Different Physiognomies and the Structure of Euglossini bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2718Keywords:
Euglossini, physiognomies, Atlantic Forest, beta diversity, conservationAbstract
Our aim was to evaluate the occurrence of orchid bees in remnants of the Atlantic Forest. We sampled specimens from five regions of Southeast Brazil, covering three different physiognomies of the Atlantic Forest (mixed Araucaria forests with high altitude fields, Atlantic Semi-deciduous Forest and Atlantic Rain Forest). The distances between the sampling sites ranged from 24 to 746 km. Male orchid bees attracted by fragrances were actively sampled monthly during one year using entomological nets and aromatic traps. A total of 1,482 bees were captured, including four genera and at least 31 species. We observed differences in the abundance and richness of species sampled among sites. Climatic variables, mostly relative humidity, explained twice more of the observed differences in the Euglossini communities than simple spatial variation. Our study found differences in the composition of euglossine bee communities as well as in their patterns of abundance and dominance among different vegetation formations. However, the level of pairwise similarity among the Euglossini communities sampled, although highly variable, was not related to climatic factors or geographical distances between the sampling sites. The greatest dissimilarities in the composition of the orchid bee communities were observed between sites around 400 km from each other rather than among sites that were further apart. A possible explanation is that the sampled areas that were 400 km from each other were also highly dissimilar regarding climate, especially altitude.
Downloads
References
Abrahamczyk, S., Gottleuber, P., Matauschek, C., & Kessler, M. (2011). Diversity and community composition of euglossine bee assemblages ( Hymenoptera : Apidae ) in western Amazonia, Biodiversity and Conservation, 20: 2981-3001. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0105-1
Aguiar, W. M., & Gaglianone, M. C. (2008). The communities of euglossina bees (Hymenoptera : Apidae) in remnants of lowland forest on tertiary tabuleiro in the Rio de Janeiro state. Neotropical Entomology, 37(2), 118–125. doi:10.1590/S1519-566x2008000200002
Aguiar, W. M., & Gaglianone, M. C. (2012). Euglossine bee communities in small forest fragments of the Atlantic Forest, Rio de Janeiro state, southeastern Brazil (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 56(2), 210–219. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262012005000018
Aguiar, W. M., Melo, G. A. R., & Gaglianone, M. C. (2014). Does forest phisiognomy affect the structure of orchid bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) communities? A study in the Atlantic forest of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Sociobiology, 61(1), 68–77. doi:10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.68-77
Brosi, B. J. (2009). The effects of forest fragmentation on euglossine bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini). Biological Conservation, 142(2), 414–423. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.003
Cordeiro GD, Boff S, Caetano TA, Fernandes PC & Alves-dos-Santos I. (2013). Euglossine bees (Apidae) in Atlantic Forest areas of São Paulo state Southeastern Brazil. Apidologie 44: 254–267. doi:10.1007/s13592-012-0176-3
Costa, C. P., & Francoy, T. M. (2017). The Impact of Different Phytophysiognomies on the Composition of Orchid Bee Communities (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) in the Atlantic Forest in Brazil. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 110(3), 255-262. doi:10.1093/aesa/saw089
Dias, F.V. & Buschini, M.L.T. (2013). Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from an Araucaria Forest fragment in Southern Brazil. Ambiência (Online), 9: 267-277. doi: 10.5777/ambiencia.2013.02.02
Dressler, R. L. (1982a). New specie of Euglossa. III. the bursigera species group ( hymenoptera: Apidae). Rev. Biol. Trop, 30(2), 131–140.
Dressler, R. L. (1982b). Biology of the Orchid Bees (Euglossini). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13(1), 373–394. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002105
Faria Jr., L.R.R. & Melo, G.A.R. (2007). Species of Euglossa (Glossura) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest, with taxonomic notes on Euglossa stellfeldi Moure (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossina). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 51: 275-284. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262007000300004
Faria Jr, L.R.R. & Melo, G.A.R. (2012). Species of Euglossa of the analis group in the Atlantic forest (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Zoologia, 29: 349-374. doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702012000400008
Farias, R.C.A.P., Madeira-da-Silva, M.C., Pereira-Peixoto, M.H. & Martins, C.F. (2007). Horário de atividade de machos de Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) e preferência por fragrâncias artificiais em mata e dunas na Área de Proteção Ambiental da Barra do Rio Mamanguape, Rio Tinto, PB. Neotropical Entomology, 36: 863-867. doi: 10.1590/S1519-
X2007000600006
Farias, R.C.A.P., Madeira-da-Silva, M.C., Pereira-Peixoto, M.H. & Martins, C.F. (2008). Composição e sazonalidade de espécies de Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em mata e duna na Área de Proteção Ambiental da Barra do Rio Mamanguape, Rio Tinto, PB. Neotropical Entomology, 37:
-258. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2008000300003
Giangarelli, D. C., Freiria, G. A., Ferreira, D. G., Aguiar, W. M., Penha, R. E. S., Alves, A. N.,Sofia, S. H. (2015). Orchid bees: a new assessment on the rarity of diploid males in populations of this group of Neotropical pollinators. Apidologie, 46(5), 606–617. doi:10.1007/s13592-015-0350-5
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics sofware package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2008.05.025
Hinojosa-Díaz, I.A., Nemésio, A. & Engel, M.S. (2012). Two new species of Euglossa from South America, with notes on their taxonomic affinities (Hymenoptera, Apidae). ZooKeys, 221: 63-79. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.221.3659
Hutcheson, K. (1970). A test for comparing diversities based on the shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4
Janzen, D. H. (1971). Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science, 171(3967), 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.171.3967.203
Kimsey, L. S. (1979). An Illustrated Key to the Genus Exaerete with Descriptions of Male Genitalia and Biology (Hymenoptera: Euglossini, Apidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. Kansas (Central States) Entomological Society. doi:10.2307/25083988
Kimsey, L. S. (1982). Systematics of bees of the genus Eufriesea (Hymenoptera, Apidae). University of California Press.
Lázaro, A., & Totland, Ø. (2010). Local floral composition and the behaviour of pollinators: Attraction to and foraging within experimental patches. Ecological Entomology, 35(5), 652–661. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01223.x
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurements. Princeton University Press. New Jersey., 177pp. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring of Biological Diversity. Blackwell science. doi:10.2989/16085910409503825
Mattozo, V. C., Faria, L. R. R., & Melo, G. a R. (2011). Orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the coastal forests of Southern Brazil: Diversity, efficiency of sampling methods and comparison with other Atlantic forest surveys. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia Do Museu de Zoologia Da Universidade de São Paulo, 51(33), 505–515. doi:10.1590/S0031-10492011003300001
Medeiros, R.L.S., Aguiar, W.M., Aguiar, C.M.L. & Borges, I.G.M. (2017). The orchid bee communities in different phytophysiognomies in the Atlantic Forest: from lowland to montane rainforests. Sociobiology, 64: 182-190. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i2.1348
Moreira, E.F., Santos, R.L.S., Silveira M.S., Boscolo, D., Neves E.L. & Viana, B.F. (2017). Influence of landscape structure on Euglossini composition in open vegetation environments. Biota Neotropica, 17: e20160294. doi: 10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2016-0294
Morellato, L. P. C., & Haddad, C. F. B. (2000). Introduction : The Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica, 32(4b), 786–792.
Morellato, L. P. C., Talora, D. C., Takahasi, A., Bencke, C. C., Romera, E. C., & Zipparro, V. B. (2000). Phenology of Atlantic rain forest trees: A comparative study. Biotropica, 32(4B), 811–823. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00620.x
Moure JS, Melo GAR & Faria Jr LRR (2008). Euglossini Latreille, 1802. In Moure, J.S., Urban, D., & Melo, G.A.R. (Ed.) Catalogue of Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region. Available online: http://www.moure.cria.org.br/catalogue
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501
Nemésio, A. (2009). Orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Zootaxa, (2041), 1–242.
Nemésio, A. (2011). The orchid-bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of a forest remnant in southern Bahia, Brazil, with new geographic records and an identification key to the known species of the area. Zootaxa, 2821: 47-54.
Nemésio, A., & Engel, M. S. (2012). Three new cryptic species of Euglossa from Brazil (Hymenoptera, apidae). ZooKeys, 222, 47–68. doi:10.3897/zookeys.222.3382
Nemésio, A., & Silveira, F. A. (2007). Orchid bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossina) of Atlantic Forest fragments inside an urban area in southeastern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 36(2), 186–191. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2007000200003
Nemésio, A., & Silveira, F. A. (2010). Forest fragments with larger core areas better sustain diverse orchid bee faunas (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossina). Neotropical Entomology, 39(4), 555–561. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2010000400014
Nemésio, A., & Vasconcelos, H. L. (2013). Beta diversity of orchid bees in a tropical biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(8), 1647–1661. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0500-x
Oliveira-Filho, A. T., & Fontes, M. A. L. (2000). Patterns of Floristic Differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the Influence of Climate1. Biotropica, 32(4b), 793–810. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00619.x
Oliveira, M. O. L. (2006). Três novas espécies de abelhas da Amazônia pertencentes ao gênero Eulaema (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini), 121(361), 121–128.
Pearson, D.L. & Dressler, R.L. (1985). Two-year study of male orchid bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) attraction to chemical baits in lowland south-eastern Peru. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1: 37-54
Peruquetti, R. C., Antonio, L., Campos, D. O., Diniz, C., & Coelho, P. (1999). Abelhas Euglossini ( Apidae ) de áreas de Mata Atlântica : abundância , riqueza e aspectos biológicos, 16, 101–118.
Pielou, E. C. (1969). An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience.
R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: the R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/.
Ramalho, A. V., Gaglianone, M. C., & Oliveira, M. L. De. (2009). Comunidades de abelhas Euglossina ( Hymenoptera , Apidae ) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica no Sudeste do Brasil, 53(2004), 95–101.
Rebêlo JMM & Garófalo CA. (1991). Diversidade e sazonalidade de machos de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) e preferência por iscas-odores em um fragmento de floresta no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 51: 787-799.
Rebêlo, J. M. M., & Garófalo, C. A. (1997). Comunidades de machos de Euglossini: Apidae) em matas semidecíduas do nordeste do estado de São Paulo. Anais Da Sociedade Entomológica Do Brasil, 26(2), 243–255. doi:10.1590/S0301-80591997000200005
Rebêlo, J. M. M., & Moure, J. S. (1995). As espécies de Euglossa Latreille do nordeste de São Paulo (Apidae, Euglossinae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 12(3), 445–466. doi:10.1590/S0101-81751995000300001
Ribeiro, M. C., Metzger, J. P., Martensen, A. C., Ponzoni, F. J., & Hirota, M. M. (2009). The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142(6), 1141–1153. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
Rocha-Filho, L. C., & Garófalo, C. A. (2014). Phenological Patterns and Preferences for Aromatic Compounds by Male Euglossine Bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in Two Coastal Ecosystems of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotropical Entomology, 43(1), 9–20. doi:10.1007/s13744-013-0173-x
Rocha-Filho, L. C. da, & Garofalo, C. A. (2013). Community Ecology of Euglossine Bees in the Coastal Atlantic Forest of São Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of Insect Science, 13(23), 1–19. doi:10.1673/031.013.2301
Roubik, D. W. (2001). Ups and downs in pollinator populations: When is there a decline? Ecology and Society, 5(1). doi:2
Roubik, D. W. (David W., & Hanson, P. E. (2004). Orchid bees from tropical America: Biology and field guide. INBIO Press, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica.
Silva, J.M.C. & Casteleti, C. H. M. (2005). Estado da biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica brasileira. In Mata Atlântica - Biodiversidade, Ameaças e Perspectivas (pp. 43–59).
Singer RB & Sazima M. (2004). Abelhas Euglossini como polinizadores de orquídeas na região de Picinguaba, São Paulo, Brasil. In Barros, F. & G. Kerbany. (Ed.). Orquidologia sul-americana: uma compilação científica. pp. 175-187. São Paulo, Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente e Instituto de Botânica.
Smith, A. R., López Quintero, I. J., Moreno Patiño, J. E., Roubik, D. W., & Wcislo, W. T. (2012). Pollen use by Megalopta sweat bees in relation to resource availability in a tropical forest. Ecological Entomology, 37(4), 309–317. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01367.x
Sofia, S. H., & Suzuki, K. M. (2004). Comunidades de machos de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em fragmentos florestais no sul do Brasil. Neotropical Entomology, 33(6), 693–702. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2004000600006
Sørensen T. (1948). A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter 5: 1-34.
Sydney, N. V., Gonçalves, R. B., & Faria, L. R. R. (2010). Padrões espaciais na distribuição de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera, Apidae) da região Neotropical. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo), 50(43), 667–679. doi:10.1590/s0031-10492010004300001
Tonhasca Jr., A., Blackmer, J. L., & Albuquerque, G. S. (2002). Abundance and diversity of Euglossine bees in the fragmented landscape of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica, 34(3), 416–422. doi:10.1646/0006-3606(2002)034
Uehara-Prado, M., & Garófalo, C. a. (2006). Small-scale elevational variation in the abundance of Eufriesea violacea (Blanchard) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Neotropical Entomology, 35(4), 446–451. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2006000400004
Wittmann, D., Hoffmann, M., & Scholz, E. (1988). Southern Distributional Limits of Euglossine Bees in Brazil linked to Habitats of the Atlantic- and Subtropical Rain Forest (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini). Entomologia Generalis, 14(1), 53–60. doi:10.1127/entom.gen/14/1988/53
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).