An Updated Guide to Study Polyandry in Social Insects

Rodolfo Jaffé

Abstract


In spite of the importance of understanding the adaptive significance of polyandry in the social Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps), little consensus exists regarding the terminology employed, the use of different paternity estimates, the calculation of such estimates and their associated error measures, and the way paternity should be treated in comparative studies. Here I summarize previous methodological contributions to the study of polyandry in social insects, hoping that such a compendium will serve as an updated guide to future researchers. I first revise the estimates describing queen mating behavior and paternity outcomes in polyandrous social insects, outlining appropriate methods for calculating them. I then address the errors associated to paternity estimates and explain how to account for them. Finally I discuss in which cases paternity should be treated as a continuous or a categorical variable, and provide an insight into the distribution of paternity across the social Hymenoptera. This technical review highlights the importance of standardizing research methods to prevent common errors, raise confidence in the reported data, and facilitate comparisons between studies, to help shed light into many unanswered questions.


Keywords


effective paternity; multiple mating; multiple paternity; polyandry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11 (10):697-709

Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21 (6):296-302. doi:S0169-5347(06)00102-9 [pii]

1016/j.tree.2006.03.015

Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145-164. doi:DOI 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446

Baer B (2011) The copulation biology of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 14:55-68

Baer B, Armitage SAO, Boomsma JJ (2006) Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature 441 (7095):872-875

Baer B, Morgan ED, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) A nonspecific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98 (7):3926-3928. doi:10.1073/pnas.061027998

Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (1999) Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397 (6715):151-154. doi:10.1038/16451

Bienefeld K, Ehrhardt K, Reinhardt F (2008) Bee breeding around the world - Noticeable success in honey bee selection after the introduction of genetic evaluation using BLUP. Am Bee J 148 (8):739-742

Boomsma JJ (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 364 (1533):3191-3207. doi:DOI 10.1098/rstb.2009.0101

Boomsma JJ (2013) Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368 (1613). doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0050

Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 50:395-420. doi:DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130416

Boomsma JJ, Kronauer DJC, Pedersen JS (2009) The evolution of social insect mating systems. In: Gadau J, Fewell J, Wilson EO (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 3-25

Boomsma JJ, Ratnieks FLW (1996) Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 351 (1342):947-975

Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12 (2):245-257. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00028.x

Cornuet J-M, Aries F (1980) Number of sex alleles in a sample of honeybee colonies. Apidologie 11 (1):87-93

Crozier RH, Fjerdingstad EJ (2001) Polyandry in social Hymenoptera - disunity in diversity? Ann Zool Fenn 38 (3-4):267-285

Den Boer SPA, Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2010) Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science 327 (5972):1506-1509. doi:10.1126/science.1184709

den Boer SPA, Boomsma JJ, Baer B (2009) Honey bee males and queens use glandular secretions to enhance sperm viability before and after storage. J Insect Physiol 55 (6):538-543

Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Ellegren H (2013) Genome sequencing and population genomics in non-model organisms. Trends Ecol Evol in press (0). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.008

Foster KR, Seppä P, Ratnieks FL, Thorén PA (1999) Low paternity in the hornet Vespa crabro indicates that multiple mating by queens is derived in vespine wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46 (4):252-257

Hamilton WD (1964) Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour I & II. J Theor Biol 7 (1):1-16, 17-52

Hughes WOH, Boomsma J (2008) Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105 (13):5150-5153. doi:DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710262105

Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ (2006) Does genetic diversity hinder parasite evolution in social insect colonies? J Evol Biol 19 (1):132-143. doi:DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00979.x

Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008a) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320 (5880):1213-1216. doi:DOI 10.1126/science.1156108

Hughes WOH, Ratnieks FLW, Oldroyd BP (2008b) Multiple paternity or multiple queens: two routes to greater intracolonial genetic diversity in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 21 (4):1090-1095. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01532.x

Hughes WOH, Sumner S, Van Borm S, Boomsma JJ (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100 (16):9394-9397. doi:DOI 10.1073/pnas.1633701100

Human H, Brodschneider R, Dietemann V, Dively G, Ellis JD, Forsgren E, Fries I, Hatjina F, Hu FL, Jaffé R, Bruun Jensen AB, Köhler A, Magyar JP, Özkýrým A, Pirk CWW, Robyn Rose R, Strauss U, Tanner G, Tarpy DR, van der Steen JJM, Vaudo A, Fleming Vejsnæs F, Wilde J, Williams GR, Zheng HQ (2013) Miscellaneous standard methods for Apis mellifera research. J Apic Res 52 (4):1-56. doi:10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.10

Jaffé R, Garcia-Gonzalez F, den Boer SPA, Simmons LW, Baer B (2012) Patterns of paternity skew among polyandrous social insects: What can they tell us about the potential for sexual selection? Evolution 66 (12):3778-3788. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01721.x

Jaffé R, Kronauer DJ, Kraus FB, Boomsma JJ, Moritz RFA (2007) Worker caste determination in the army ant Eciton burchellii. Biology Letters 3 (5):513-516. doi:WR72833283774478 [pii]

1098/rsbl.2007.0257

Keller L, Reeve HK (1994) Genetic Variability, Queen Number, and Polyandry in Social Hymenoptera. Evolution 48 (3):694-704

Kraus FB, Moritz RF (2010) Extreme polyandry in social Hymenoptera: evolutionary causes and consequences for colony organisation. In: Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Springer, pp 413-439

Kvarnemo C, Simmons LW (2013) Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368 (1613). doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0042

Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2007) Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science 317 (5836):362-364. doi:DOI 10.1126/science.1143046

Moilanen A, Sundstroem L, Pedersen JS (2004) MATESOFT: a program for deducing parental genotypes and estimating mating system statistics in haplodiploid species. Mol Ecol Notes 4 (4):795-797

Moritz RFA, Michael H, Lattorff G, Neumann P, Kraus FB, Radloff SE, Hepburn HR (2005) Rare royal families in honeybees, Apis mellifera. Naturwissenschaften 92 (11):548-548. doi:DOI 10.1007/s00114-005-0054-1

Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve HK (2003) Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol 12 (11):3157-3164. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01994.x

Nonacs P (2000) Measuring and Using Skew in the Study of Social Behavior and Evolution. Am Nat 156 (6):577-589

Nonacs P (2003) Measuring the reliability of skew indices: is there one best index? Anim Behav 65 (3):615-627

Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH (2007) Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 22 (8):408-413. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.001

Page RE, Metcalf RA (1982) Multiple mating, sperm utilization, and social evolution. Am Nat 119 (2):263-281

Palmer KA, Oldroyd BP (2000) Evolution of multiple mating in the genus Apis. Apidologie 31 (2):235-248

Pamilo P (1993) Polyandry and allele frequency differences between the sexes in the ant Formica aquilonia. Heredity 70 (5):472-480

Richards MH, French D, Paxton RJ (2005) It's good to be queen: classically eusocial colony structure and low worker fitness in an obligately social sweat bee. Mol Ecol 14 (13):4123-4133. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02724.x

Sanetra M, Crozier RH (2001) Polyandry and colony genetic structure in the primitive ant Nothomyrmecia macrops. J Evol Biol 14 (3):368-378. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00294.x

Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

Seeley TD, Tarpy DR (2007) Queen promiscuity lowers disease within honeybee colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274 (1606):67-72. doi:DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3702

Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

Smith CR, Toth AL, Suarez AV, Robinson GE (2008) Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nature Reviews: Genetics 9 (10):735-748. doi:Doi 10.1038/Nrg2429

Wenseleers T, Ratnieks Francis LW (2006) Comparative Analysis of Worker Reproduction and Policing in Eusocial Hymenoptera Supports Relatedness Theory. Am Nat 168 (6):E163-E179. doi:10.1086/508619




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.1-8

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JCR Impact Factor 2018: 0.604