Sequencing the Ant fauna of a Small Island: Can Metagenomic Analysis Enable Faster Identification for Routine Ant Surveys?

Authors

  • Jonathan David Majer Adjunct professor University of Western Australia Adjunct Professor of Invertebrate Conservation Department of Environment and Agriculture Curtin University

  • Brian E Heterick Adjunct at Curtin University
  • Nihara R Gunawardene Adjunct at Curtin University
  • Mark Castalanelli Principal at Ecodiagnostics
  • Jason Ledger Principal at Ecodiagnostics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2885

Keywords:

Next Generation Sequencing, Barrow Island, Evaluation, Biosecurity, Ant incursion.

Abstract

All known ant species from a small Western Australian island were subjected to DNA barcoding of the CO1 gene, with a view to using the database to identify ants by Next Generation Sequencing in subsequent, routine surveys. A further aim was to evaluate whether the data could be used to see if any new species had arrived on the island since the total fauna had been inventoried. Of the 125 unique ant species then known from the island, 72 were successfully barcoded. Those that were refractory to amplification were largely the result of sample age and/or contamination. Following this base-line barcoding, ants were sampled from 14 regular sampling sites and ant sequences were obtained from the bulked ‘metagenomic soup’. Prior to doing this, a parataxonomist had identified all ant species in the samples and returned them to the ‘soup’. Successful identification for each site varied from 38% (Sites 12 and 27) to 100% of species (Site 10). Comparison of the number of species recovered with the number of sequences obtained from each sample showed a positive correlation between the two variables. When a site had >1,000 sequences, the average recovery rate was 79%, which is in contrast to the lowest four recovery rates (Site samples 12, 22, 26 and 27), which had fewer than 440 amplicon sequences. The ability to detect individuals that occur at low frequencies is also important. We analysed each site individually to determine if a species was detected and how that related to the proportion of individuals in the pooled sample. Where a species was present at <4% of the total sample, it was only detected 10% of the time, indicating that adequate sequencing depth is critical to species recovery. We conclude that this technique was only partially successful in replacing conventional taxonomy and that it could have limited ability to detect incursions unless the new arrival is abundant. Current barcoding is no longer limited to the CO1 gene and other genes are characterised for identification of intractable groups where CO1 does not provide appropriate levels of resolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jonathan David Majer, Adjunct professor University of Western Australia Adjunct Professor of Invertebrate Conservation Department of Environment and Agriculture Curtin University


School of Plant Biology

References

Beng, K.C., Tomlinson, K.W., Shen, X.H., Surget-Groba, Y., Hughes, A.C., Corlett, R.T. & Silk, J.F. (2016). The Utility of DNA Metabarcoding for Studying the Response of Arthropod Diversity and Composition to Land-use Change in the Tropics. Scientific Reports, 6: 24965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep24965

Biomatters Ltd. Geneious version 8.0.3. Biomatters. Available from http://www.geneious.com/​​

Brandon-Mong, G. J., Gan H. M., Sing, K. W., Lee, P. S., Lim, P. E. & Wilson, J.J. (2015). DNA Metabarcoding of Insects and Allies: an Evaluation of Primers and Pipelines. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 105: 717-27. doi: 10.1017/S0007485315000681

Callan, S. K., Majer, J. D., Edwards, K. & Moro, D. (2011). Documenting the Terrestrial Invertebrate Fauna of Barrow Island, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Entomology, 50: 323-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2011.00818.x

Castalanelli, M. A., Severtson, D. L., Brumley, C. J., Szito, A., Foottit, R. G., Grimm, M., Munyard, K. & Groth, D .M. (2010). A Rapid Non-destructive DNA Extraction Method for Insects and Other arthropods. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 13: 243-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2010.04.003

Castalanelli, M. A., Mikac, K. M., Baker, A. M., Munyard, K., Grimm, M. & Groth, D. M. (2011). Multiple Incursions and Putative Species Revealed Using a Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenetic Approach to the Trogoderma variabile (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) trapping program in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 101: 333-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485310000544

Gibson, J., Shokralla, S., Porter, T. M., King, I., Van Konynenburg, S., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W. & Hajibabael, M. (2014). Simultaneous Assessment of the Macrobiome and Microbiome in a Bulk Sample of Tropical Arthropods through DNA Metasystematics. PNAS 2014 June, 111 (22) 8007-8012. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406468111

Haas, B. J., Gevers, D., Earl, A. M., Feldgarden, M., Ward, D. V., Giannoukos, G., Ciulla, D., Tabbaa, D., Highlander, S. K., Sodergren, E. & Methé, B. (2011). Chimeric 16S rRNA Sequence Formation and Detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR Amplicons. Genome Research, 21: 494-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.112730.110

Heterick, B. E. (2013). A Taxonomic Overview and Key to the Ants of Barrow Island, Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement, 83: 375-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.18195/issn.0313-122x.83.2013.375-404

Ji, Y, Ashton, L., Pedley S. M., Edwards, D. P., Tang, Y., Nakamura, A., Kitching, R., Dolman, P. M., Woodcock, P., Edwards, F. A. & Larsen, T. H. (2013). Reliable, Verifiable and Efficient Monitoring of Biodiversity via Metabarcoding. Ecology Letters, 16:1245-1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12162

Kocher, A., Gantier, J. C., Gaborit, P., Zinger, L., Holota, H., Valiere, S., Dusfour, I., Girod, R., Bañuls, A. L. & Murienne, J. (2017). Vector Soup: High‐Throughput Identification of Neotropical Phlebotomine Sand flies Using Metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17: 172-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12556

Majer, J. D., Callan, S. K., Edwards, K., Gunawardene, N. R. & Taylor, C. K. (2013). Baseline Survey of the Terrestrial Invertebrate Fauna of Barrow Island. Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement, 83:13-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.18195/issn.0313-122x.83.2013.013-112

Pochon, X., Bott, N. J., Smith, K. F. & Wood, S. A. (2013). Evaluating Detection Limits of Next-generation Sequencing for the Surveillance and Monitoring of International Marine Pests. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e73935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073935

Purty, R. S. & Chatterjee, S. (2016). DNA Barcoding: An Effective Technique in Molecular Taxonomy. Austin Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 3: 1059. Available as Open Access on ResearchGate but apparently no DOI

Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., & Flook, P. (1994). Evolution, Weighting, and Phylogenetic Utility of Mitochondrial Gene Sequences and a Compilation of Conserved Polymerase Chain Reaction Primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87: 651-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/87.6.651

Smith, M. A., Fisher, B. L. & Hebert P. D. N. (2005). DNA Barcoding for Effective Biodiversity Assessment of a Hyperdiverse Arthropod Group: the Ants of Madagascar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B Biological Sciences, 360(1462): 1825-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1714

Telfer, A. C., Young, M. R., Quinn, J., Perez, K., Sobel, C. N., Sones, J. E., Levesque-Beaudin, V., Derbyshire, R., Fernandez-Triana, J., Rougerie, R. & Thevanayagam, A., (2015). Biodiversity Inventories in High Gear: DNA Barcoding Facilitates a Rapid Biotic Survey of a Temperate Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Data Journal, 3: e6313 (30 Aug 2015) doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313

Thomas, M. L., Gunawardene, N., Horton, K., Williams, A., O’Connor, S., McKirdy, S. & Van der Merwe, J. (2017). Many Eyes on the Ground: Citizen Science is an Effective Early Detection Tool for Biosecurity. Biological Invasions, 19:1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1481-6

Yang, C., Wang, X., Miller, J. A., De Blécourt, M., Ji, Y, Yang, C, Harrison, R.D. & Douglas, W. Y. (2014). Using Metabarcoding to Ask if Easily Collected Soil and Leaf-litter Samples Can be used as a General Biodiversity Indicator. Ecological Indicators, 46:379-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.028

Yoon, T. H., Kang, H. E., Kang, C. K., Lee, S. H., Ahn, D. H., Park, H. & Kim, H. W. (2016). Development of a Cost-effective Metabarcoding Strategy for Analysis of the Marine Phyto-plankton Community. PeerJ 4, e2115; DOI 10.7717/peerj.2115

Yu, D. W., Ji, Y., Emerson, B.C., Wang, X., Ye, C., Yang, C. & Ding, Z. (2012). Biodiversity Soup: Metabarcoding of Arthropods for Rapid Biodiversity Assessment and Biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3: 613-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x

Downloads

Published

2018-10-02

How to Cite

Majer, J. D., Heterick, B. E., Gunawardene, N. R., Castalanelli, M., & Ledger, J. (2018). Sequencing the Ant fauna of a Small Island: Can Metagenomic Analysis Enable Faster Identification for Routine Ant Surveys?. Sociobiology, 65(3), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2885

Issue

Section

Research Article - Ants