Daily and Seasonal Foraging Activity of the Oriental Non-army Ant Doryline Cerapachys sulcinodis Species Complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Riou Mizuno, Piyawan Suttiprapan, Weeyawat Jaitrong, Fuminori Ito


The ant subfamily Dorylinae contains the true army ant genera, the species of which are dominant predators, as well as non-army ants. Some of the non-army ant genera are closely related to true army ants, so they could be an important key in understanding the evolution of the army ant adaptive syndrome. Nevertheless, there has been little field research on the non-army ant doryline species because many of them are very rare. Cerapachys is one of the genera closely related to the Old-World army ants. We found some species of Cerapachys are commonly distributed in northern Thailand, so we investigated the daily and seasonal foraging activities of a non-army doryline ant of Cerapachys sulcinodis species complex in the seasonal tropical area of northern Thailand. Workers of the C. sulcinodis complex were diurnal and actively foraged during the rainy season, and their reproduction and foraging activity paused during the dry season. This report is the first on the foraging activity of non-army doryline ants under field conditions.



seasonality; diurnal habit; seasonal tropical region; Dorylinae Cerapachyinae

Full Text:



Ashikin, N. & Hashim, R. (2015). Daily activity patterns of Platythyrea parallela in Peninsular Malaysia. Asian Myrmecology, 7: 145-154. doi: 10.20362/am.007015

Borowiec, M.L. (2016). Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dorylinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys, 608: 1-280. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.608.9427

Borowiec, M.L. (2017). Convergent evolution of the army ant syndrome & congruence in big-data phylogenetics. bioRxiv, 134064. doi: 10.1101/134064

Brize, D.T. (1984). Interactions between a myrmecophagous ant and a prey species. Journal of Australian entomological Society, 23: 167-168.

Brown, W.L. J. (1975). Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. V. Ponerinae, tribes Platythyreini, Cerapachyini, Cylindromyrmecini, Acanthostichini, and Aenictogitini. Search. Agriculture, 5: 1-115.

Caut, S., Barroso, A., Cerda, X., Amor, F. & Boulay, R.R. (2012). A year in an ant's life: opportunism and seasonal variation in the foraging ecology of Aphaenogaster senilis. Ecoscience, 20: 19-27. doi: 10.2980/20-1-3559

Chantarasawat, N., Sitthicharoenchai, D., Chaisuekul, C. & Lekprayoon, C. (2013). Comparison of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) diversity in dry dipterocarp and mixed-deciduous forests at Sri Nan national park, Northern Thailand. Tropical Natural History, 13: 1-19.

Clark, J. (1924). Australian Formicidae. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 10: 75-89.

Clark, J. (1941). Australian Formicidae: notes and new species. Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 12: 71-94.

Donoso, D.A., Vieira, J.M. & Wild, A.L. (2006). Three new species of Leptanilloides Mann from Andean Ecuador (Formicidae: Leptanilloidinae). Zootaxa, 1201: 47-62.

Gotwald, W.H. (1995). Army ants: the biology of social predation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 302 p

Hölldobler, B. (1980). Canopy orientation: a new kind of orientation in ants. Science, 210: 86-88.

Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p

Hood, W.G. & Tschinkel, W.R. (1990). Desiccation resistance in arboreal and terrestrial ants. Physiological Entomology, 15: 23-35.

Jaitrong, W. & Yamane, Sk. (2010). The army ant Aenictus silvestrii and its related species in Southeast Asia, with a description of a new species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae). Entomological Science, 13: 328–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2010.00385.x

Jaitrong, W. & Yamane, Sk. (2011). Synopsis of Aenictus species groups and revision of the A. currax and A. laeviceps groups in the eastern Oriental, Indo-Australian, and Australasian regions (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae). Zootaxa, 3128: 1–46.

Jaitrong, W. & Yamane, Sk. (2012). Review of the Southeast Asian species of the Aenictus javanus and Aenictus philippinensis species groups (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Aenictinae). ZooKeys, 193: 49–78. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.193.2768

Jaitrong, W. & Yamane, Sk. (2013). The Aenictus ceylonicus species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Aenictinae) from Southeast Asia. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 31: 165-233. doi: 10.3897/jhr.31.4274

Kaspari, M. & Weiser. M.D. (2000). Ant activity along moisture gradients in a Neotropical forest. Biotropica, 32: 703-711. doi: 10.1646/0006-3606(2000)032[0703:AAAMGI]2.0.CO;2

Kronauer, D.J.C. (2009). Recent advances in army ant biology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 12: 51-65.

MacKay, W.P. & MacKay, E.E. (1989). Diurnal foraging patterns of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). The Southwestern Naturalist, 34: 213-218.

Malsh, A.K.F., Rościszewski, K. & Maschwitz, U. (2003). The ant species richness and diversity of a primary lowland rainforest, the Pasoh Forest Reserve, West-Malaysia. In T. Okuda, N. Manokaran, K. Niiyama, S.C. Thomas, & P.S. Ashton (Eds.), Pasoh: Ecology of lowland rainforest in Southeast Asia (pp. 348-373), Tokyo: Springer.

Oxley, P.R., Ji, L., Fetter-Pruneda, I., McKenzie, S.K., Li, C., Hu, H., Zhang, G. & Kronauer, D.J.C. (2014). The genome of the clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi. Current Biology, 24: 451-458. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.018

Peeters, C. & Ito, F. (2015). Wingless and dwarf workers underlie the ecological success of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 21: 117-130.

Ravary F, Jahyny, B. & Jaisson, P. (2006). Brood stimulation controls the phasic reproductive cycle of the parthenogenetic ant Cerapachys biroi. Insectes Sociaux, 53: 20-26. doi: 10.1007/s00040-005-0828-7

Rosengren, R. (1977). Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). II. Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity. Acta zoologica Fennica, 150: 2-30.

Sánchez-Peña, S.R. & Mueller, U.G. (2002). A nocturnal raid of Nomamyrmex army ants on Atta leaf-cutting ants in Tamaulipas, Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist, 27: 221-223.

Schneirla, T.C. (1971). Army ants. A Study in Social Organization. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and company, 349 p

Schneirla, T.C. & Reyes, A.Y. (1966). Raiding and related behaviour in two surface adapted species of the old world Doryline ant, Aenictus. Animal Behaviour, 14: 132-148.

Ulrich, Y., Burns, D., Libbrecht, R. & Kronauer, D.J.C. (2016). Ant larvae regulate worker foraging behavior and ovarian activity in a dose-dependent manner. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70: 1011-1018. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-2046-2

Wehner, R. & Wehner, S. (2011). Parallel evolution of thermophilia: daily and seasonal foraging patterns of heat adapted desert ants: Cataglyphis and Ocymyrmex species. Physiological entomology, 36: 271-281. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2011.00795.x

Whitford, W.G., Johnson, P. & Ramirez, J. (1976). Comparative ecology of the harvester ants Pogonomyrmex barabatus (F. Smith) and Pogonomyrmex rugosus (Emery). Insectes sociaux, 23: 117-132.

Wilson, E.O. (1958). Observations on the behavior of the cerapachyine ants. Insectes Sociaux, 5: 129-140.

Wilson, E.O. (1959). Studies on the ant fauna of Melanesia VI. The tribe Cerapachyini. Pacific Insects, 1: 39-57.

Yamane, Sk. & Hashimoto, Y. (1999). A remarkable new species of the army ant genus Aenictus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) with a polymorphic worker caste. Tropics, 8: 427-432.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v66i2.3775


  • There are currently no refbacks.

JCR Impact Factor 2018: 0.604