Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of APA Pandeiros: A Perspective from a Decade of Research in an Environmental Protection Area in the Cerrado-Caatinga Transition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v69i3.7878Keywords:
ant inventories, ecological role, open vegetation, Neotropical savannas, Tropical dry forestAbstract
Habitat transformation and species loss bring enormous environmental damage, whereas establishing protected areas promotes more sustainable use of environmental resources through biodiversity conservation. In this study, we aimed to point out gaps in ant knowledge and provide a species checklist that contributes to biodiversity conservation in the transition areas between Cerrado and Caatinga biomes, constantly threatened by land use changes. This checklist integrates data from previous studies developed at “Área de Proteção Ambiental do Rio Pandeiros” (APA Pandeiros), Minas Gerais, Brazil, involving ant diversity and their contribution to ecological processes accessed and described in the studies. We showed and discussed how authors managed and provided information regarding methodologies and habitats sampled. We listed 143 ant species formally named. Pheidole, Camponotus and Cephalotes were the most speciose genera, with more than ten species each. Among ants involved in ecological processes, 40 are linked to diaspore removal (part of seed dispersal) and 30 to carcass interaction (part of the decomposition process). Unbaited pitfall traps, epigeic stratum and Cerrado sensu stricto, were the top sampling method, stratum, and habitats among ant studies. We presented proposals for the best management and integration of data from surveys in APA Pandeiros (e.g., sharing the results of the studies with the APA managers, creating a database, and the local community). These surveys are fundamental for understanding biodiversity and ecological processes and provide valuable information to conservation biology. Therefore, neglecting the importance of the Cerrado-Caatinga transition can lead to irreparable setbacks for scientific knowledge and biodiversity.
Downloads
References
Agosti D,, Majer J.D., Alonso, L.E. & Schultz, T.R. (2000). Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 280 p.
Asaad, I., Lundquist, C.J., Erdmann, M.V. & Costello, M.J. (2017). Ecological criteria to identify areas for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 213: 309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon. 2016.10.007
Baccaro, F.B., Feitosa, R.M., Fernández, F., Fernandes, I.O., Izzo, T.J., Souza, J.L.P. & Solar, R.R.C. (2015). Guia para gêneros de formigas do Brasil. Manaus: Ed. INPA, 338 p. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.32912
Barlow, J., Lennox, G.D., Ferreira, J., Berenguer, E., Lees, A.C., Nally, R.M., et al. (2016). Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature, 535: 144-147. doi: 10.1038/nature18326
Borges, P.P., de Andrade Oliveira, K.A.F., Machado, K.B., Vaz, U.L., da Cunha, H.F. & Nabout, J.C. (2015). Tendências e lacunas da literatura científica sobre o bioma Cerrado: uma análise cienciométrica. Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 10: 2-8. doi: 10.4013/nbc.2015.101.01
Brasil (2000). Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação – SNUC. Brasília: Diário oficial de 19/07/2000. <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9985.htm>, retrieved on 11 March 2022.
Camacho, G.P. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2015). Ants of the Panga Ecological Station, a Cerrado reserve in central Brazil. Sociobiology, 62: 281-295. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v62i2. 281-295
Câmara, T., Leal, I.R., Blüthgen, N., Oliveira, F.M., Queiroz, R.T.D. & Arnan, X. (2018). Effects of chronic anthropogenic disturbance and rainfall on the specialization of ant–plant mutualistic networks in the Caatinga, a Brazilian dry forest. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87: 1022-1033. doi: 10.1111/1365-26 56.12820
Christianini, A.V. (2015). Dispersão de sementes por ponero-morfas. In: Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.D.S.F. & Majer, J.D. (Eds.) As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil. Ilhéus: SciELO-Editus-Editora da UESC, p. 345-360.
Costa, F.V., Mello, R., Lana, T.C. & Neves, F.S. (2015). Ant fauna in megadiverse mountains: a checklist for the rocky grasslands. Sociobiology, 62: 228-245. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v62i2. 228-245
Delabie, J.H.C., Alves, H.S.R., Franca, V.C., Martins, T.D.A. & Nascimento, I.C. (2007). Biogeografia das formigas predadoras do gênero Ectatomma (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae) no leste da Bahia e Regioes vizinhas. Agrotrópica (Brasil), 19: 13-20.
Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.D.S.F. & Majer, J.D. (2015). As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil. SciELO-Editus-Editora da UESC, Ilhéus, 477 p.
Del-Toro, I., Ribbons, R.R. & Pelini SL (2012). The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hym.: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 17: 133-46.
Divieso, R., Rorato, A., Feitosa, R.M., Meyer, A.L. & Pie, M.R. (2020). How to prioritize areas for new ant surveys? Integrating historical data on species occurrence records and habitat loss. Journal of Insect Conservation, 24: 901-911. doi: 10.1007/s 10841-020-00262-y
Elizalde, L., Arbetman, M., Arnan, X., Eggleton, P., Leal, I.R., Lescano, M.N., et al. (2020). The ecosystem services provided by social insects: traits, management tools and knowledge gaps. Biological Reviews, 95: 1418-1441. doi: 10.1111/brv.12616
Feitosa, R.M., Camacho, G.P., Silva, T.S., Ulysséa, M.A., Ladino, N., Oliveira, A.M., et al. (2022). Ants of Brazil: an overview based on 50 years of diversity studies. Systematics and Biodiversity, 20: 2089268. doi: 10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268
Fernandez, F., Guerrero, R.J., Sanchez-Restrepo, A.F. (2021). Systematics and diversity of Neotropical ants. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 47: e11082. doi: 10.25100/socolen.v47i1.11082
Ganem, R.S. (2017). Caatinga: estratégias de conservação. Estudo Técnico. Consultoria Legislativa.
Guimarães-Silva, R. (2019). Spatial strategies for Cerrado biome conservation: a multiscale approach. UFLA, 110 p. Thesis.
IEF-MG. Instituto Estadual de Florestas de Minas Gerais (2019). Plano de Manejo do Refúgio Estadual de Vida Silvestre do Rio Pandeiros – REVSRP.
IEF-MG. Instituto Estadual de Florestas de Minas Gerais (2022). APA Pandeiros , retrieved on 11 March 2022.
Janicki, J., Narula, N., Ziegler, M., Guénard, B. & Economo, E.P. (2016). Visualizing and interacting with large-volume biodiversity data using client-server web-mapping applications: The design and implementation of ant maps.org. Ecological Informatics, 32: 185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.02.006
Kempf, W.W. (1961). A survey of the ants of the soil fauna in Surinam (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 4: 481-524.
Leal, I.R., Lopes, A.V., Machado, I.C. & Tabarelli, M .(2018). Interações planta-animal na Caatinga: visão geral e perspectivas futuras. Ciência e Cultura, 70: 35-40. doi: 10.21 800/2317-66602018000400011
Leal, I.R., Ribeiro-Neto, J.D., Arnan, X., Oliveira, F.M., Arcoverde, G.B., Feitosa, R.M. & Andersen, A.N. (2017). Ants of the Caatinga: diversity, biogeography, and functional responses to anthropogenic disturbance and climate change. In: Silva, J.M.C., Leal, I.R. & Tabarelli, M. (Eds.) Caatinga. The largest tropical dry forest region in South America. Springer, p. 65-95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68339-3_3
Leal, L.C., Neto, M.C.L., de Oliveira, A.F.M., Andersen, A.N. & Leal, I.R. (2014). Myrmecochores can target high-quality disperser ants: variation in elaiosome traits and ant preferences for myrmecochorous Euphorbiaceae in Brazilian Caatinga. Oecologia, 174: 493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2789-2
Lessa, T., Dos Santos, J.W., Correia, R.A., Ladle, R.J. & Malhado, A.C. (2019). Known unknowns: Filling the gaps in scientific knowledge production in the Caatinga. PlosOne, 14: e0219359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219359
Lewinsohn, T.M., Freitas, A.V.L. & Prado, P.I. (2005). Conservação de invertebrados terrestres e seus habitats no Brasil. Megadiversidade, 1: 62-69.
Magalhães, V.B., Espírito-Santo, N.B., Salles, L.F., Soares Jr., H. & Oliveira, O.S. (2018). Secondary seed dispersal by ants in Neotropical cerrado savanna: species-specific effects on seeds and seedlings of Siparuna guianensis (Siparunaceae). Ecological Entomology, 43: 665-674. doi: 10.1111/een.12640.
Marques, T. & Schoereder, J.H. (2014). Ant diversity partitioning across spatial scales: Ecological processes and implications for conserving Tropical Dry Forests. Austral Ecology, 39: 72-82. doi: 10.1111/aec.12046
Marques, T.E.D., Castaño-Meneses, G., Mariano, C.S.F. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2015). Interações entre Poneromorfas e fontes de açúcar na vegetação. In: Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.D.S.F. & Majer, J.D. (Eds.) As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil. SciELO-Editus-Editora da UESC, Ilhéus, p. 361-374.
McManus, C. & Baeta Neves, A.A. (2021). Production Profiles in Brazilian Science, with special attention to social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 126: 2413-2435. doi: 10.1007s11 192-020-03452-2
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A., Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858. doi: 10.1038/35002501
Neves, F.S., Queiroz-Dantas, K.S., Da Rocha, W.D. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2013). Ants of three adjacent habitats of a transition region between the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes: the effects of heterogeneity and variation in canopy cover. Neotropical Entomology, 42: 258-268. doi: 10.1007/s13744-013-0123-7
Nunes, Y.R.F., Azevedo, I.F.P., Neves, W.V., Veloso, M.D.D.M., Souza, R. & Fernandes, G.W. (2009). Pandeiros: o pantanal mineiro. MG Biota, 2: 4-17.
Oliveira, F.M., Andersen, A.N., Arnan, X., Ribeiro-Neto, J.D., Arcoverde, G.B. & Leal, I.R. (2019). Effects of increasing aridity and chronic anthropogenic disturbance on seed dispersal by ants in Brazilian Caatinga. Journal of Animal Ecology, 88: 870-880. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12979
Oliveira, P.S. & Marquis, R.J. (2002). The Cerrados of Brazil; New York: Columbia University Press, 396 p.
Oliveira, U., Soares-Filho, B.S. Paglia, A.P., Brescovit, A.D., De Carvalho, C.J.B., Silva, D.P., et al. (2017). Biodiversity conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas. Scientific Reports, 7: 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08707-2
Overbeck, G.E., Bergallo, H.G., Grelle, C.E., Akama, A., Bravo, F., Colli, G.R., et al. (2018). Global biodiversity threatened by science budget cuts in Brazil. BioScience, 68: 11-12. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix130
Overbeck, G.E., Vélez-Martin, E., Scarano, F.R., Lewinsohn, T.M., Fonseca, C.R., Meyer, S.T., et al. (2015). Conservation in Brazil needs to include non-forest ecosystems. Diversity and Distributions, 21: 1455-1460. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12380
Padilha, M.A. (2013). Remoção de sementes por formigas: efeito do tamanho da semente, hábitat e riqueza de espécies. UFV, 110 p. Thesis.
Philpott, S.M., Perfecto, I., Armbrecht, I. & Parr, C.L. (2010). Ant diversity and function in disturbed and changing habitats. Ant Ecology, 1: 137-156. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/97801995446 39.003.0008
Prado, L.P.D., Feitosa, R.M., Triana, S.P., Gutiérrez, J.A.M., Rousseau, G.X., Silva, R.A., et al. (2019). An overview of the ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the state of Maranhão, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 59. doi: 10.11606/1807-0205/ 2019.59.38
Queiroz, A.C.M., Rabello, A.M., Braga, D.L., Santiago, G.S., Zurlo, L.F., Philpott, S. & Ribas, C.R. (2020). Cerrado vegetation types determine how land use impacts ant biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29: 2017-2034. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1379-8
Queiroz, A.C.M., Wilker, I., Lasmar, C.J., Mousinho, E., Ribas, C.R. & van den Berg, E. (2021). No matter where you are, ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) get attention when it is warm. Myrmecological News, 31: 71-83. doi: 10.25849/myrmecol.news_031:071
Queiroz-Dantas, K.S., Queiroz, A.C.M., Neves, F.S., Júnior, R.R. & Fagundes, M. (2011). Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em diferentes estratos numa região de transição entre os biomas do Cerrado e da Caatinga no norte de Minas Gerais. MG Biota, 4: 17-36.
Rabelo, M.A., Angotti, M.A., Santiago, G.S., Reis, A.C. & Ribas, C.R. (2021). Removal of diaspores by ants: What factors to evaluate? Acta Oecologica, 111: 103736. doi: 10.1016/j.actao. 2021.103736
Rizzini, C.T. (1997). Tratado de fitogeografia do Brasil: aspectos ecológicos (Vol. 2). São Paulo: Hucitec, Edusp.
Santiago, G.S., Rabelo, M.A., Canedo-Júnior, E.O. & Ribas C.R. (2020). Formigas removedoras de sementes apresentam potencial para auxiliar na regeneração de áreas impactadas. MG Biota, 12: 44-54.
Schmidt, F.A., Ribas, C.R., Feitosa, RM., Baccaro, F.B., Queiroz, A.C.M., Sobrinho, T., et al. (2022). Ant diversity studies in Brazil: an overview of the myrmecological research in a megadiverse country. Insectes Sociaux, 69: 105-121. doi: 10.1007/s00040-022-00848-6
Schmidt, F.A., Ribas, C.R. & Schoereder, J.H. (2013). How predictable is the response of ant assemblages to natural forest recovery? Implications for their use as bioindicators. Ecological Indicators, 24: 158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.031
Silva, R.R., Martello, F., Feitosa, R.M., Silva, O.G.M., Prado, L.P., Brandão, C.R.F. et al. (2022). ATLANTIC ANTS: a data set of ants in Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology, 103: e03580. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3580
Tabor, K.L., Fell, R.D. & Brewster, C.C. (2005). Insect fauna visiting carrion in Southwest Virginia. Forensic Science International, 150: 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.041
Tedesco, P.A., Bigorne, R., Bogan, A.E., Giam, X., Jézéquel, C. & Hugueny, B. (2014). Estimating how many undescribed species have gone extinct. Conservation Biology, 28: 1360-1370. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12285
Ulysséa, M.A. & Brandão, C.R. (2013). Ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the seasonally dry tropical forest of northeastern Brazil: a compilation from field surveys in Bahia and literature records. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 57: 217-224. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262013005000002
Vasconcelos, H.L., Maravalhas, J.B., Feitosa, R.M., Pacheco, R., Neves, K.C. & Andersen, A.N. (2018). Neotropical savanna ants show a reversed latitudinal gradient of species richness, with climatic drivers reflecting the forest origin of the fauna. Journal of Biogeography, 45: 248-258. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13113
Venter, O., Magrach, A., Outram, N., Klein, C.J., Possingham, H.P., Di Marco, M. & Watson, J.E. (2018). Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions. Conservation Biology, 32: 127-134. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12970
Vieira, R.R., Pressey, R.L. & Loyola, R. (2019). The residual nature of protected areas in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 233: 152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.010
Wang, C., Strazanac, J. & Butler, L. (2001). A comparison of pitfall traps with bait traps for studying leaf litter ant communities. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94: 761-765. doi: 10.1603/ 0022-0493-94.3.761
Wild, A.L. (2007). Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Linepithema (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (Vol. 126). University of California Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Cesar Medeiros de Queiroz, Livia Pires do Prado, Rafael Almeida Cesarino, Graziele S. Santiago, Cynthia Valéria Oliveira, Mariana A. Rabelo, Carla R. Ribas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).