Waste Management in the Stingless Bee Melipona beecheii Bennett (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.435-440Keywords:
Stingless bees, nest hygiene, task partitioning, division of labor, age polyethismAbstract
Waste management is important in insect societies because waste can be hazardous to adults, brood and food stores. The general organization of waste management and the influence of task partitioning, division of labor and age polyethism on waste processing were studied in three colonies of the tropical American stingless bee Melipona beecheii Bennett in Yucatán, Mexico. Waste generated in the colony (feces, old brood cells, cocoons, dead adults and brood) was collected by workers throughout the nest and taken to specific waste dumps within the nest. During the day, workers based at the waste dumps formed waste pellets, which they directly transferred in 93% of cases, to other workers who subsequently removed them from the nest. This is an example of task partitioning and is hypothesized to improve nest hygiene as has been found in leafcutting ants, Atta. To investigate division of labor and age polyethism we marked a cohort of 144 emerging workers. Workers forming waste pellets were on average 31.2±6.5 days old (±SD, N= 40, range of 18-45 days). The life span of M. beecheii workers was 49.0±14.0 days (N= 144). There was no difference in the life span of workers who formed (52.2±11.6 days, N= 40) or did not form (49.9±11.5 days, N= 97) waste pellets, suggesting that waste work did not increase mortality. Although waste was probably not hazardous to adults and brood, because the dumps are located outside the brood chamber, its presence inside the nests can attract phorid flies and predators, which can harm the colony.References
Anderson, C., Franks, N.R., & McShea, D.W. (2001) The complexity and hierarchical structure in insect societies. Anim. Behav. 62: 643-651. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1795
Anderson, C. & Ratnieks F.L.W. (2000) Task partitioning in insect societies: novel situations. Insectes Soc. 47: 198-199. doi: 10.1007/PL00001702
Ayala, R. (1999) Revisión de las abejas sin aguijón de México (Hymenoptera; Apidae; Meliponini). Folia Entomol. Mex. 106: 1-123.
Bego, L.R. (1983) On some aspects of bionomics in Melipona bicolor bicolor Lepeletier (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Braz. J. Biol. 27: 211-224.
Biesmeijer J.C. & Toth E. (1998) Individual foraging, activity level and longevity in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii in Costa Rica (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Insectes Soc. 45: 427-443.
Bot, A.N.M., Currie C.R., Hart A.G. & Boomsma J.J. (2001) Waste management in leafcutting ants. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 13: 225-237. doi:10.1080/08927014.2001.9522772
Bruijn, de L.M.M., Sommeijer, M.J. & Dijkstra E. (1989) Behaviour of workers on waste dumps in the nest of Melipona favosa (Apidae, Meliponini). Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 5: 31-37.
Dijkema, G.P.J., Reuter M.A. & Verhoef E.V. (2000) A new paradigm for waste management. Waste Manag. 20: 633-638. doi: 10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00052-0
Doan, P.L. (1998) Institutionalizing household waste collection: the urban environmental management project in Côte d’Ivoire. Habitat Itnl. 22: 27-39.
Echazarreta, C.M., Quezada-Euan, J.J.G., Medina L.M. & Pasteur K.L. (1997) Beekeeping in the Yucatan peninsula: development and current status. Bee Wld. 78: 115-127.
Eltz, T., Bruhl, C.A., Van der Kaars, S. & Insenmair K.E. (2001) Assessing stingless bee pollen diet by analysis of garbage pellets: a new method. Apidologie 32: 341-353. doi: 10.1051/apido:2001134.
Gordon, D.M. (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 38: 121-124. doi:10.1038/380121a0.
Hart, A.G. (2013) Task partitioning: is it a useful concept? In: K. Sterenly, R. Joyce, & B. Calcott (Eds.), Cooperation and its Evolution (pp 203-221). Cambridge MA: MIT Press,.
Hart, A.G., Anderson, C. & Ratnieks F.L.W. (2002a) Task partitioning in leafcutting ants. Acta Ethol. 5: 1-11. doi:10.1007/s10211-002-0062-5.
Hart, A.G., Bot A.N.M. & Brown M.J.F. (2002b) A colony-level response to disease control in a leaf-cutting ant. Naturwissenchaften 89: 275-277. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0316-0
Hart, A.G. & Ratnieks F.L.W. (2001) Task partitioning, division of labour and nest compartmentalisation collectively isolate hazardous waste in the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 387-392. doi:10.1007/s002650000312.
Hart, A.G. & Ratnieks F.L.W. (2002a) Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Behav. Ecol. 13: 224-231. doi:10.1093/beheco/13.2.224.
Jackson, D.J. & Hart A.G. (2009) Does sanitation facilitate sociality? Animal Behav. 77: e1-e5. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.013.
Hart, A.G. & Ratnieks F.L.W. (2002b) Task-partitioned nectar transfer in stingless bees: work organization in a phylogenetic context. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 163-168. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00411.x
Jeanne R.L. (1986) The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monit. Zool. Ital. 20: 119-133.
Kerr A.S. & Kerr W.E. (1999) Melipona garbage bees release their cargo according to a gaussian distribution. Braz. Rev. Biol. 59: 119-123.
Kerr W.E. (1987) Biologia, manejo e genética de Melipona compressipes fasciculata Smith (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Tese de Professor Titular. Universidade Federal de Maranhão. Brasil. 141 pp.
Michener, C.D. (1974) The Social Behaviour of the Bees: a comparative study. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 404 p.
Michener, C.D. (2000) The Bees of the World. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 913 p.
Norusis, M. (2002) SPSS 11.0 Guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Paxton, R.J., Ruhnke H., Shah M., Bego L.R., Quezada-Euan J.J.G. & Ratnieks F.L.W. 2001. Social evolution of stingless bees: are the workers or is the queen in control of male parentage? 2nd Stingless Bee Seminar, Merida, Mexico, pp 104-107.
Ratnieks, F.L.W. & Anderson C. (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. Insectes Soc. 46: 95-108.
Robinson, G.E. (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 637-665.
Sakagami, S.F. (1982) Stingless bees. In R.H. Hermann (Eds.) Social Insects III (pp 361-423). Academic Press, London..
Schmid-Hempel, P. (1998) Parasites in Social Insects. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 409 p.
Seeley, T. D. (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 11: 287-293.
Seeley T.D. (1985) Honeybee Ecology: A study of adaptation in social life. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 201 p
Sommeijer, M.J. (1984) Distribution of labour among workers of Melipona favosa F.: age polyethism and worker oviposition. Insectes Soc. 31: 171-184.
Van Veen, J.W. & Arce, H.G. (1999) Nest and colony characteristic of log-hived Melipona beecheii (Apidae: Meliponinae). J. Apic. Res. 38: 43-48.
Visscher, P.K. (1983) The honey bee way of death: necrophoric behaviour in Apis mellifera colonies. Anim. Behav. 31: 1070-1076.
Wille, A. & Michener C.D. (1973) The nest architecture of the stingless bees with special reference to those of Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Tropic. 21: 1-278.
Zar, J. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 663 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).