Measuring the effect of long-term pitfall trapping on the prevalence of epigeal arthropods: A case study in the Pacific Coast of Colombia

Authors

  • José Maria Martinez Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - Agrosavia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-2374
  • Rubilma Tarazona Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - Agrosavia
  • Bernhard Leo Lohr Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - Agrosavia
  • Consuelo Alexandra Narvaez Universidade Federal de Viçosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v68i2.5928

Keywords:

arthropods population, Ectatomma ruidum, long-term trapping, pitfall trapping

Abstract

Pitfall trapping remains one of the most frequently used methods to assess ground-active arthropods’ diversity and density. Yet, one of its main drawbacks, the possibility that repeated collecting may affect the study objects’ population, has not been formally tested. We studied the effect of a yearlong epigeal pitfall trapping exercise with 22 fortnightly capture events in four differently disturbed areas at the Colombian Pacific coast. A transect of 100 m length with ten equidistant pitfall traps was established in each area, and the traps were operated twice a month for 24 hours. Using count data regression models, we find that trapping did not affect subsequent captures when we analyzed non-ant arthropods. For ants, regression estimates indicate that each subsequent trapping in highly-disturbed environments ended, on average, reducing all ants in between -3.8 and -4.1%, and Ectatomma ruidum between -4.7 and -5.1%. We recommend bio-ecological aspects of the species under study be considered when interpreting results. This is important for future studies that rely on this method to deliver consistent estimates of population sizes or study their dynamics through time. At the same time, it is also a call for scientists to revise more carefully how species’ peculiar traits may limit the reliability of traditional methods.

References

Adis, J. (1979). Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 202: 177-184.

Brown, G.R. & Matthews, I.M. (2016). A review of extensive variation in the design of pitfall traps and a proposal for a standard pitfall trap design for monitoring ground-active arthropod biodiversity. Ecology and Evolution, 6: 3953-64. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2176

Cameron, A.C. & Trivedi, P.K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

Cameron, A.C. & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using Stata. The Stata Press. College Station, TX.

Franz N.M. & Wcislo, T. (2003). Foraging Behavior in Two Species of Ectatomma (Formicidae: Ponerinae): Individual Learning of Orientation and Timing. Journal of Insect Behaviour, 16: 381-410. doi: 10.1023/A:1024880110189

Gist, C.S. & Crossley, J.R (1973). A Method for Quantifying Pitfall Trapping. Environmental Entomology, 2: 951-52. doi: 10.1093/ee/2.5.951

Greene, W.H. (2012). Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Greenslade, P.J.M. (1964). Pitfall Trapping as a Method for Studying Populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). Journal of Animal Ecology, 33: 301-10. doi: 10.2307/2632

Greenslade, P.J.M. (1973). Sampling ants with pitfall traps: Digging-in effects. Insectes Sociaux, 20: 343-53. doi: 10.1007/ BF02226087

Hayes, W.B. (1970). The Accuracy of Pitfall Trapping for the Sand-Beach Isopod Tylos punctatus. Ecology, 51: 514-16. doi: 10.2307/1935388

Jansen, M.J.W. & Metz, J.A.J. (1979). How many victims will a pitfall make? Acta Biotheoretica, 28: 98-122. doi: 10.1007/BF00046807

Jiménez-Carmona, F., Carpintero, S. & Reyes-López, J.L. (2019). The digging-in effect on ant studies with pitfall traps: influence of type of habitat and sampling time. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 167: 906-14. doi: 10.1111/eea.12834

Joosse, E.N.G. (1965). Pitfall-trapping as a method for studying surface dwelling collembola. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 55: 587-96. doi: 10.1007/BF00407477

Joosse, E.N.G. & Kapteijn, J.M. (1968). Activity-stimulating phenomena caused by field-disturbance in the use of pitfall-traps. Oecologia, 1: 385-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00386692

Lachaud, J.P. (1990). Foraging activity and diet in some neotropical ponerine ants. I. Ectatomma ruidum Roger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 78: 241-56.

Lasmar, C.J., Queiroz, A.C.M., Rabello, A.M., Feitosa, R.M., Canedo-Júnior, E.O., Schmidt, F.A., Cuissi, R.G. & Ribas, C.R. (2017). Testing the effect of pitfall-trap installation on ant sampling. Insectes Sociaux, 64: 445-51. doi: 10.1007/s0 0040-017-0558-7

Löhr, B.L. & Narváez, C.A. (2021). Land use and terrestrial arthropods at the Colombian Pacific coast. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 47: e7640. doi: 10.25100/socolen.v47i1.7640

Luff, M.L. (1975). Some Features Influencing the Efficiency of Pitfall Traps. Oecologica, 19: 345-57. doi: 10.1007/BF 00348110

Reyes, C.R. (2012). Respuesta fisiológica de la palma aceitera (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) a la disponibilidad de agua en el suelo. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Costa Rica. San José de Costa Rica. 210 p.

Santamaría, C., Armbrecht, I. & Lachaud, J.P. (2009). Nest Distribution and Food Preferences of Ectatomma ruidum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Shaded and Open Cattle Pastures of Colombia. Sociobiology, 53: 517-541.

Schirmel, J., Lenze, S., Katzmann, D. & Buchholz, S. (2010). Capture efficiency of pitfall traps is highly affected by sampling interval. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 136: 206-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01020.x

Sheikh, A.H., Ganaie, G.A., Thomas, M., Bhandari, R. & Rather Y.A. (2018). Ant pitfall trap sampling: An overview. Journal of Entomological Research, 42: 421-36. doi: 10.59 58/0974-4576.2018.00072.5

Slezák, V., Hora, P. & Tuf, I.H. (2010). Effect of pitfall-trapping on the abundance of epigeic macrofauna – preliminary results. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae 74:129-33.

Stevens, J.P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum.

Southwood, T.R.E. (1978). Ecological Methods: with particular reference to the study of insect populations, 2nd ed. Springer. Heidelberg, Germany.

Southwood, T.R.E. & Henderson, P.A. (2016). Ecological Methods, 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell. Hoboken, NJ.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-11

How to Cite

Martinez, J. M., Tarazona, R., Lohr, B. L., & Narvaez, C. A. (2021). Measuring the effect of long-term pitfall trapping on the prevalence of epigeal arthropods: A case study in the Pacific Coast of Colombia. Sociobiology, 68(2), e5928. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v68i2.5928

Issue

Section

Research Article - Ants