Invasive Ants Affect Spatial Distribution Pattern and Diversity of Arboreal Ant Communities in Fruit Plantations, in Tarakan Island, Borneo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v66i4.3743Keywords:
ants, plantation, invasive species, ant mosaic, species segregationAbstract
Human activities influence ant community structure. In tropical areas, the habitat characteristics of crop plantations frequently shape the structure of arboreal ant communities. The present study investigated the spatial distribution of arboreal ants dwelling in durian Durio zibethinus and citrus Citrus amblycarpa plantations in the Tarakan Island, North Kalimantan. Specifically, it was investigated whether ant communities are dominated by native or invasive species; and if ant arboreal mosaics occur. This study included two sites (A and C) comprising durian and citrus plantations and one site B with only citrus plantations. Ant workers dwelling on crop trees were collected by branch beating, and subsequently identified and counted. Across all sites, a total of 64,360 workers, from 22 ant species, were collected from 59 durian and 63 citrus trees. In site A, the invasive species Tapinoma melanocephalum and the native species Oecophylla smaragdina were numerically dominant. A null model analysis of species co-occurrence revealed that species segregation existed in this site. Conversely, in sites B and C the invasive species T. melanocephalum and Technomyrmex albipes were dominant, and native arboreal ants almost co-occurred with the two species. Moreover, the number of T. melanocephalum and T. albipes workers was negatively correlated with the species diversity index of arboreal ants. However, the number of O. smaragdina workers showed no significant correlation. The results suggest that the invasion and domination of non-native species dissasemble spatial structures and reduce the species diversity in arboreal ant communities. The community structures of arboreal ants in fruit plantations were varied, depending on the fruit species and the properties of dominant ants.
Downloads
References
Adams, B.J., Schnitzer, S.A., & Yanoviak, S.P. (2017). Tree is islands: canopy ant species richness increase with the size of liana-free trees in a Neotropical forest. Ecography, 40: 1067-1075. doi: 10.1111/ecog.02608.
Albrecht, M. & Gotelli, N.J. (2001). Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia, 126: 134-141. doi: 10.1007/s004420000494.
Antmaps.org. 2017. Available from https://antmaps.org (accessed December 2017).
AntWeb.org. 2017. Available from https://www.antweb.org (accessed August-September 2017).
Appiah, E. F., Ekesia, S., Afreh-Nuamah, K., Obeng-Ofori, D. & Mohamed, S. A. (2014). African weaver ant-produced semiochemicals impact on foraging behavior and parasitism by the Opiine parasitoid, Fopiusa risanus on Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biological Control, 79: 49-57. doi: 10.3390/insects7010001.
Asfiya, W., Lach, L., Majer, J.D., Heterick, B. & Didham, R.K. (2015). Intensive agroforestry practices negatively affect ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) diversity and composition in southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian Myrmecology, 7: 87-104. doi: 10.20362/am.007009.
Blüthgen, N. & Stork, N.E. (2007). Ant mosaics in a tropical rainforest in Australia and elsewhere: a critical review. Austral Ecology, 32: 93-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01744.x
Bolton, B. (1997). Identification guide to the ant genera of the world: Harvard Univ Pr, London.
Castracani, C., Maistrello, L., Bulgarini. G., Mori, A., Giannetti, G., Grasso, G.A. & Spotti, F.A. (2017). Predatory ability of the ant Crematogaster scutellaris on the brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys. Journal of Pest Science, 90: 1181-1190. doi: 10.1007/s10340-017-0889-1.
Davidson, D.W., Cook, S.C., Snelling, R.R. & Chua, T.H. (2003). Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science, 300: 969-972. doi: 10.1126/science.1082047.
Dejean, A., Djieto-Lordon, C. & Durand, J. L. (1997). Ant mosaic in oil palm plantations of the southwest province Cameroon: impact on leaf miner beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 90: 1092-1096.
Dejean, A., Fisher, B.L., Corbara, B., Rarevohitra, R., Randrianaivo, R., Rajemison, B. & Leponce, M. (2010). Spatial distribution of dominant arboreal ants in a Malagasy Coastal rainforest: gaps and presence of an invasive species. PLoS ONE, 5(2): e9319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009319.
Devarajan, K. (2016). The ants social network: determinants of nest structure and arrangement in Asian Weaver Ants. PLoS ONE, 11(7): e0159284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159284.
Diamé, L., Rey, J.Y., Vayssières, J.F, Grechi, I., Chailleux, A. & Diarra, K. (2017). Ants: major functional elements in fruit agro-ecosystems and biological control agents. Sustainability, 10: 23. doi: 10.3390/su10010023.
Elwood, M.D.F., Blüthgen, N., Fayle, T.M. & Foster, W.A. (2016). Competition can lead to unexpected patterns in tropical ant communities. Acta Oecologica, 75: 24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2016.06.001.
Falcão, J.C.F., Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C., Rico-Gray, V. (2017). Assessing the impacts of tramp and invasive species on the structure and dynamics of ant-plant interaction networks. Biological Conservation, 209: 517-523. doi: 10.1016/ j.biocon.2017.03.023.
Fayle, T.M., Turner, E.C. & Foster, W.A. (2013). Ant mosaics occur in SE Asian oil palm plantation but not rain forest are influenced by the presence of nest-sites and non-native species. Ecography, 36: 1051-1057. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587. 2012.00192.x.
Floren, A., Freking, A., Biehl, M. & Linscnmair, K. E. (2001). Anthropogenic disturbance changes the structure of arboreal tropical ant communities. Ecography, 24: 547-554. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587. 2001.tb00489. x.
Gotelli, N.J. & Arnett, A.E. (2000). Biogeographic effects of red fire ant invasion. Ecology Letters, 3: 257-261. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000. 00138.x.
Gotelli, N. J. (2000). Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology, 81: 2606-2621. doi: 10.1890/ 0012-9658(2000)081[2606: NMAOSC]2.0.CO;2.
Gotelli, N.J. & Elison, A.M. (2013). EcoSimR Niche Overlap Tutorial. http://www.uvm.edu (accessed: November, 2017).
Harris, L.D. (1984). The fragmented forest: island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. Univ. of Chicago Press.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The Ants. Harvard Univ. Press, 732 p.
Holway, D.A, Lach, L., Suarez, A.V, Tsutsui, N.D & Case, T.J. (2002). The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33: 181-233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444.
Jackson, D.A. (1984). Ant distribution patterns in a Cameroonian cocoa plantation: investigation of the ant mosaic hypothesis. Oecologia, 62: 318-324. doi: 10.1007/BF00384263
Klimes, P., Milan, J., Sentiko, I., Joseph, K. & Vojtech, N. (2011). Experimental suppression of ants foraging on rainforest vegetation in New Guinea: testing methods for a whole-forest manipulation of insect communities. Ecological Entomology, 36: 94-103 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01250.x.
Krebs, C.J. (1989). Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
Lach, L., Parr, C.L. & Abbot, K.L. (2010). Ant Ecology. Oxford University Press.
Leston, D. (1973). The ant mosaic-tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. Pest Articles and News Summaries, 19: 311-341. doi: 10.1080/09670877309412778.
Majer, J. D. (1976). The influence of ants and ant manipulation on the cocoa farm fauna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 13: 157-175.
Majer, J.D. (1992). Comparison of arboreal ant mosaics in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guimea and Australia -its structure and influence on arthropods diversity. In: Gauld LA (ed), Hymenoptera and Biodiversity. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 115-141.
Majer, J.D., Delabie, J.H.C. & Smith, R.B. (1994). Arboreal ant community patterns in Brazilian cocoa farms. Biotropica, 26: 73-83. doi: 10.2307/2389112.
Migani, V., Ekesi, S., Merkel, K. & Hoffmeister, T. (2017). At lunch with a killer: the effect of weaver ants on host-parasitoid interactions on mango. PLoS ONE, 12(2): e0170101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170101
.
Morris, R.J. (2010). Anthropogenic impacts on tropical forest biodiversity: a network structure and ecosystem functioning perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365: 3709-3718. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0273.
Pacific Invasive Ant Group (PIAG). (2017). Pacific Ant Prevention Plan. www.issg.org (accessed January 2017).
Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. (2013). Ant assemblage on a coffee farm: spatial mosaic versus shifting patchwork. Environmental Entomology, 42: 38-48. doi: 10.1603/EN12107.
Pfeiffer, M., Cheng Tuck, H. & Chong Lay. T. (2008). Exploring arboreal ant community composition and co-occurrence patterns in plantations of oil palm Elaeis guineensis in Borneo and Peninsular Malaysia. Ecography, 31: 21-32. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05172.x.
Philpott, S.M. (2006). Ant patchiness: a spatially quantitative test in coffee agroecosystems. Naturwissenschaften, 93: 386-392. doi: 10.1007/s00114-006-0123-0.
Pianka, E.R. (1973). The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 53-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413.
Powell, S., Costa, A.N., Lopes, C.T. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2011). Canopy connectivity and the availability of diverse nesting resources affect species coexistence in arboreal ants. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80: 352-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656. 2010.01779.x.
Ribas, C.R. & Schoereder, J.H. (2002). Are all ant mosaic caused by competition? Oecologia, 131: 606-611. doi: 10.10 07/s00442-002-0912-x.
Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic. M. & Soares, S.M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314.
Rizali, A., Bos, M.M., Buchori, D., Yamane, S. & Schulze, C.H. (2008). Ants in tropical urban habitats: the myrmecofauna in a densely populated area of Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. Hayati Journal of Biosciences, 15: 77-84. doi: 10.4308/hjb.15.2.77.
Rizali, A., Rahim, A., Sahari, B., Prasetyo, L.B. & Buchori, D. (2011). Impact of invasive ant species in shaping ant community structure on small islands in Indonesia. Jurnal Biologi Indonesia, 7: 221-230.
Room, P.M. (1975). Relative distributions of ant species in cocoa plantations in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Applied Ecology, 12:47-61. doi: 10.2307/2401717.
Sanders, N.J., Gotelli, N.J, Heller, N. & Gordon, D.M. (2003). Community disassembly by an invasive species. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 100: 2474-2477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437913100.
Sanders, N.J., Crutsinger, J.M, Dunn, R.R., Majer, J.D., Delabie, J.H.C. (2007). An ant mosaic revisited: dominant ant species disassemble arboreal ant communities but co-occur randomly. Biotropica, 39: 153-160. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429. 2007.00263.x.
Siregar, M. (2006). Species Diversity of Local Fruit Trees in Kalimantan: Problems of conservation and its development. Biodiversitas, 7: 94-99. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d070123.
Souza da Conceição, E., Delabie, J.H.C., Lucia, T.M.C.D., Costa-Neto, A. & Majer, J.D. (2015). Structural changes in arboreal ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in an age sequence of cocoa plantations in the south-east of Bahia, Brazil. Austral Entomology, 54: 315-324. doi: 10.1111/aen.12128.
Southwood, T.R.E. & Kennedy, C.E.J. (1983). Tree as islands. Oikos, 41: 359-371.
Tadu, Z., Djiéto-Lordon, C., Yede., Youbi, E.M., Aléné, C.D., Fomena, A. & Babin, R. (2014). Ant mosaics in cocoa agroforestry systems of Southern Cameroon: influence of shade on the occurrence and spatial distribution of dominant ants. Agroforestry Systems, 88: 1067-1079, doi: 10.1007/s10457-014-9676-7.
Tanaka, H.O., Yamane, S. & Itioka, T. (2012). Effects of a fern-dwelling ant species, Crematogaster difformis, on the ant assemblages of emergent trees in a Bornean tropical rainforest. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 105: 592-598. doi: 10.1603/AN11149.
Tanga, C.M., Ekesi, S., Govender, P., Nderitu, P.W. & Mohamed, S.A. (2016). Antagonistic interactions between the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda and the parasitoid Anagyrus pseudococci potentially limits suppression of the invasive mealybug Rastrococcu siceryoides. Insects, 7. doi: 10.3390/insects7010001.
Tsuji, K., Hasyim Harlion, A. & Nakamura, K. (2004). Asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and their repelling of pollinators. Ecological Research, 19: 669-673. doi: 10.11 11/j.1440-1703.2004.00682.x.
Tschinkel, W.R. & Hess, C.A. (1999). Arboreal ant community of a pine forest in northern Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 93: 63-72. doi: 10.1673/031.003.2101
Van Mele, P. (2008). A historical review of research on the weaver ant Oecophylla in biological control. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 13-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00350.x.
Yanoviak, S.P. & Schnitzer, S.A. (2013). Functional roles of lianas for forest canopy animals. In: Lowman, M., Devy, S., Ganesh, D.T. (eds.), Treetops at risk: challenges of global forest canopies. Springer, pp. 209-214.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
