Orchid bee fauna responds to habitat complexity on a savanna area (Cerrado) in Brazil.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.1038Keywords:
orchid bee assemblage, habitat complexity, species compositionAbstract
Habitat structure and complexity may broadly affect the diversity and composition of a variety of fauna in terrestrial systems. Here we investigated responses of orchid bee assemblages to habitat complexity, with the aim of assessing complexity as a useful surrogate for species diversity of this group. We test the following hypotheses: (i) There is a greater species richness and abundance of orchid bee in sites with high habitat complexity than lower habitat complexity; (ii) High habitat complexity sites have a different species composition of orchid bee than lower habitat complexity sites. For the purposes of our study, we defined habitat complexity as the heterogeneity in the arrangement in physical structure of habitat (vegetation), although there are a large range of operational definitions in the literature. As result, orchid bee species richness was higher in high complexity areas while community composition was not affected by habitat complexity, because Euglossa melanotricha and E. leucotricha were the dominant species, occurring in both environments. Habitat complexity, measured as a function of differences in multiple strata in forests, may be of great worth as a surrogate for the diversity of a range of arthropod groups including orchid bees.
Downloads
References
Aguiar, W.M., Melo, G.A.R. & Gaglianone, M.C., (2014). Does forest phisiognomy affect the structure of orchid bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) communities? A study in the Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Sociobiology, 61: 68–77.
Alvarenga, P.E.F., Freitas, R.F. & Augusto, S.C. (2007). Diversidade de Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em áreas de cerrado do Triângulo Mineiro, MG. Bioscience, 23: 30-37.
Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., Gonçalves, J.L.M. & Sparovek, G. (2014). Köepen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22:711–728.
Bezerra, C.P. & Martins, C.F. (2001). Diversidade de Euglossinae (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em dois fragmentos de Mata Atlântica localizados na região urbana de João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 18: 823-825.
Chao, A., Chazdon, R.L., Colwell, R.K. & Shen, T.J. (2006). Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples. Biometrics, 62:361–371.
Chust, G., Pretus, J.L., Ducrot, D., Ventura, D. (2004). Scale dependency of insect assemblages in response to landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 19: 41–57.
Clarke, K.R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18: 117-143.
Coops, N.C. & Catling, P.C. (1997). Predicting the complexity of habitat in forests from airborne videography for wildlife management. International Journal of Remote Sensoring, 18: 2677–82.
Faria, L.R.R. & Silveira, F.A. (2011). The orchid bee fauna (Hymenoptera, Apidae) of a core area of the Cerrado, Brazil: The role of riparian forests as corridors for forest-associated bees. Biota Neotropica, 11: 87–94.
Ferreira, R.P., Martins, C., Dutra, M.C., Mentone, C.B & Antonini, Y. (2013). Old Fragments of Forest Inside an Urban Area Are Able to Keep Orchid Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) Assemblages? The Case of a Brazilian Historical City. Neotropical Entomology 42:466–473.
Justino, D.G & Augusto, S.C. (2012). Avaliação da eficiência de coleta utilizando armadilhas aromáticas e riqueza de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em áreas de Cerrado do Triângulo Mineiro. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências, 12: 227-239.
Joly, C.A., Aidar, M.P.M., Klink, C.A., McGrath, D.G., Moreira, A.G., Moutinho, P., Nepstad, D.C., Oliveira, A.A.; Pott, A.; Rodal, M.J.N. & Sampaio, E.V.S.B. (1999). Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity conservation. Ciência e Cultura, 51:331-348.
Kraft, N.J.B, Comita, L.S., Chase, J.M, Sanders, N.J, Swenson, N.G, Crist, T.O, Stegen, J.C., Vellend, M., Boyle, B., Anderson, M.J., Cornell, H.V., Davies, K.F., Freestone, A.L., Inouye,
Krebs, C. J. (1989). Ecological Methodology. Harper & Row, New York.
Lassau, S.A. & Hochuli, D.F. (2004). Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography, 27: 157–64.
Lassau S. A., Hochuli D. F., Cassis G., Reid C. (2005a) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle. Diversity and Distributions, 11: 73–82.
Lassau, S.A. & Hochuli, D.F., (2005b). Wasp community responses to habitat complexity in Sydney sandstone forests. Austral Ecology, 30: 179–187.
Lassau, S.A. & Hochuli, D.F., (2007). Associations between wasp communities and forest structure : Do strong local patterns hold across landscapes ? Austral Ecology, 32: 656–662.
Lessard, J.P., Borregaard, M.K., Fordyce, J.A., Rahbek, C., Weiser, M.D., Dunn, R.R. & Sanders, N.J. (2012). Strong influence of regional species pools on continent-wide structuring of local communities. Proceeding of the Royal Society of Botany, 266: 1–9.
Melbourne, B.A. (1999). Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: an experimental evaluation. Australian Journal of Ecology, 24: 228–39.
Menezes, N.Z. & Giulietti, A.M. (2000). Campos rupestres. Pp. 65-73. In: M.P. Mendonça & L.V. Lins (eds.). Lista vermelha das espécies ameaçadas de extinção da flora de Minas Gerais. Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Fundação Biodiversitas & Fundação Zoo-Botânica de Belo Horizonte.
Myster, R.W. (2009). Plant communities of western Amazonia. Botanical Review, 75:271–291
Nekola, J.C. & White, P.S. (1999). The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography, 26:867–878.
Nemésio, A. & Silveira, F.A. (2010). Forest fragments with larger core areas better sustain diverse orchid bee faunas (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossina). Neotrop Entomol 39:555–561
Nemésio, A. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2013). Beta diversity of orchid bees in a tropical biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22:647–1661.
Nemésio, A. & Faria, L.R.R. (2004). First assessment of orchid bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apini: Euglossina) of Parque Estadual do Rio Preto, a cerrado area in southeastern Brazil. Lundiana, 5:113 117.
Neves, E.L. & Viana, B.F. (1999). Comunidade de machos de Euglossinae (Hymenoptera: Apidae) das matas ciliares da margem esquerda do Médio Rio São Francisco, Bahia. Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 28: 201-210.
Peruquetti, R.C., Campos, L.A.O., Coelho, C.D.P., Abrantes, C.V.M. & Lisboa, L.C.O (1999). Abelhas Euglossini (Apidae) de áreas de Mata Atlântica: abundância, riqueza e aspectos biológicos. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 16: 01-118.
Rebêlo, J.M.M. & Garófalo, C.A. (1997). Comunidades de machos de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em matas semidecíduas do nordeste do estado de São Paulo. Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 26:787–799.
Silveira, G.C., Nascimento, A.M., Sofia, S.H. & Augusto, S.C. (2011). Diversity of the euglossine bee community (Hy- (Hy- menoptera, Apidae) of an Atlantic Forest remnant in southeast- ern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 55: 109-115.
Sofia, S.H. & Suzuki, K.A. (2004). Comunidade de machos de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em fragmentos florestais no sul do Brasil. Neotropical Entomology, 33: 693-702.
Storti, E.F., Oliveira, M.L., Storti Filho, A. (2013). O papel dos fragmentos florestais da cidade de Manaus na manutenção da fauna de abelhas das orquídeas (Apidae: Euglossini). In: Bermúdez, E.G.C., Teles, B.R., Keppler, R.L.M. (orgs.). Entomologia na Amazônia Brasileira, 2: 227-234.
Sydney, N.V., Gonçalves, R.B. & Faria, L.R.R. (2010). Padrões espaciais na distribuição de abelhas Euglossina¸ (Hymenoptera, Apidae) da região Neotropical. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 50:667–679
Tonhasca Jr., A., Blackmer, J.L. & Albuquerque, G.S. (2002). Abundance and diversity of euglossine bees in the fragmented landscape of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica, 34: 416-422.
Tuomisto, H. (2010a). A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone away. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography, 33:2-22
Tuomisto, H. (2010b). A diversity of b diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography, 33: 23–45.
Tuomisto, H. & Ruokolainen, K. (2006). Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology, 87:2697–2708.
Vasconcelos, H.L.; Vilhena, J.M.S., Facure, K.G. & Albernaz A.L.K.M. (2010). Patterns of ant species diversity and turnover across 2000 km of Amazonian floodplain forest Journal of Biogeography, 37: 432–440.
Viotti, M.A., Moura, F.R. & Lourenço, A.P. (2013). Species diversity and temporal variation of the orchid-bee fauna (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a conservation gradient of a rocky field area in the Espinhaço Range, state of Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 42: 565–575.
Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K.J & Field, R. (2001). Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28:453–470.
Wikelski, M., Moxley, J., Eaton-Mordas, A., Lopez-Uribe, M.M, Holland, R., Moskowitz, D.,
Roubik, D.W. & Kays, R. (2010). Large-Range Movements of Neotropical Orchid Bees Observed via Radio Telemetry. Plos One. dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010738
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).