Floral Resources Partitioning by Two Co-occurring Eusocial Bees in an Afromontane Landscape

Robert Tropek, Eliska Padysakova, Eliska Padysakova, Stepan Janecek, Stepan Janecek

Abstract


Floral preferences of generalist foragers such as eusocial bees influence the success of pollination of many flowering plants, as well as competition with many other bee species in tropical communities. Eusocial bees are important for the pollination success of many flowering plants, as well as for food resources availability for many other species. However, their foraging preferences are still unknown in many tropical areas, especially in the Afrotropics. We studied the foraging activity of two syntopic eusocial bees with large colonies, the honeybee Apis mellifera Linnaeus and the stingless bee Meliplebeia ogouensis (Vachal), on seven plant species in the Bamenda Highlands, Cameroon, in two consecutive years. Simultaneously, we quantified intra- and inter-annual changes in the food resources. We observed resource partitioning among the two bee species. Although both species are considered as generalists, their short-term food niches overlap was very low. Their preferences to the most often visited plants differed even more strongly interannually. Our results bring the first evidence on such relatively strong resource partitioning among two dominant eusocial bee species from West/Central Africa.


Keywords


Apinae, Apis mellifera; honeybee; stingless bees; interspecific interactions; pollination

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguiar, C.M.L., Caramés, J., França, F. & Melo, E. (2017) Exploitation of floral resources and niche overlap within an oil-collecting bee guild (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a Neotropical savanna. Sociobiology 64: 78-84. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i1.1250

Bartoš, M., Janeček, Š., Padyšáková, E., Patáčová, E., Altman, J., Pešata, M., Kantorová, J. & Tropek, R. (2012). Nectar properties of the sunbird-pollinated plant Impatiens sakeriana: a comparison with six other co-flowering species. South African Journal of Botany 786: 3-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2011.05.015

Bartoš, M., Tropek, R., Spitzer, L., Padyšáková, E., Janšta, P., Straka, J., Tkoč, M. & Janeček, Š. (2015). Specialization of pollination systems of two co-flowering phenotypically generalized Hypericum species (Hypericaceae) in Cameroon. Arthropod Plant Interactions 9: 241–252. doi: 10.1007/s11829-015-9378-8

Franco, E.L., Aguiar, C.M.L., Ferreira, V.S. & Oliveira-Reboucas, P.L. (2009). Plant use and niche overlap between the introduced honey bee (Apis mellifera) and the native bumblebee (Bombus atratus). Sociobiology 53: 141-150.

Hilgert-Moreira, S.B., Nascher, C.A., Callegari-Jacques, S.M. & Blochtein, B. (2014). Pollen resources and trophic niche breadth of Apis mellifera and Melipona obscurior (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a subtropical climate in the Atlantic rain forest of southern Brazil. Apidologie 45: 129-141. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0234-5

Liu, Y.J., Zhao, T.R., Zhang, X.W., Liang, C. & Zhao, F.Y. (2013). Melittopalynology and trophic niche analysis of Apis cerana and Apis mellifera in Yunnan Province of Southwest China. Sociobiology 60: 289-294. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v60i3.289-294

Janeček, Š., Riegert, J., Bartoš, M., Hořák, D., Reif, J., Padyšáková, E., Fajnová, D., Antzcak, M., Pešata, M., Mikeš, V., Patáčová, E., Altman, J., Kantorová, J., Hrázský, Z., Brom, J. & Doležal J. (2012). Food selection by avian floral visitors: an important aspect of plant-flower interactions in West Africa. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 107: 355-367. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01943.x

Kajobe, R. (2007). Pollen foraging by Apis mellifera and stingless bees Meliponula bocandei and Meliponula nebulata in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 45: 265-274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00701.x

Leonhardt, S.D., Heard, T.A. & Wallace, H. (2014). Differences in the resource intake of two sympatric Australian stingless bee species. Apidologie 45(4): 514-527. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0266-x

Padyšáková, E., Bartoš, M., Tropek, R. & Janeček, Š. (2013). Generalization versus specialization in pollination systems: Visitors, thieves, and pollinators of Hypoestes aristata (Acanthaceae). PLoS ONE 8: e59299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059299

Pedro, S.D.M. & Camargo, J.D. (1991). Interactions on floral resources between the Africanized honey bee Apis mellifera L. and the native bee community (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in a natural “cerrado” ecosystem in southeast Brazil. Apidologie 22(4): 397-415. doi: 10.1051/apido:19910405

R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.15.0. R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria

Ramalho, M., Silva, M.D. & Catvalho, C.A.L. (2007). Dinâmica de uso de fontes de pólen por Melipona scutellaris Latreille (Hymenoptera, Apidae): Uma análise comparativa com Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae), no Domínio Tropical Atlântico. Neotropical Entomology, 36: 3845-2007. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2007000100005

Sommeijer, M.J., De Rooy, G.A., Punt, W. & De Bruijn, L.L.M. (1983). A comparative study of foraging behavior and pollen resources of various stingless bees (Hym., Meliponinae) and honeybees (Hym., Apinae) in Trinidad, West-Indies. Apidologie 14(3): 205-224. doi: 10.1051/apido:19830306

Schoener, T.W. (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in complex fauna. Ecology 49: 704-726. doi: 10.2307/1935534

Thomson, D. (2004). Competitive interactions between the invasive European honey bee and native bumble bees. Ecology 85(2): 458-470. doi: 10.1890/02-0626

Tropek, R. & Konvička, M. (2010). Forest eternal? Endemic butterflies of the Bamenda highlands, Cameroon, avoid close-canopy forest. African Journal of Ecology 48: 428-437. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2009.01129.x

Whitfield, C.W., Behura, S.K., Berlocher, S.H., Clark, A.G., Johnston, J.S., Sheppard, W.S., Smith, D.R., Suarez, A.V., Weaver, D. & Tsutsui, N.D. (2006). Thrice out of Africa: ancient and recent expansions of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Science 314: 642-645. doi: 10.1126/science.1132772




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2824

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JCR Impact Factor 2016: 0.699