Induced biotic response in Amazonian ant-plants: the role of leaf damage intensity and plant-derived food rewards on ant recruitment

Thiago Gonçalves-Souza

Abstract


Although plant-ants respond to cues indicating the presence of herbivores, it remains unclear how ant workers are stimulated by herbivory cues with varying intensity. I hypothesized that ants respond more quickly to intense foliar damage, and ants inhabiting myrmecophytes that provide food resource recruit workers to any intensity of foliar damage. I tested the induced response in three ant-plant systems: two that provide food resources and another one that does not provide. I simulated leaf damage using different concentrations of foliar extracts. In all systems the plant-ant recruitment increased after damage simulations. In food providing system ants did not distinguish between different intensity damages, although one system have shown a mixed response to that intensity. This result indicates that ants defend more intensely their host plant to avoid damages that diminish food provisioning. In the non-food providing system ants responded more quickly to simulation of high foliar damage. This faster recruitment to leaves with high damage suggests that ants are searching for hot spots that potentially have more insects for feeding on. I suggested that future works could manipulate plant size and quality, and food provisioning to better understand why mutual ant-plant systems with very distinct characteristics are evolutionarily stabilized.

Keywords


myrmecophytes, herbivory, protective mutualism, Ant–plant interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agrawal, A.A. (1998). Leaf damage and associated cues induce aggressive ant recruitment in a Neotropical ant-plant. Ecology, 79: 2100-2112.

Agrawal, A.A. & Rutter, M.T. (1998). Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos, 83: 227-236.

Bronstein, J.L. (1998). The contribution of ant-plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica, 30: 150-161.

Bronstein, J.L., Alarcón, R. & Geber, M. (2006). The evolution of plant-insect mutualism. New Phytologist, 172: 412-428. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x

Bruna, E.M., Lapola, D.M. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2004). Interespecific variation in the defensive responses of obligate plant-ants: experimental tests and consequences for herbivory. Oecologia, 138: 558-565. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1455-5

Christianini, A.V. & Machado, G. (2004). Induced biotic responses to herbivory and associated cues in the Amazonian ant-plant Maieta poeppigii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 112: 81-88. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00188.x

Fonseca, C.R. & Ganade, G. (1996). Asymmetries, compartments and null interactions in an Amazonian ant-plant community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65: 339-347.

Fonseca, C.R. (1999). Amazonian ant-plant interactions and the nesting space limitation hypothesis. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 15:807–825.

Heil, M. & Mckey, D. (2003). Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 425-453. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132410

Heil, M., Fiala, B., Linsenmair, K.E., Zotz, G. & Menke, P. (1997). Food body production in Macaranga triloba (Euphorbiaceae): a plant investment in anti-herbivore defense via symbiotic ant partners. Journal of Ecology, 85: 847-861.

Itino, T., Otioka, T., Hatada, A. & Hamid, A.A. (2001). Effects of food rewards offered by ant-plant Macaranga on the colony size of ants. Ecological Research, 16: 775-786. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00433.x

Izzo, T.J. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2002). Cheating the cheater: domatia loss minimizes the effects of ant castration in an Amazonian ant-plant. Oecologia, 133: 200-205. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1027-0

Izzo, T.J. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2005). Ants and plant size shape the structure of the arthropod community of Hirtella myrmecophila, an Amazonian ant-plant. Ecological Entomology, 30: 650-656. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00736.x

Lapola, D.M., Bruna, E.M. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2003). Contrasting responses to induction cues by ants inhabiting Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae). Biotropica, 35: 295-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00288.x

Lovejoy, T.E. & Bierregaard, R.O. (1990). Central Amazonian forests and the minimum critical size of ecosystem project. In Gentry AH (ed.), Four Neotropical rainforests (pp 60-70). Yale University Press, New York.

Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Rico-Gray, V. & Oliveira, P.S. (2007). The ecology and evolution on ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Risch, S.J. & Rickson, F.R. (1981). Mutualism in which ants must be present before plants produce food bodies. Nature, 291: 149-150.

Romero, G.Q. & Izzo, T.J. (2004). Leaf damage induces ant recruitment in the Amazonian ant-plant Hirtella myrmecophila. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20: 675-682. doi: 10.1017/S0266467404001749

Trager, M.T. & Bruna, E.M. (2006). Effects of plant age, experimental nutrition and ant occupancy on herbivory in a neotropical myrmecophyte. Journal of Ecology, 94: 1156-1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01165.x

Vasconcelos, H.L. (1991). Mutualism between Maieta guianensis Aubl., a myrmecophytic melastome, and one of its ant inhabitants: ant protection against herbivores. Oecologia, 87: 295-298.

Vasconcelos, H.L. (1993). Ant colonization of Maieta guianensis seedlings, an Amazon ant-plant. Oecologia, 95: 439-443.

Vasconcelos, H.L. & Davidson, D.W. (2000). Relationship between plant size and ant associates in two Amazonian ant-plants. Biotropica, 32: 100-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00452.x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i3.1050

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JCR Impact Factor 2018: 0.604