Nestmate Recognition in the Amazonian Myrmecophyte Ant Pseudomyrmex concolor Smith (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)


  • Kleber Del-Claro Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Paulo S.M. Pacheco Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil. Federal University of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil



Amazonia, social insects, aggressiveness, chemical cues, kin selection


Nestmate recognition is fundamental to colonial cohesion in social insects, since it allows altruistic behavior towards relatives, recognition of intruders, territorial monopoly and resources defense. In ants, olfactory cues is a key factor in this process. Pseudomyrmex concolor is a highly aggressive ant that defends their host plant Tachigali myrmecophila against herbivores. However, this defense depends on the ant ability to discriminate in order to treat differentially between  members of their own colony and intruders . In this study we investigated “whether” and “how” P. concolor recognizes nestmates from non-nestmates. We hypothesized that P. concolor is skillful in recognizing nestmates and tested it in field with experiments using nestmates and non-nestmates. Additionally, to test the efficiency of resident ants against intraspecific competition during colony foundation, we simulate the plant occupation by a competitor queen, introducing non-nestmates queens in plants previously occupied by P. concolor. For the issue of the "how", we hypothesized that the main cue used by this ant in nestmate recognition is olfactory signal. Thus, we tested adaptive threshold model, which predicts that, if the individual odor and colony’s internal template are discrepant enough, the resident nestmate will behave aggressively towards incoming individuals. In this case, we confined nestmates with non-nestmates odors, and then, we reintroduced them in its host plants. In each experiment the frequency of aggressive behaviors were recorded and compared. Results showed that P. concolor recognize and discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates workers (biting and stinging them) and exclude potential competitors queens. Workers reintroduced in their own colony after impregnated with non-familiar odor were treated as non-nestmates. The adaptive threshold hypothesis was confirmed, the main cue used by this ant species in nestmate recognition is olfactory signals.


Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227-267.

Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., De Moraes Gonçalves, J.L. & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppenʼs climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22: 711-728.

Astruc, C., Malosse, C. & Errard, C. (2001). Lack of intraspecific aggression in the ant Tetramorium bicarinatum: A chemical hypothesis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27: 1229-1248.

Barnard, C.J., Aldhous, P. (1991). Kinship, kin discrimination and mate choice. In P. G. Hepper (Eds.), Kin recognition (pp.125-147). England: Cambridge University Press.

Beecher, M.D. (1982). Signature systems and kin recognition. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 22: 477-490.

Bos, N. & dʼEttorre, P. (2012). Recognition of social identity in ants. Frontiers in Psychology, 3: 1-6.

Breed, M.D. (2003). Nestmate Recognition Assays as a Tool for Population and Ecological Studies in Eusocial Insects. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 76: 539-550.

Breed, M.D. (2014). Kin and nestmate recognition: The influence of W. D. Hamilton on 50years of research. Animal Behaviour, 92: 271-279.

Breed, M.D. & Bennett, B. (1987). Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In D.J.C. Fletcher, & C. D. Michener (Eds.), Kin recognition in animals (pp. 243-285). J. Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Breed, M.D., & Page, R.E. (1991). Intra- and interspecific nestmate recognition in Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 4: 463-469.

Carlin, N.F. (1988). Discrimination Between and Within Colonies of Social Insects: Two Null Hypotheses. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 39: 86-100.

Carlin, N.F. & Hölldobler, B. (1983). Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science, 222: 1027-1029.

Carlin, N.F. & Hölldobler, B. (1986). The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.): I Hierarchical cues in small colonies. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 19: 123-124.

Carlin, N.F. & Hölldobler, B. (1987). The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) - II. Larger colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20: 209-217.

Crosland, M.W.J. (1990). Variation in ant aggression and kin descrimination ability with and between colonies. Journal of Insect Behavior, 3: 359-379.

Crozier, R.H. & Pamilo, P. (1996). Evolution of Social Insects Colonies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Del-Claro, K. & Tizo-Pedroso, E. (2009). Ecological and evolutionary pathways of social behavior in Pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones). Acta Ethologica, 12: 13-22.

Errard, C. & Hefetz, A. (1997). Label familiarity and discriminatory ability of ants reared in mixed groups. Insectes Sociaux, 44: 189-198.

Fonseca, C.R. (1994). Herbivory and the Long-Lived Leaves of an Amazonian Ant-Tree. Journal of Ecology, 82: 833-842.

Fonseca, C.R., Benson, W.W. (2003). Ontogenetic succession in Amazonian ant trees. Oikos, 102: 407-412.

Hamilton, W.D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behavior I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1-6.

Hamilton, W.D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behavior II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 17-52.

Hamilton, W.D. (1972). Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3: 193-232.

Hepper, P.G. (1986). Kin recognition: functions and mechanisms, a review. Biological Reviews, 61: 63-93.

Hölldobler, B. (1995). The chemistry of social regulation: multicomponent signals in ant societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92: 19-22.

Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Jaffé, K., Lopez, M.E. & Aragort, W. (1986). On the communication systems of the ants Pseudomyrmex termitarius and P. triplarinus. Insectes Sociaux, 33: 105-117.

Janzen, D.H. (1967). Interaction of the bull's horn acacia (Acacia cornigera L.) with an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea F. Smith) in eastern Mexico. Kansas, USA: University of Kansas Publications.

Janzen, D.H. (1973). Evolution of polygynous obligate acacia-ants in western Mexico. Journal of Animal Ecology, 42: 727-750.

Johnson, B.R., Van Wilgenburg, E. & Tsutsui, N.D. (2012). Nestmate recognition in social insects is sometimes more complex than an individual based decision to accept or reject. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66: 343–346.

Jungnickel, H., Da Costa, A.J.S., Tentschert, J., Patricio, E.F.L.R.A., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L., Drijfhout, F. & Morgan, E.D. (2004). Chemical basis for inter-colonial aggression in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona bipunctata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 50: 761-766.

Katzav-Gozansky, T., Boulay, R., Ionescu-Hirsh, A. & Hefetz, A. (2008). Nest volatiles as modulators of nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah. Journal of Insect Physiology, 54: 378-385.

Lockey, K. H. (1988). Lipids of the insect cuticle: origin, composition and function. Comparative biochemistry and physiology, 89: 595-645.

Mintzer, A. (1982). Nestmate recognition and incompatibility between colonies of the acacia-ant Pseudomyrmex ferruginea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10: 165-168.

Mintzer, A. & Vinson, S.B. (1985). Kinship and incompatibility between colonies of the acacia ant Pseudomyrmex ferruginea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17: 75-78.

Nascimento, F.S., Tannure-Nascimento, I.C., Dantas, J.O., Turatti, I.C. & Lopes, N.P. (2013). Task-Related Variation of Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profiles Affect Nestmate Recognition in the Giant ant Dinoponera quadriceps. Journal of Insect Behavior, 26: 212-222.

Newey, P. (2011). Not one odour but two: A new model for nestmate recognition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 270: 7-12.

Nunes, T.M., Nascimento, F.S., Turatti, I.C., Lopes, N.P. & Zucchi, R. (2008). Nestmate recognition in a stingless bee: does the similarity of chemical cues determine guard acceptance? Animal Behaviour, 75: 1165-1171.

Nunes, T. M., Turantti, I. C. C., & Mateus, S. (2009). Cuticular hydrocarbons in the stingless bee Scharziana quandripunctata (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini): differences between colonies, castes and age. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8: 589-595.

Oliveira, P.S., Oliveira-Filho, A.T., Cintra, R. (1987). Ant foraging on ant-inhabited Triplaris (Polygonaceae) in western Brazil: a field experiment using live termite-baits. Journal of Tropical Ecology.1987, 3:193–200.

Sheehan, M.J. & Tibbetts, E. A. (2011). Specialized Face Learning Is Associated with Individual Recognition in Paper Wasps. Science, 334: 1272-1275.Sherman, P. W., & Holmes, W. G. (1985). Kin recognition: issues and evidence. Fortschritte der Zoologie, 31: 437-460

Sherman, P. W., Reeve, H. K. & Pfennig, D. W. (1997). Recognition systems. In J. R. Krebs, & N.B. Davis (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 69-96). Oxford, UK.: Blackwell.

Smith, F. (1860). Descriptions of new genera and species of exotic Hymenoptera. Journal of Entomology, 2: 65-84.

Starks, P.T. (2004). Recognition systems (Special issue). Annales Zoologici Fennici. 41: 689-892.

Starks, P.T., Watson, R.E., Dipaola, M.J. & Dipaola, C.P. (1998). The effect of queen number on nestmate discrimination in the facultatively polygynous ant Pseudomyrmex pallidus (Hymenoptera : Formicidae). Ethology, 104: 573-584.

Sturgis, S.J. & Gordon, D.M. (2012). Nestmate recognition in ants (Hymenoptera : Formicidae): a review. Biological Invasions, 16: 101-110.

Sudd, J.H. & Franks, N.R. (1987). The behavioural ecology of ants (1st ed.). USA, Chapman & Hall.

Tibbetts, E.A. & Sheehan, M.J. (2011). Facial Patterns are a Conventional Signal of Agonistic Ability in Polistes exclamans Paper Wasps. Ethology, 117: 1138-1146.

Tizo-Pedroso, E. & Del-Claro, K. (2007). Cooperation in the neotropical pseudoscorpion, Paratemnoides nidificator (Balzan, 1888): Feeding and dispersal behavior. Insectes Sociaux, 54: 124-131.

Tizo-Pedroso, E. & Del-Claro, K. (2014). Social parasitism: emergence of the cuckoo

strategy between pseudoscorpions. Behavioral Ecology, 25: 335–343.

Van Zweden, J. S. & D’ettorre, P. (2010). Nestmate recognition in social insects and role of hydrocarbons. In Blomquist, G.J (Eds.), Insect Hydrocarbons Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology (pp. 222-243). England: Cambridge University Press.

Vander Meer, R.K.V. & Alonso, L.E. (1998). Pheromone directed behavior in ants. In R.K. Vander Meer, M.D. Breed, K.E. Espelie & M.L.P. Winston (Eds.), Pheromone communication in social insects (pp.159-191). USA: Westview Press.

Wallis, D.I. (1970). Aggression in social insects. In C.H. Southwick, (Eds), Animal aggression: selected readings (94-102). New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,

Ward, P.S. & Downie, D.A. (2005). The ant subfamily Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Phylogeny and evolution of big-eyed arboreal ants. Systematic Entomology, 30: 310-335.

Wheeler, W.M. (1921). The Tachigali ants. Zoologica, 3: 137- 168.

Wilson, E.O. (1971). The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Belknap Press, Harvard University.




How to Cite

Del-Claro, K., & Pacheco, P. S. (2015). Nestmate Recognition in the Amazonian Myrmecophyte Ant Pseudomyrmex concolor Smith (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiology, 62(3), 356–363.



Research Article - Ants

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>