribution in a swamp forest. Aquat. Bot., 85(1): 16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.01.008

Hirotsu, C.M., Nascimento, A.L.O. & Garófalo, C.A. (2010). Levantamento das espécies de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) da Gleba Cerrado Pé-de-Gigante, do Parque Estadual de Vassununga, Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP. In Z. L. P. Simões, D. S. M. Antonio & M. M. G. Bitondi (Eds.), Anais do IX Encontro sobre Abelhas: Genética e Biologia Evolutiva de Abelhas (pp. 494). Ribeirão Preto: FUNPEC.

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. & Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analyses. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1): 9pp.

Hutcheson, K. (1970). A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. J. Theor. Biol., 29(1): 151-154. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4

Janzen, D.H., Devries, P.J., Higgins, M.L. & Kimsey, L.S. (1982). Seasonal and site variation in Costa Rica euglossine bees at chemical baits in lowland deciduous and evergreen forests. Ecology, 63(1): 66-74. doi: 10.2307/1937032

Jesus, B.M.V. & Garófalo, C.A. (2000). Riqueza e abundância sazonal de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) na Mata da Virgínia, Matão, São Paulo. In M.M.G. Bitondi, K. Hartfelder et al. (Eds.), Anais do IV Encontro sobre Abelhas (pp.239–245). Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras/ Departamento de Biologia/ USP

Joly, C.A. (1992). Biodiversity of gallery forest and its role in soil stability in the Jacaré-Pepira water, state of São Paulo, Brazil. In A. Jensen (Ed.), Ecotones at the river basin scale global land/water interactions. Proceedings of ecotones regional workshop (pp. 40-66). Barmera: UNESCO/MAB.

Knoll, F.R.N. & Penatti, N.C. (2012). Habitat fragmentation effects on the orchid bee communities in remnant forests of southeastern Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 41(5): 355-365. doi: 10.1007/s13744-012-0057-5

Kovach Computing Services. (2012). Oriana for Windows (version 4.01). Anglesey, Wales.

Leitão Filho, H.F. (1982). Aspectos taxonômicos das florestas do estado de São Paulo. Silvicultura em São Paulo, 16A(1): 197-206.

Lopez, F.D. (1963). Two attractants for Eulaema tropica L. J. Econ. Entomol., 56(4): 540.

Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 256 p

Marques, M.C.M. (1994). Estudos auto-ecológicos do guanandi (Calophyllum brasiliense Camb. Clusiaceae) em uma mata ciliar do município de Brotas, SP. Master Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brasil.

Milet-Pinheiro, P. & Schlindwein, C. (2005). Do euglossine males (Apidae, Euglossini) leave tropical rainforest to collect fragrances in sugarcane monocultures? Rev. Bras. Zool., 22(4): 853-858. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81752005000400008

Minckley, R.L. & Reyes, S.G. (1996). Capture of the orchid bee, Eulaema polychroma (Friese) (Apidae: Euglossini) in Arizona, with notes on northern distributions of other Mesoamerican bees. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 69(1): 102-104.

Morellato, L.P.C., Talora, D.C., Takahasi, A., Bencke, C.C., Romera, E.C. & Zipparro, V.B. (2000). Phenology of Atlantic rain forest trees: A comparative study. Biotropica, 32(4b): 811-823. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00620.x

Nemésio, A. & Silveira, F.A. (2007). Orchid bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossina) of Atlantic forest fragments inside an urban area in southeastern Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 36(2): 186-191. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2007000200003

Neves, E.L. & Viana, B.F. (1999). Comunidade de machos de Euglossinae (Hymenoptera: Apidae) das matas ciliares da margem esquerda do médio Rio São Francisco, Bahia. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras., 28(2): 201-210. doi: 10.1590/S0301-80591999000200002

Pearson, D.L. & Dressler, R.L. (1985). Two-year study of male orchid bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) attraction to chemical baits in lowland south-eastern Peru. J Trop Ecol 1: 37-54.

R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 2.15.2 ). Vienna, Austria.

Ramalho, A.V., Gaglianone, M.C. & Oliveira, M.L. (2009). Comunidades de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica no Sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Bras. entomol., 53(1): 95-101. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262009000100022

Rebêlo, J.M.M. & Cabral, A.J.M. (1997). Abelhas Euglossinae de Barreirinhas, zona do litoral da Baixada Oriental Maranhense. Acta Amaz., 27(2): 145-152.

Rebêlo, J.M.M. & Garófalo, C.A. (1991). Diversidade e sazonalidade de machos de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) e preferencias por iscas-odores em um fragmento de floresta no sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Biol., 51(4): 787-799.

Rebêlo, J.M.M. & Garófalo, C.A. (1997). Comunidades de machos de Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em matas semidecíduas do nordeste do estado de São Paulo. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras., 26(2): 243-255. doi: 10.1590/S0301-80591997000200005

Rebêlo, J.M.M. (2001). História natural das Euglossíneas: as abelhas das orquídeas. São Luís: Lithograf.

Rocha-Filho, L.C. & Garófalo, C.A. (2013). Phenological Patterns and Preferences for Aromatic Compounds by Male Euglossine Bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in Two Coastal Ecosystems of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotrop. Entomol., doi: 10.1007/s13744-013-0173-x

Rocha-Filho, L.C., Krug, C., Silva, C.I. & Garófalo, C.A. (2012). Floral Resources Used by Euglossini Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Coastal Ecosystems of the Atlantic Forest. Psyche 2012: 13 pages. doi: 10.1155/2012/934951

Rodrigues, R.R. (2004). Uma discussão nomenclatural das Formações Ciliares. In R. R. Rodrigues & H. F. Leitão-Filho (Eds.), Matas ciliares: conservação e recuperação (pp. 91-99). São Paulo: Edusp/ Fapesp.

Roubik, D.W. & Hanson, P.E. (2004). Orchid bees of tropical America: biology and field guide. San Jose: INBIO.

Silva, C.I., Bordon, N.G., Rocha Filho, L.C. & Garófalo, C.A. (2012). The importance of plant diversity in maintaining the pollinator bee, Eulaema nigrita (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in sweet passion fruit fields. Rev. Biol. Trop., 60(4): 1553-1565.

Silva, F.S. (2012). Orchid bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) community from a gallery forest in the Brazilian Cerrado. Rev. Biol. Trop., 60(2): 625-633.

Silveira, G.C., Nascimento, A.M., Sofia, S.H. & Augusto, S.C. (2011). Diversity of the euglossine bee community (Hymenoptera, Apidae) of an Atlantic Forest remnant in southeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. entomol., 55(1): 109-115. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262011000100017

Sofia, S.H. & Suzuki, K.A. (2004). Comunidade de machos de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em fragmentos florestais no sul do Brasil. Neotrop. Entomol., 33(6): 693-702. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2004000600006

Sørensen T. (1948). A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. 5: 1–34.

Storck-Tonon, D., Morato, E.F., Melo, A.W.F. & Oliveira, M.L. (2013). Orchid Bees of forest fragments in Southwestern Amazonia. Biota Neotrop. 13(1): 133-141. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032013000100015

Teixeira, A.D.P., Assis, M.A., Siqueira, F.R. & Casagrande, J.C. (2008). Tree species composition and environmental relationships in a Neotropical swamp forest in Southeastern Brazil. Wetlands Ecol. Manage., 16(6): 451-461. doi: 10.1007/s11273-008-9082-x

Toniato, M.T.Z., Leitão Filho, H.F. & Rodrigues, R.R. (1998). Fitossociologia de um remanescente de floresta higrófila (mata de brejo) em Campinas, SP. Rev. bras. Bot., 21(2): 197-210. doi: 10.1590/S0100-84041998000200012

Torres, R.B., Matthes, L.A.F. & Rodrigues, R.R. (1994). Florística e estrutura do componente arbóreo de mata de brejo em Campinas, SP. Rev. bras. Bot., 17(2): 189-194.

Whitten, W.M., Young, A.M. & Stern, D.L. (1993). Nonfloral sources of chemicals that attract male euglossine bees (Apidae, Euglossini). J. Chem. Ecol., 19(12): 3017-3027. doi: 10.1007/bf00980599

Zar, J.H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4 edn.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 736 p

Zimmermann, Y., Ramirez, S.R. & Eltz, T. (2009). Chemical niche differentiation among sympatric species of orchid bees. Ecology, 90(11): 2994-3008. doi: 10.1890/08-1858.1

Zimmermann, Y., Roubik, D.W. & Eltz, T. (2006). Species-specific attraction to pheromonal analogues in orchid bees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 60(6): 833-843. doi: 10.1007/s00265-006-0227-8

Downloads

Published

2013-12-30

How to Cite

Castro, M. M. do N., Garófalo, C. A., Serrano, J. C., & Silva, C. I. (2013). Temporal variation in the abundance of Orchid Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a Neotropical Hygrophilous Forest. Sociobiology, 60(4), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v60i4.405-412

Issue

Vol. 60 No. 4 (2013)

Section

Research Article - Bees

License

Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)