Trophic Guild Structure of a Canopy Ants Community in a Mexican Tropical Deciduous Forest

Authors

  • Gabriela Castaño-Meneses Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.35-42

Keywords:

diversity, Chamela, fogging, species richness

Abstract

Ants constitute a very important element in the canopies of tropical forest. The species richness, composition and diversity of ant canopy community in a tropical deciduous forest in the Pacific Cost of Mexico was studied. The sampling was performed by fogging method in a watershed of the Chamela Biological Station, Jalisco State, Mexico. Ants represented 0.5% of all invertebrates in the tree canopy of Chamela, and a total of 46 ant morphospecies from 17 genera were collected. Camponotus and Cephalotes contributed with 13 and 6 species respectively, and the most abundant ants were species of Crematogaster, Tapinoma, Cephalotes and Camponotus. Ant composition was broadly similar at the two sites, and on different canopy species, although significant differences in abundance were apparent for some individual ant species. The dominant guild in the canopy was the omnivourous in all study, but differences in guild trophic composition were recorded in each fogging. The ant community in the canopy of Chamela has shown low spatial variation, but the composition of ant species and trophic guilds have important seasonal variations, demonstrated variations in the exploitation of resources along the year, and vertical migrations of ant species from soil and shrub layer to canopy in the tropical deciduous forest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gabriela Castaño-Meneses, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

UMDI, Titular Professor

References

Andersen, A.N. & Yen, A.Y. (1992). Canopy ant communities in the semi-arid mallee region of Northwestern Victoria. Australian Journal of Zoology, 40: 205-214. doi:10.1071/ZO9920205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9920205

Armbrecht, I., Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. (2004). Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources. Science 304: 284-286. doi: 10.1126/science.1094981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094981

Balvanera, P., Lott, E., Segura, G., Siebe, C. & Islas, A. (2002). Patters of β-diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 13:145–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02034.x

Basset, Y., Aberlenc, H.P. & Delvare, B. (1992). Abundance and stratification of foliage arthropods in lowland rainforest of Cameroon. Ecological Entomology, 17: 310-318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1992.tb01063.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1992.tb01063.x

Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S.E., Kitching, R.L. (2003). Arthropods of Tropical Forest. Spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 474 p.

Bolton, B. (1999). Ant genera of the tribe Dacetonini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Natural History, 33: 1639-1689. doi: 10.1080/002229399299798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002229399299798

Bos, M.M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. (2007). The contribution of cacao agroforest to the conservation of lower canopy ant and beetle diversity in Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16: 2429-2444. doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9196-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9196-0

Brown, W.L. (1959). A revision of the dacetine ant genus Neostruma. Breviora, 107: 1-13. http://hdl.handle.net/10199/1881

Bullock, S.H. (1986). Climate of Chamela, Jalisco and trends in the South coastal region of Mexico. Archives for Meteorology, Geophysics and Bioclimatology, Series B, 36: 297-316. doi: 10.1007/BF02263135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02263135

Bullock, S.H. (1988). Rasgos del ambiente físico y biológico de Chamela, Jalisco, México. Folia Entomológica Mexicana.,77: 5-17.

Bullock, S.H. (2002). La fonología de plantas en Chamela. In Noguera, F.A., Vega-Rivera, J.G. García-Aldrete, A.N. & Quesada-Avendaño, M. (Eds.), Historia Natural de Chamela (pp. 491-498). México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM.

Bullock, S.H. & Solís-Magallanes, J.A. (1990). Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica, 22: 22-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388716

Byk, J. & Del-Claro, K. (2010). Nectar and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities. Acta Ethologica, 13: 33-38. doi: 10.1007/s10211-010-0071-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0071-8

Byk, J. & Del-Claro, K. (2011). Ant-plant interaction in the Neotropical savanna: direct beneficial effects of extrafloral nectar on ant colony fitness. Population Ecology, 53: 327-332. doi: 10.1007/s10144-010-0240-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-010-0240-7

Castaño-Meneses, G. (2008). Estructura de la comunidad edáfica de hormigas en la selva baja caducifolia de Chamela, Jalisco, México. In Estrada-Vanegas, E.G. (Ed.), Fauna de Suelo I. Micro, meso y macrofauna (pp. 133-140). Texcoco: Colegio de Postgraduados.

Castaño-Meneses, G., Benrey, B. & Palacios-Vargas, J.G. (2009). Diversity and temporal variation of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Malaise traps in a tropical deciduous forest. Sociobiology, 54: 633-645.

Cervantes, L., Domínguez, R. & Maass, M. (1988). Relación lluvia-escurrimiento en un sistema pequeño de cuencas de selva baja caducifolia. IIngeniería hidráulica en México II 1: 30-41.

Clarke, K.R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18: 117-143. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x

Clarke, K.R. & Green, R.H. (1988). Statistical design and analysis for a “biological effects” study. Marine Ecology Progres Series, 4: 213-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps046213

Cook, S.C., Eubanks, M.D., Gold, R.E. & Behmer, S.T. (2011). Seasonality directs contrasting food collection behavior and nutrient regulation strategies in ants. PLoS One 6: e25407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025407. (accessed date: 23 May, 2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025407

Damon, A. & Pérez-Soriano, A. (2005). Interaction between ants and orchids in the Soconusco region, Chiapas, Mexico. Entomotropica 20: 59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/RAF2005106

Davidson, D.W., Cook, S.C., Snelling, R.R. & Chua, T.H. (2003). Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300: 969-972. doi: 10-1126/science.1082074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082074

Dirzo, R., Young, H.S., Mooney, H.A. & Ceballos, G. (2011). Seasonally dry tropical forest. Ecology and Conservation. Washington: Island Press, 400 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-021-7

Erwin, T.L. (1983). Beetles and other insects of tropical forest canopies at Manaus, Brazil, sampled by insecticidal fogging. In Sutton, W.L., Whitmore, T.C. & Chadwick, A.C. (Eds.), Tropical rain forest: ecology and management (pp. 59-79). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

García-Oliva, F., Camou, A. & Maass, M. (2002). El clima de la región central de la costa del Pacífico mexicano. In Noguera, F.A., Vega-Rivera, J.H., García-Aldrete, A.N. & Quesada-Avendaño, M. (Eds.), Historia Natural de Chamela (pp. 3-10). Distrito Federal: Instituto de Biología, UNAM.

Gove, A.D., Majer, J.D. & Rico-Gray, V. (2005). Methods for conservation outside of formal reserve systems: the case of ants in the seasonally dry tropics of Veracruz, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 126: 328-338. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.008

Guilbert, E. & Casevitz-Weulersse, J. (1997). Caractérisation de la myrmécofaune de la canopée de forêts primaires de Nouvelle-Calédonie échantillonnée par fogging. In Najt, J. & Matile, L. (Eds.), Zoologia Neocaledonica, Vol. 5. (pp. 357-368). París: Mémoires du Muséum National d’Historie Naturelle.

Guilbert, E., Baylac, M. & Najt, J. (1995). Canopy arthropod diversity in New Caledonian primary forest sampled by fogging. Pan-Pacific Entomology, 71: 3-12.

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. & Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontología Electrónica, 4: 9.[7-11-2013]. Available at http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.

Jaffe, K., Horchler, P., Verhaagh, M., Gómez, C., Sievert, R., Jaffe, R. & Morawez, W. (2007). Comparing the ant fauna in a tropical and a temperate forest canopy. Ecotropicos, 20: 74-81.

Jantarit, S., Wattanasit, S. & Sotthibandhu, S. (2009). Canopy ants on the briefly deciduous tree (Elateriospermum tapos Blume) in a tropical rainforest, southern Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 31: 21-28.

Lach, L., Parr, C.L. & Abbott, K.L. (2010). Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 402 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544639.001.0001

Lévieux, J. (1977). La nutrition des fourmis tropicales: V. Éléments de synthèse. Les modes d’exploitation de la biocoenose. Insectes Sociaux, 24: 235-260. doi: 10.1007/BF02232743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232743

Longino, J.T. & Nadkarni, N.M. (1990). A comparison of ground and canopy leaf litter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a neotropical montane forest. Psyche, 97: 81-94. doi: 10.1155/1990/36505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/1990/36505

Longino, J.T., Coddington, J. & Colwell, R.K. (2002). The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology, 83: 689-702. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0689:TAFOAT]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0689:TAFOAT]2.0.CO;2

Lott, E.J. (1985). Listados florísticos de México. III La Estación de Biología Chamela, Jalisco. México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM, 47 p.

Lott, E.J., Bullock, S.H. & Solís-Magallanes, J.A. (1987). Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests in coastal Jalisco. Biotropica, 19: 228–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388340

Lott, E.J. & Atkinson, T.H. (206). 13. Seasonally dry tropical forests: Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco, as a focal point for comparison. In Pennington, R.T., Lewis, G.P. & Ratter, J.A. (Eds.), Neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests: plant diversity, biogeography and conservation (pp. 315-342). Florida: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420004496-13

Ludwing, J.A. & Reynolds, F.F. (1988). Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley Interscience Publishers, 368 p.

Maass, J.M., Jaramillo, V., Martínez-Yrízar, M., García-Oliva, F., Pérez-Jiménez, A., & Sarukhán, J. 2002. Aspectos funcionales del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en Chamela, Jaslico. In Noguera, F.A., Vega-Rivera, J.H., García-Aldrete, A.N. & Quesada-Avendaño, M. (Eds.), Historia Natural de Chamela (pp. 525-542). México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM.

Maass, J.M., Martínez-Yrízar, A., Patiño, C. & Sarukhán, J. (2002b). Distribution and annual net accumulation of above-ground dead phytomass and its influence on throughfall qua-lity in a Mexican tropical deciduous forest ecosystem. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 18: 821-834. doi: 10.1017/S0266467402002535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467402002535

Majer, J.D. (1990). The abundance and diversity of arboreal ants in Northern Australia. Biotropica, 22: 191-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388412

Martínez-Yrízar, A., Maass, J.M., Pérez-Jiménez, L.A. & Sarukhán, J. (1996). Net primary productivity of a tropical deciduos forest ecosystem in Wester Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 12: 169-175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026646740000938X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740000938X

Meyer, K.M., Schiffers, K., Münkemüller, T., Schädler, M., Calabrese, J.M., Basset, A., Breulmann, M., Duquesne, S., Hidding, B., Huth, A., Schöb, C. & van de Voorde, T.F.J. (2010). Predicting population and community dynamics: the type of aggregation matters. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 563-571. doi: 10.1016/jbaae.2010.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.08.001

Neves, F.S., Braga, R.F., Do Espírito-Santo, M.M., Delabie, J.H.C., Fernandes, G.W. & Sánchez-Azofeifa, G.A. (2010). Diversity of arboreal ants in a Brazilian tropical dry forest: effects of seasonality and successional stage. Sociobiology, 56: 1-18.

Noguera, F.A., Vega-Rivera, J.H., García-Aldrete, A.N. & Quesada-Avendaño, M. (2002). Historia Natural de Chamela. México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM, 568 p.

Ødegaard, F. (2000). How many species of arthropods? Erwin’s estimate revised. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 71: 583-597. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01279.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01279.x

Palacios-Vagas, J.G. & Castaño-Meneses, G. (2003). Seasonality and community composition of springtails in Mexican forest. In Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S.E. & Kitching, R.L. (Eds.), Arthropods of Tropical forest (pp. 159-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palacios-Vargas, J.G. & Gómez-Anaya, J.A. (1993). Los collembolan (Hexapoda: Apterygota) de Chamela, Jalisco, México. Distribución ecológica y claves. Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 89: 1-34.

Palacios-Vargas, J.G., Castaño-Meneses, G. & Gómez-Anaya, J.A. (1998). Collembola from the canopy of a Mexican tropical deciduous forest. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 74: 47-54.

Palacios-Vargas, J.G., Castaño-Meneses, G. & Pescador, A. (1999). Phenology of canopy arthropods of a tropical deciduous forest in wetern Mexico. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 75: 200-211.

Paoletti, M.G., Taylor, R.A.J., Stinner, B.R., Stinner, D.H. & Benzing, D.H. (1991). Diversity of soil fauna in the canopy and forest floor of a Venezuelan cloud forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 7: 373-383. doi: 10.1017/S0266467400005654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400005654

Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x

Rojas, P. (2001). Las hormigas del suelo en México: diversidad, distribución e importancia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Zoologica Mexicana, 1: 189-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2001.8401851

Schonberg, L.A., Longino, J.T., Nadkarni, N.M., Yanoviak, S.P. & Gering, J.C. (2004). Arboreal ant species richness in primary forest, secondary forest, and pasture habitats of a tropical montane landscape. Biotropica, 36: 402-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00333.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00333.x

Schulz, A. & Wagner, T. (2002). Influence of forest type and tree species on canopy ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Budongo Forest, Uganda. Oecologia, 133: 224-232. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1010-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1010-9

StatSoft. (2009). Statistical user guide: complete statistical system StatSoft. Oklahoma.

Stork, N.E. (1987). Guild structure of arthropods from Bornean rain forest trees. Ecological Entomology, 12: 69-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1987.tb00986.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1987.tb00986.x

Stunts, S., Linder, C., Linsenmair, K.E., Simon, U. & Zotz, G. (2003). Do non-myrmocophilic epiphytes influence community structure of arboreal ants? Basic and Applied Ecology, 4: 363-374. doi: 10.1078/1439-1791-00170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00170

Tobin, J.E. (1995). Ecology and diversity of tropical forest canopy ants. In Lowman, M.D. & Nadkarni, N.M. (Eds.), Forest canopies (pp.129-147). San Diego: Academic Press.

Trejo, R.I. & Dirzo, R. (2000). Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest towards its northern distribution: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation, 94: 133-142. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00188-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00188-3

Watanasit, S., Tongjerm, S. & Wiwatwitaya, D. (2005). Composition of canopy ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) at Ton Nga Chang Wildlife Sactuary, Songkhla Province, Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 27: 665-673.

Wetterer, J.K. (2009). Worldwide spread of the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 12: 23-33.

Wilson, E.O. (1959). Some ecological characteristics of ants in New Guinea rain forest. Ecology, 40: 437-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1929761

Wilson, E.O. (1987). The arboreal fauna of Peruvian Amazon Forest: a first assessment. Biotropica 19: 245-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388342

Wilson, E.O. & Taylor, R.W. (1967). Ants of Polynesia. Pacific Insects Mongraphs, 14: 1-109.

Zar, J.H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. Second Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 718 p.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-21

How to Cite

Castaño-Meneses, G. (2014). Trophic Guild Structure of a Canopy Ants Community in a Mexican Tropical Deciduous Forest. Sociobiology, 61(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.35-42

Issue

Vol. 61 No. 1 (2014)

Section

Research Article - Ants

License

Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).