Morphological Characterization and Molecular Mediated Genetic Variation of Thief Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Shripat T. Kamble

Abstract


The morphological characterization and molecular genetic variation were determined in populations of thief ants, Solenopsis molesta (Say). The genetic variations were elucidated using mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mDNA) sequences of cytochrome oxidase I. DNA from thief ants was extracted with Qiagen’s Gentra PUREGENE® DNA Isolation Kit using their solid tissue protocol. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were run on the extracted DNA using primers Lep-F1 (forward) and Lep-R1 (reverse). The DNA products were concentrated and purified by Microcon Centrifugal Filter Unit YM-100. Purified DNA samples were sequenced at the University of Arkansas Medical Sciences (UAMS) DNA Sequencing Core Facility. The sequences were edited and aligned using Codon Code Aligner. The contigs wee uploaded to www.Phylogeny.fr and phylogenetic trees were produced (Neighbor joining, Maximum likelihood and Bayesian). The trees displayed variation in genetic makeup of the thief ants from various geographic regions and genetic variation corresponded to the morphologic identification. The thief ants collected from different states were separated into three groups. Ants collected from New York, Indiana and one location in Nebraska formed one group identified as S. molesta validiuscula, a second group formed with ants from Louisiana identified as S. carolinensis and the third group consisted of ants from South Dakota, Washington, New Jersey Tennessee, Kansas and two other locations in Nebraska identified as S. molesta molesta.


Keywords


Thief ants; Solenopsis sp., morphology; molecular genetics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, G.W., J.M. Owens & R.M. Corrigan. 2005. Truman’s scientific guide to pest management operations. 6th Ed. Purdue University/Questex Media. West Lafayette, IN.

Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Creighton, W.S. 1950. The ants of North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College, 104: 1-585.

Dereeper, A., V. Guignon, G. Blanc, S. Audic, S. Buffet, F. Chevenet, J.F. Dufayard, S. Guindon, V. Lefort, M. Lescot, J.M. Claverie & O. Gascuel. 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36 (Web Server issue):W465-9. Epub 2008 Apr 19.

Field, H.C., W.E. Evans Sr., R. Hartley, L.D. Hensen & J.H. Klotz. 2007. A Survey of Structural Ant Pests in the Southwestern U.S.A. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology. 49: 151-164.

Forel, A. 1901. Variétés myrmécologiques. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique. 45: 334-382.

Hayes, W.P. 1920. Solenopis molesta Say (Hym.) A biological study. Kansas Agric. Expt. Stat. Tech. Bull. no. 7: 1–50.

Hooper-Bui, L. 2010. Identification of thief ants from Louisiana. Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. Personal Communication May 17, 2010.

Husen, T.J., N.A. Spomer, R. Narain, S.T. Kamble, D. Branscome, E. Roper & B. Cartwright. 2008. Efficacy of Optigard® Flex, Termidor® SC, and I maxXPro® 2F Against Selected Nuisance Ants (odorous house, pavement, and thief ) When Applied as Perimeter Treatments. Arthropod Management Tests. 34: 6.

Invitrogen. 2010. Invetrogen 100bp DNA Ladder (Cat. No 15628-19) technical support guide http://tools.invitrogen.com/content/sfs/manuals/15628019.pdf

Klotz, J., L. Hansen, R. Pospischil & M. Rust. 2008. Urban ants of North America and Europe: Identification, Biology and Management. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY.

Krieger, M.J.B. & K.G. Ross. 2003. Molecular Evolutionary Analyses of mariners and other transposable elements in Fire Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Mol. Biol. 12: 155-165.

Krieger, M.J.B. & K.G. Ross. 2005. Molecular Evolutionary Analyses of the Odorant-Binding Protein Gene Gp-9 in Fire Ants and Other Solenopsis Species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 2090–2103.

Pacheco, J.A. 2007. The New World Thief Ants of the Genus Solenopsis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX.

Rhoades, R.B., W.L. Schafer, W.H. Schmid, P.F. Wubbena, R.M. Dozier, A.W. Townes & H.J. Wittig. 1975. Hypersensitivity to the imported fire ant: A report of 49 cases. J. Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 56: 84-93.

Rosset, H., L. Keller & M. Chapuisat. 2005. Experimental manipulation of colony genetic diversity had no effect on short-term task efficiency in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58: 87–98.

Say, T. 1836. Descriptions of new species of North American Hymenoptera, and observations on some already described. Boston Journal of Natural History. 1: 209-416.

Smith, M.A., D.M. Wood, D.H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs & P.D.N. Herbert. 2007. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 4967–4972.

Thompson, C.R. 1982. A new Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum) species from Florida (Hym.: Formicidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 55: 485-488.

Thompson, C.R. 1989. The Thief ants Solenopsis molesta group of Florida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla. Entomol. 72: 268-283.

Wheeler, W.M. 1908. The ants of Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. (Part 1.). Bull. Am. Museum of Natural History. 24: 399-485.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i3.537

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JCR Impact Factor 2018: 0.604