Annual survival rate of tropical stingless bee colonies (Meliponini): variation among habitats at the landscape scale in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Marília Dantas e Silva, Mauro Ramalho, Jaqueline Figuerêdo Rosa

Abstract


Stingless social bees live in perennial colonies whose longevity is influenced by various ecological factors. This study analyzed the influence of habitat anthropization and native forest regeneration stage on the longevity of natural colonies at the landscape scale. Random sampling of 25x25m plots, totaling 30ha per habitat type, located and monitored 118 nests of 14 species in the forest and 105 nests of six species in the anthropic habitat. Significant differences in colony longevity were observed between young and long-lived forests  and between long-lived forests and anthropized habitat. Shorter longevities have generally been associated with a set of smaller-bodied species residing in anthropized habitats. The greatest longevities were associated with the three abundant and exclusive forest species, and was similar in the two forest regeneration stages: Melipona scutellaris, Scaptotrigona xanthotricha and Scaptotrigona bipunctata had high annual survival rates ranging from 87% to 93%. Another abundant species in the landscape was Tetragonisca angustula, a small habitat-generalist with short longevity (63%) that varied among habitats. Euclidean distance analysis based on this generalist placed young forest closest to anthropic habitat, and grouped the replicates of long-lived forest. Considering spatial variation in the life history traits, we infer that, among prospective landscape habitats, the Atlantic Forest favors stingless bees with high colonial longevity. On the other hand, generalists, such as T. angustula, with shorter colonial longevity and high reproduction rates are being favored by the expansion of anthropized habitats in place of deforested areas.


Keywords


resilience; mass-effect; reproduction rate; generalist; Tetragonisca angustula.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agosta, S.J. & Klemens, J.A. (2009). Resource specialization in a phytophagous insect: no evidence for genetically based performance trade-offs across hosts in the field or laboratory. Journal Compilatio European Society for Evolutionary Biology, 22: 907–912. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01694.x.

Alonzo, S.H. & Kindsvater, H.K. (2008). Life-History Patterns. In Jorgensen, S.E. and Fath, B.D. Encyclopedia of Ecology. Amsterdã, Elsevier B.V. Pp 2175-2180.

Araújo, E.D., Costa, M., Chaud-Netto, J., Fowler, H. (2004). Body size and flight distance in stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini): inference of flight range and possible ecological implications. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 64(3B): 563-568. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842004000400003.

Batista, M.A., Ramalho, M. & Soares, A.E.E. (2003). Nesting sites and abundance of Meliponini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in heterogeneous habitats of the atlantic rain forest, Bahia, Brazil. Lundiana, 4: 19-23.

Biesmeijer, J.C., Slaa, J. (2006).The structure of eusocial bee assemblages in Brazil. Apidologie, 37: 240-258. doi: 10.1051/apido:2006014.

Biesmeijer, J.C., Slaa, J. (2004). Information flow and organization of stingless bee foraging. Apidologie, 35: 143-157. doi: 10.1051/apido:2004003.

Brosi, B.J., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R. (2007). Bee community shifts with landscape context in a tropical countryside. Ecological Applications, 17: 418-430. doi: 10.18 90/06-0029.

Brown, J.C. & Albrecht, C. (2001). The effect of tropical deforestation on stingless bees of the genus Melipona (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in central Rondonia, Brazil. Journal of Biogeography, 28: 623-634.

CEI-CONDER (BA). (1993). Informações básicas dos municípios baianos: Litoral Sul.Salvador, 1993. v 5. p.1100.

Eltz, T., Brühl, C.A., Kaars, S.V. & Linsenmair, K.E. (2002). Determinants of stingless bee nest density in lowland dipterocarp forests of Sabah, Malaysia. Oecologia, 131: 27-34.

Engels, W. & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. (1990). Caste development, reproductive strategies and control of fertility in honey bees andstingless bees. In:Social Insects: an Evolutionary Approach to Castesand Reproduction (Ed. by W. Engels), pp. 166-230. Berlin:Springer-Verlag.

Flesher, K.M. (2006). The biogeography of the medium and large mammals in a human dominated landscape in the Atlantic Forest of Bahia, Brazil: evidence for the role of agroforestry systems as wildlife habitat. Doctoral Tesis.Program in Ecology and Evolution. School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. 624p.

Gouvêa, P.C. & Ramalho, M. (2020). Spatial structure and mass effect in a stingless bee population (Meliponini): a field experiment in a landscape with tropical forest and silviculture. N.p.

Hrncir, M., Maia-Silva, C., Teixeira-Souza, V.H.S. & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. (2019). Stingless bees and their adaptations to extreme environments. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 205: 415-426. doi: 10.1007/s00359-019-01327-3.

Janzen, D.H. (1985). On ecological fitting. Oikos, 45: 308-310.

Johnson, L.K. (1982). Patterns of communication and recruitment in stingless bees. Pp. 323-34. In: M. D. Breed; C. D. Michener & H. E. Evans (eds.). The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder.

Johnson, L.K.; Hubbell, S. P. & Feener, D. H. (1987). Defense of food supply by eusocial colonies. American Zoologist, 27: 347-358.

Kleinert, A.M.P., Ramalho, M., Laurino, M.C., Ribeiro, M.F. & Impetratriz-Fonseca, V.L. (2012) Social bees (Meliponini, Apinini, Bombini). In: A.R. Panizzi, J.R.P. Parra (eds.) Insect Bioecology and Nutrition for Integrated Pest Management (pp. 237-271). CRC: Boca Raton.

Köppen, W. (1948). Climatologia: con un estudio de los climas de la terra. México: Fondo de Cultura Economica. 479p.

Lichtenberg, E.M., Mendenhall, C.D. & Brosi, B. (2017). Foraging traits modulate stingless bee community disassembly under forest loss. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86: 1401-1416. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12747.

Moo-Valle, H, Quezada-Euán, J.J.G. & Wenseleers, T. (2001). The effect of food reserves on the production of sexual offspring in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii (Apidae, Meliponini). Insectes Sociaux, 48: 398-403.

Nieh, J.C., Contrera, F.A.L., Yoon, R.R. et al. (2004). Polarized short odor-trail recruitment communication by a stingless bee, Trigona spinipes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56: 435-448. doi: 10.1007/s00265-004-0804-7.

Ramalho, M. (2004). Stingless bees and mass flowering trees in the canopy of AtlanticForest: a tight relationship. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 18: 37-47. doi: 10.1590/S0102-33062004000100005.

Ricketts, T.H. (2004). Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Conservation Biology, 18: 1262-71.doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00227.x

Roubik, D.W. (1983). Nest and colony characteristics of stingless bees from Panama (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 6: 327–355.

Roubik, D.N. (1989) Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press. 514p.

Roubik, D.W. 1993. Direct costs of forest reproduction, bee-cycling and the efficiency of pollination modes. Journal of Biosciences, 18: 537-552

Sakagami, S.F. (1982). Stingless bees. Pp. 361-423. In: H.R. Herman (ed.). Social insects. Academic Press Inc., New York.

Silva, M.D., Ramalho, M., Monteiro, D. (2013). Diversity and habitat use bystingless bees (Apidae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Apidologie, 44: 699-707. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0218-5.

Silva, M.D., Ramalho, M. & Monteiro, D. (2014). Communities of Social Bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in Trap-Nests:the Spatial Dynamics of Reproduction in an Area of Atlantic Forest. Neotropical Entomology, 43: 307-313. doi: 10.1007/s13744-014-0219-8.

Silva, M.D. & Ramalho, M. (2014). Tree species used for nesting by stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in the Atlantic Rain Forest (Brazil): Availability or Selectivity. Sociobiology, 61: 415-422. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.415-422.

Slaa, E.J. (2006). Population dynamics of a stingless bee community in the seasonal dry lowlands of Costa Rica. Insectes Sociaux, 53: 70-79. doi: 10.1007/s00040-005-0837-6.

Stearns, S.C. 1997. The evolution of life histories. - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, N.M., Crone, E.E, Roulston, T.H., Minckley, R.L., Packer, L. & Potts S.G. (2010). Ecological and life history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biological Conservation, 143: 2280-2291. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon. 2010.03.024.

Woitowicz-Gruchowski, F.C., Silva, C.I. & Ramalho, M. (2020). Experimental field test of the influence of generalist stingless bees (Meliponini) on the topology of a bee-flower mutualistic network in the tropics. Ecological Entomology, 45: 854-866. doi: 10.1111/een.12862.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v68i1.5147

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JOURNAL METRICS

 

JCR Impact Factor (2019): 0.690

JCR 5-year Impact Factor (2019): 0.846

Google Scholar h5-index (Insects and Arthropods journals): 12 

Scimago h-index (whole journal circulation period): 37         

Scopus CiteScore (2016-2019): 0.90

Mean time for editorial decision (2020): 78 days

Mean time for article publication (2020): 171 days

 

Sociobiology is indexed in the following databases: