Induced biotic response in Amazonian ant-plants: the role of leaf damage intensity and plant-derived food rewards on ant recruitment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i3.1050Keywords:
myrmecophytes, herbivory, protective mutualism, Ant–plant interactionAbstract
Although plant-ants respond to cues indicating the presence of herbivores, it remains unclear how ant workers are stimulated by herbivory cues with varying intensity. I hypothesized that ants respond more quickly to intense foliar damage, and ants inhabiting myrmecophytes that provide food resource recruit workers to any intensity of foliar damage. I tested the induced response in three ant-plant systems: two that provide food resources and another one that does not provide. I simulated leaf damage using different concentrations of foliar extracts. In all systems the plant-ant recruitment increased after damage simulations. In food providing system ants did not distinguish between different intensity damages, although one system have shown a mixed response to that intensity. This result indicates that ants defend more intensely their host plant to avoid damages that diminish food provisioning. In the non-food providing system ants responded more quickly to simulation of high foliar damage. This faster recruitment to leaves with high damage suggests that ants are searching for hot spots that potentially have more insects for feeding on. I suggested that future works could manipulate plant size and quality, and food provisioning to better understand why mutual ant-plant systems with very distinct characteristics are evolutionarily stabilized.Downloads
References
Agrawal, A.A. (1998). Leaf damage and associated cues induce aggressive ant recruitment in a Neotropical ant-plant. Ecology, 79: 2100-2112.
Agrawal, A.A. & Rutter, M.T. (1998). Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos, 83: 227-236.
Bronstein, J.L. (1998). The contribution of ant-plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica, 30: 150-161.
Bronstein, J.L., Alarcón, R. & Geber, M. (2006). The evolution of plant-insect mutualism. New Phytologist, 172: 412-428. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x
Bruna, E.M., Lapola, D.M. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2004). Interespecific variation in the defensive responses of obligate plant-ants: experimental tests and consequences for herbivory. Oecologia, 138: 558-565. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1455-5
Christianini, A.V. & Machado, G. (2004). Induced biotic responses to herbivory and associated cues in the Amazonian ant-plant Maieta poeppigii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 112: 81-88. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00188.x
Fonseca, C.R. & Ganade, G. (1996). Asymmetries, compartments and null interactions in an Amazonian ant-plant community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65: 339-347.
Fonseca, C.R. (1999). Amazonian ant-plant interactions and the nesting space limitation hypothesis. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 15:807–825.
Heil, M. & Mckey, D. (2003). Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 425-453. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132410
Heil, M., Fiala, B., Linsenmair, K.E., Zotz, G. & Menke, P. (1997). Food body production in Macaranga triloba (Euphorbiaceae): a plant investment in anti-herbivore defense via symbiotic ant partners. Journal of Ecology, 85: 847-861.
Itino, T., Otioka, T., Hatada, A. & Hamid, A.A. (2001). Effects of food rewards offered by ant-plant Macaranga on the colony size of ants. Ecological Research, 16: 775-786. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00433.x
Izzo, T.J. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2002). Cheating the cheater: domatia loss minimizes the effects of ant castration in an Amazonian ant-plant. Oecologia, 133: 200-205. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1027-0
Izzo, T.J. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2005). Ants and plant size shape the structure of the arthropod community of Hirtella myrmecophila, an Amazonian ant-plant. Ecological Entomology, 30: 650-656. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00736.x
Lapola, D.M., Bruna, E.M. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2003). Contrasting responses to induction cues by ants inhabiting Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae). Biotropica, 35: 295-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00288.x
Lovejoy, T.E. & Bierregaard, R.O. (1990). Central Amazonian forests and the minimum critical size of ecosystem project. In Gentry AH (ed.), Four Neotropical rainforests (pp 60-70). Yale University Press, New York.
Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rico-Gray, V. & Oliveira, P.S. (2007). The ecology and evolution on ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
Risch, S.J. & Rickson, F.R. (1981). Mutualism in which ants must be present before plants produce food bodies. Nature, 291: 149-150.
Romero, G.Q. & Izzo, T.J. (2004). Leaf damage induces ant recruitment in the Amazonian ant-plant Hirtella myrmecophila. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20: 675-682. doi: 10.1017/S0266467404001749
Trager, M.T. & Bruna, E.M. (2006). Effects of plant age, experimental nutrition and ant occupancy on herbivory in a neotropical myrmecophyte. Journal of Ecology, 94: 1156-1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01165.x
Vasconcelos, H.L. (1991). Mutualism between Maieta guianensis Aubl., a myrmecophytic melastome, and one of its ant inhabitants: ant protection against herbivores. Oecologia, 87: 295-298.
Vasconcelos, H.L. (1993). Ant colonization of Maieta guianensis seedlings, an Amazon ant-plant. Oecologia, 95: 439-443.
Vasconcelos, H.L. & Davidson, D.W. (2000). Relationship between plant size and ant associates in two Amazonian ant-plants. Biotropica, 32: 100-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00452.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
