Comparison of Foraging Ability Between Solenopsis invicta and Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Authors

  • Yong yue Lu South China Agricultural University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i3.563

Keywords:

Solenopsis invicta, Tapinoma melanocephalum, searching time, recruitment time

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the foraging ability of the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta and native ant Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by measuring their searching and recruitment time for 5 types of food (sausage, sausage & honey, honey, mealworm and peanut oil) in infested wasteland and litchi orchards in south China. The searching time was determined by measuring the time required for the first ant to find the food. The recruitment time was determined by measuring the time to recruit 10 ants to the food which was placed on petri dish 30 cm away from nest entrances. 30 colonies each of T. melanocephalum and S. invicta were tested. In the infested wasteland, the searching time of S. invicta for sausage & honey, sausage, mealworm and honey and the recruitment time of S. invicta for sausage & honey, mealworm and honey were significantly longer than those of T. melanocephalum, but the searching time of these two species of ants for peanut oil was not significantly different. In the infested litchi orchard, the recruitment time of S. invicta for sausage was significantly longer than that of T. melanocephalum, while the recruitment time for the other four types of food was not significantly different between the two species of ants. The searching time for all the five types of food was not significantly different between the two species of ants in the infested litchi orchard.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfredo, F., C. Jim. 2004. Putting out the fire. Agri. Res. 52(12):12-14.

Calcaterra, L.A., J.P. Livore, A. Delgado & J.A. Briano. 2008. Ecological dominance of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, in its native range. Oecol. 152(2): 411-421.

Callcott, A.M., H.L. Collins. 1996. Invasion and range expansion of imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in North America from 1918-1995. Flor. Entomol. (79):240-251.

Callott, A.M. 2002. Range expansion of the imported fire ant 1918-2001. In Diffie, S.K.(ed) 2002 Annual Imported fire ant Research Conference, Athens, Georgia.

Holway, D.A., L. Lach, A.V. Suarez, N.D. Tsutsui & T.J. Case. 2002. The Cause and consequences of ant invasions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. and Syst. (33):181-233.

Johnson, L.K., S.P. Hubbell & D.H. Feener. 1987. Defense of food supply by eusocial colonies. Am. Zool. (27):347-358.

Jones, S.R., S.A. Philips. 1990. Resource collecting abilities of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) compared with those of three sympatric Texas ants. South-west. Nat. (35):416-422.

Li, J., S.C.Han,Z.G. Li, & B.S. Zhang. 2008. The behavior observe of Tapinoma melanocephalum native competitive species of Solenopsis invicta. Plant Quarantine, 22(1):19-21.

Li, Q.X., D.H. He, Y.D. Chang, & L.D. Liu. 2000. Overview of ants foraging. J. Ningxia Agri. Uni. 21(2):94-97.

Lu, Y.Y., B.Q. Wu, Y.J. Xu, & L. Zeng. 2012. Effects of red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) on the species strcuture of several ant communities in South China. Sociobio. 59(1)

Morrison, L.W. 1999. Indirect effects of phorid fly parasitoids on the mechanisms of interspecific competition among ants. Oecol., (121):113-122.

Porter, S.D., D.A. Savignano. 1990. Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecol. (71):2095-2106.

Porter, S.D.1992. Frequency and distribution of polygyne fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Florida. Fla. Entomol. (75):248-257.

Reitz, S.R., J.T. Trumble. 2002. Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. (47): 435-465.

Schoener, T.W. 1974. Resource portioning in ecological communities. Science,185:27-39.

Shen, P., X.L. Zhao, D.F. Cheng, Y.Q. Zheng & F.R. Lin. Impacts of the imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta invasion on the diversity of native ants.J. Southwest Nor.Uni. 32 (4):93-97.

Smith, M.R. 1965. House-infesting ants of the eastern United States: Their recognition biology and economic importance. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. 1326.

Vinson, S.B. 1997. Invasion of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): spread, biology and impact. Am. Entomol. 43(1):23-29.

Wu, B.Q., Y.Y. Lu, L. Zeng, & G.W Liang. 2008. Influences of Solenopsis invicta Buren invasion on the native ant communities in different habitats in Guangdong. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 19(1):151-156.

Wu, J., C.L. Wang.1995. Chinese ants.Beijing:Chin. Forestry Pr.

Xu, R.M., X.Y. Cheng. 2005. Insect population ecology-foundation and frontier. Beijing: Sci. and Tch. Press, 326.

Xu, Y.J., Y.Y. Lu, L. Zeng, & N.D. Li.2006.Attraction of several baits to workers of red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta.Chin. B. Entomol.43(6):856-857.

Zeng, L., Y.Y. Lu & Z.N. Chen 2005. Management and surveillance of red imported fire ant. Guangdong Science & Technique Press, Guangzhou, China, 106pp.

Zeng, L., Y.Y. Lu, X.F. He, W.Q. Zhang & G.W. Liang. 2005. Identification of red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta to invade mainland China and infestation in Wuchuan,Guangdong. Chin. Bul. Entomol. 42:144-148.

Zheng,J.H., Mao R.Q., & R.J. Zhang. 2007. Comparisons of foraging activities and competitive interactions between the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and two native ants under high soil-surface temperatures. Sociobio. 50(3):1165-1175.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-10

How to Cite

Lu, Y. yue. (2014). Comparison of Foraging Ability Between Solenopsis invicta and Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 59(3), 1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i3.563

Issue

Section

Articles