Analysis of Ant Communities Comparing Two Methods for Sampling Ants in an Urban Park in the City of São Paulo, Brazil

Ana Eugenia de Carvalho Campos


This study aimed to analyze the species composition and functional groups of the ant community and to assess the efficiency of two sampling methods, pitfall and leaf litter sampling, in an urban park. A total of 1,401 ants were collected, which belonged to six subfamilies and 36 species. The predominant species was Wasmannia auropunctata (present in 45.36% of the samples), while the functional group of opportunistic ants were the most frequent (present in 83.75% of the samples) and abundant (95.29% of the total collected specimens) functional group. The Jaccard Similarity Index showed a low similarity between the two sampling methods, as the difference of the number of individuals for each species between these two methods was not significant in only one case (Linepithema sp. 1, p = 0.4561). The fungusgrowing and cryptic ants were more collected in leaf litter samples (p<0.0001; p = 0.0348 respectively). Although there was no significant difference (p = 0.6397) between the two sampling methods for the total individuals of opportunistic ants, more species of this group were collected in pitfall traps. This difference was not significant because of the high presence of W. auropunctata, an opportunistic ant, in samples of leaf litter. Due to the predominance of tramp ants in the studied area, this article illustrates the importance of green urban areas in ant control strategies, since these sites could be used as a source of new colonization for these ants. Furthermore, the combination of the two sampling methods seems to be complementary for obtaining a more complete picture of the ant community.


ant community; urban areas; tramp ants; functional group; urban areas; pitfall trap; leaf litter sample

Full Text:



Agosti, D. & L.E. Alonso 2000. The ALL protocol. In: Agosti D, Majer J, Alonso LE, Schultz TR, editors. Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Biological diversity handbook series. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 204-6.

Alder, P. & J. Silverman 2005. A comparison of monitoring methods used to detect changes in argentine ant (hymenoptera: formicidae) populations. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 21(3): 142-149

Andersen, A.N. 1995. A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. J. Biogeogr. 22: 15–29.

Andersen, A.N 1997. Insight using ants as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Conservation Ecology 1(1): 8-17.

Bueno, O.C. 1995 Formigas nos hospitais. Ciência Hoje, 19(111):12-13.

Bueno, O.C. & A.E.C. Campos-Farinha 1999. As formigas domésticas. In: Mariconi FAM, editor. Insetos e outros invasores de residências. Piracicaba: FEALQ, p. 135-180.

Campos-Farinha, A.E.C., O.C. Bueno, M.C.G. Campos & L.M. Kato 2002. As formigas urbanas no Brasil : Retrospecto. Biológico 64(2): 129-133.

Chao, A. 2004. Species richness estimation. In: N. Balakrishnan, C. B. Read e B. Vidakovic editors. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. New York: Wiley, p. 7907-7916.

Clarke, K.M., B.L. Fisher & G. LeBuhn 2008. The influence of urban park characteristics on ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) communities. Urban Ecosystems, 11(3): 317-334.

Colwell, R.K. 2004. Estimates: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared from samples. Version 7.5.

Delabie, J.H.C, I.C. Nascimento, P. Pacheco & A.B. Casimiro 1995. Community structure of house-infesting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Southern Bahia, Brazil. Fla Entomol, 78(2): 264-270.

Delabie, J.H.C, D. Agosti & I.C. Nascimento 2000. Litter and communities of the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest region. p. 1–17. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LT, Schultz T, editors. Sampling Ground-dwelling Ants: Case Studies from the World’s Rain Forests. Curtin University, School of Environmental Biology (Bulletin, 18), p. 1-18.

Fisher, B.L., A.K.F. Malsh, R. Gadagkar, J.H.C. Delabie, H.L. Vasconcelos & J. D. Majer 2000. Applying the All Protocol. In: Agosti D, Majer J, Alonso LE, Schultz TR, editors. Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Biological diversity handbook series. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 207-214.

Fowler H.G., M.N. Schlindwein & M.A. Medeiros 1994. Exotic ant and community simplification in Brazil: a review of the impact of axotic ants on native ant assemblages. In: Willians DF, editor. Exotic ants, biology, impact and control of introduced species. Westwiew Press. p.151-162.

Hölldobler, B & E.O. Wilson. 1990. The Ants. Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Havard Univer. 732 pp.

Holway, D.A., L. Lach, A.V. Suarez, N.D. Tsuitsui & T.J. Case 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasion. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 181-233.

Iop, S., J.A. Lutinski, F. Roberto & M. Garcia 2009. Formigas urbanas da cidade de Xanxerê, Santa Catarina, Biotemas, 22(2): 55-64.

Leponce, M., L. Theunis, J.H.C. Delabie & Y. Roisin 2004. Scale dependence of diversity measures in a leaf-litter ant assemblages. Ecography 27: 253-267.

Lobry de Bruyn, L.A 1999. Ants as bionidicators of soil function in rural environments. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 74: 425-441.

Longino, J.T., J. Coddington & R.K. Colwell 2002. The ant fauna of tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83: 689-702.

Lopes, C.T., H.L. Vasconcelos 2008. Evaluation of Three Methods for Sampling Ground- Dwelling Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Neotropical Entomology, 37(4): 399-405.

Magurran, AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford, Blackwell Science, p. 77-78.

Moutinho, P.R.S. 1998. Impactos da formação de pastagens sobre a fauna de formigas: conseqüências para a recuperação florestal na Amazônia oriental. In: Gascon C, Moutinha P, editors. Floresta Amazônica: dinâmica, regeneração e manejo. Manaus: Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia/Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Amazônica, p. 155-170.

Orivel, J., J. Grangier, J. Foucaud, J. Breton, A. François-Xavier, H. Jourdan, J.H.C. Delabie, D. Fournier, P. Pecerdan, B. Facon, A. Estoup & A. Jean 2009. Ecologically heterogeneous populations of the invasive ant Wasmannia auropunctata within its native and introduced ranges. Ecological Entomology 34: 504–512

Passera, L. 1994. Characteristics of tramp ants species. In: Williams DF, editor. Exotic ants; biology, impact, and control of introduced species. Boulder: CO., Westview Press. p 23-43.

Philpott, S. M., I. Perfecto, I. Armbrecht & C. L. Parr 2010. Ant diversity and function in disturbed and changing habitats. In: Lach, L., C. L. Parr & K. L. Abbott, editors. Ant Ecology. Oxford University Press, p. 137-156.

Piva A. & A.E.C. Campos-Farinha 1999. Estrutura de comunidade das formigas urbanas do bairro de Vila Mariana na cidade de São Paulo. Naturalia 24: 115-117.

Piva, A. & A.E.C. Campos 2012. Ant community structure (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in two neighborhoods with different urban profiles in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, in press.

Robinson, W.H. 2005. Urban Insects and Arachnids: Handbook of Urban Entomology. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, UK. 500 pp.

Rodrigues, J.J.S., K. S. Brown Jr & A. Ruszczyk. 1993. Resources and conservation of neotropical butterflies in urban forest fragments. Biological Conservation 64: 3-9.

Silva, E.J.E. & A.E. Loeck 1999. Ocorrência de formigas domiciliares (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em Pelotas, RS. Rev.. Bras. de Agrociência 5 (3): 220-224.

Silva, R.R. & C.R.F. Brandão 1999. Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) como indicadoras da qualidade ambiental e da biodiversidade de outros invertebrados terrestres. Biotemas 12(2): 55-73.

Silvestre, R & R.R. Silva 2001. Guildas de formigas da Estação Ecológica Jataí, Luiz Antônio – SP – sugestões para aplicação do modelo de guildas como bio-indicadores ambientais. Biotemas 14(1): 37-69.

Vega, S.J. & M.K. Rust 2001. The Argentine ant – A significant invasive species in agricultural, urban and natural environments. Sociobiology 37 (1): 3-25.

Vital, M.R. 2007. Diversidade de formigas (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) em praças urbanas de Juiz de Fora, MG [thesis]. Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia Aplicada a Conservação e Manejo de Recursos Naturais - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. 71pp.

Wetterer, J.K. & S.D. Porter 2003. The little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata: Distribution, impact, and control. Sociobiology 42 (1): 1-41.

Yamaguchi, T. 2004. Influence of urbanization on ant distribution in parks of Tokyo and Chiba City, Japan I. Analysis of ant species richness. Ecological Research, 19(2): 209-216.

Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. 3 ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River. 944pp.

Zarzuela, M.F.M., M.C.C. Ribeiro & A.E.C. Campos-Farinha 2002. Distribuição de formigas urbanas em um hospital da região sudeste do Brasil. Arq. Inst. Biol. 69(1): 85-87.

Zarzuela, M.F.M., A.E.C. Campos-Farinha & M.P. Peçanha 2005 Evaluation of urban ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as carriers of pathogens in residential and industrial environments: I. Bacteria. Sociobiology 45(1): 9-14.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

JCR Impact Factor 2018: 0.504