Intercolony Avoidance Optimizes Foraging in Eciton burchellii Army Ants

Authors

  • Tom W. Kunhart Department of Biology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY, USA
  • Susan K. Willson Department of Biology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7925-8757

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v71i2.10104

Keywords:

optimal foraging, colony distribution, Hymenoptera, social insects

Abstract

Foraging individuals optimize spatial movement to maximize resource use in heterogeneous environments. Colonies of Eciton burchellii, a neotropical species of army ant, forage as an army, consuming broad arrays of arthropod and social insect prey. Prey depletion in foraging paths exacerbates resource heterogeneity for E. burchellii and may encourage colonies to avoid contact with recently raided areas. Colonies are known to turn in opposite directions more often than random from previous days’ foraging paths, which increases distances between recently raided areas. However, no evidence of colony avoidance of areas recently foraged by a conspecific colony has been presented. In this study, we analyze data collected in the Peruvian Amazon between 1998 and 2008 to examine colony spatial distribution using nearest-neighbor distance data. We found that colonies optimize movement by choosing foraging angles that deflect away from areas recently raided by conspecific colonies. In addition, we found that the observed nearest neighbor distance between E. burchellii colonies was more significant than expected if colonies were dispersed randomly. This dispersion pattern increases the distance between colonies and contributes to a spatial movement that optimizes foraging and decreases colony interactions at recently raided areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blum, M.S. & Portocarrero, C.A. (1964). Chemical releasers of social behavior. IV. The hindgut as the source of the odor trail pheromone in the neotropical army ant genus Eciton. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 57: 793-794.

Boswell, G.P., Britton, N.F. & Franks, N.R. (1998.) Habitat fragmentation, percolation theory and the conservation of a keystone species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 26: 1921-1925.

Boswell G.P., Franks, N.R. & Britton, N.F. (2000). Habitat fragmentation and swarm raiding army ants. In L. M. Gosling & W. J. Sutherland (Eds.), Behavior and conservation (pp. 141-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, P.J. & Evans, F.C. (1954). Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 35: 445-453.

Franks, N.R. (1982a). A new method for censusing animal populations: The number of Eciton burchellii army ant colonies on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Oecologia, 52: 266-268.

Franks, N.R. & Bossert, W.H. (1983). The influence of swarm raiding army ants on the patchiness and diversity of a tropical leaf litter ant community. In S. L. Sutton, T. C. Whitmore, & A. C. Chadwick (Eds.), Tropical rain forest: Ecology and management (pp. 151-163). Oxford: Blackwell.

Franks, N.R. & Fletcher, C.R. (1983). Spatial patterns in army ant foraging and migration: Eciton burchellii on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12: 261-270.

Harper, L.H. (1989). The persistence of ant-following birds in small Amazonian forest fragments. Acta Amazonica, 19: 249-263.

Holldobler, B. & E.O. Wilson. (2009). The superorganism: The beauty, elegance and strangeness of insect societies. New York: Norton, W.W. and Co., 544 p.

Kaspari, M. & O’Donnell, S. (2003). High rates of army ant raids in the Neotropics and implications for ant colony and community structure. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5: 933-939.

Kaspari, M., Powell, S., Lattke, J. & O’Donnell, S. (2011). Predation and patchiness in the tropical litter: do swarm-raiding army ants skim the cream or drain the bottle? Journal of Animal Ecology, 80: 818-823.

Lock, R.H., Lock, P.F., Morgan, K.L., Lock, E.F. & Lock, D.F. (2021). Statistics: Unlocking the power of data, 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 864 p.

Pérez-Espona, S. (2021). Eciton army ants- umbrella species for conservation in Neotropical forests. Diversity, 13: 136.

Powell, S. & Franks, N. R. (2006). Ecology and the evolution of worker morphological diversity: A comparative analysis with Eciton army ants. Functional Ecology, 20: 1105-1114.

Richards L.A. & Windsor, D.M. (2007). Seasonal variation of arthropod abundance in gaps and the understory of a lowland moist forest in Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 23: 169-176.

Schneirla, T.C. (1971). Army ants: A study in social organization. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co., 349 p.

Schneirla T.C. & Brown, R.Z. (1950). Army-ant life and behavior under dry season conditions, 4: Further investigation of cyclic processes in behavioral and reproductive functions. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 95: 263-353.

Sinclair, D.F. (1985). On tests of spatial randomness using mean nearest neighbor distance. Ecology, 66: 1084-1085.

Rettenmeyer, C.W. (1963a). Behavioral studies of army ants. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 44: 281-465.

Willson, S.K. (2004). Obligate army ant following birds: a study of ecology, spatial movement patterns,and behavior in Amazonian Peru. Ornithological Monographs, 55: 1-67.

Willson, S.K., Sharp, R., Ramler, I.P. & Sen, A. (2011). Spatial movement optimization in Amazonian Eciton burchellii army ants. Insectes Sociaux, 58: 325-334.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-05-24

How to Cite

Kunhart, T. W., & Willson, S. K. (2024). Intercolony Avoidance Optimizes Foraging in Eciton burchellii Army Ants. Sociobiology, 71(2), e10104. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v71i2.10104

Issue

Section

Research Article - Ants