Pollinator Sharing in Specialized Bee Pollination Systems: a Test with the Synchronopatric Lip Flowers of Centrosema Benth (Fabaceae)

Authors

  • Mauro Ramalho Universidade Federal da Bahia Instituto de Biologia
  • Maise Silva Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Salvador, Bahia
  • Gilson Carvalho Universidade Federal da Bahia Instituto de Ciências da Saúde

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.189-197

Keywords:

nectar robber, size threshold, random interaction, bee pollinated flower.

Abstract

Bee-pollinated lip flowers of two synchronopatric species of Centrosema were used as models to examine the influence of specialized pollination systems on the ecological mechanisms of pollinator sharing. Regression analysis of bee abundances in the habitat on bee abundances on C. pubescens flowers was significant (r = 0.69; P = 0.001) and became very consistent and highly significant (r = 0.87; P = 0.00001) using a size threshold of bee pollinators longer than 15mm. These same relationships were not significant (P > 0.01), however, for C. brasilianum flowers. The structures of the two pollination systems also sustained the hypothesis of a size threshold for pollinators, although only the C. pubescens-bees interactions sustained the hypothesis of random interactions proportional to species abundances in the habitat. The flower visitor pools of the two plant species shared the same four main bee guilds: the pollinators Centridini, Xylocopa, and Euglossini and the primary nectar robber Oxaea. However, a significant divergence (P < 0.01) was detected between the two systems when the abundances and behaviors (pollinators or cheaters) of the main shared flower visitors were incorporated into the overall quantitative analysis (NMDS). The flowers size differences are not significant (P > 0.05) and could not explain these divergences. Particularly, the concentrations of the largest pollinators Eulaema and Xylocopa on C. pubescens flowers and the behavior shift of Centridini bees that act as legitimate pollinators in C. pubescens and as nectar robbers in C. brasilianum are better understood as functional foraging responses triggered by the synchronopatry and by nectar volume differences (P = 0.001) between both lip flowers. Paradoxically, the robbery activity of Centridini bees arises as a supply side effect of smaller nectar volume in C. brasilianum flowers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Camargo, J.M.F., Gottsberger, G. & Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. 1984.On the phenology and flower visiting behavior of Oxaeaflavescens (Klug) (Oxaeinae, Andrenidade, Hymenoptera) in São Paulo, Brazil.Betr. Biol. Pflanz. 59, 159-179.

Dafni, A. (1992). Pollination Ecology: The practical Approach series. Ed. IRL Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 250p.

Endress, P.K. (1994). Diversity and evolutionary biology of flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 511p.

Etcheverry, A.V, Protomastro, J.J. & Westerkamp, C. (2003). Delayed autonomous self-pollination in the colonizer Crotalaria micans (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae): structural and functional aspects. Plant Syst. Evol. 239, 15-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0244-7

Faegri, K. & Van Der Pijl, L. (1979). The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-023160-0.50020-7

Galloni, M., Podda, L., Vivarelli & Cristofolini, G. (2007). Pollen presentation, pollen-ovule rations, and other reprodutive traits in Mediterranean Legumes (Fam. Fabaceae – Subfam.Faboideae). Plant Syst. Evol. 266, 147-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0526-1

Genini, J., Morellato, P.C., Guimarães, P.R. & Olesen, J.M. (2010). Cheaters in mutualism networks. Biol.Lett.http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2010/01/18/rsbl.2009.1021.full.html.

González-Gomez, P.L. & Valdivia, C.E. (2005). Direct and indirect effects of nectar robbing on the pollinating behavior of Patagonagigas (Trochilidae). Biotropica 37, 693–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00088.x

Gottsberger, G., Camargo, J.M.F. & Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. (1988). A bee-pollinated tropical community: the beach dune vegetation of Ilha de São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109, 469-500.

Herrera, C.M. (1996). Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil advocate approach. In. Lloyd, D.G. & Barrett, S.C.H.(eds) Floral Biology (pp. 65-87). New York: Chapman and Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_3

Herrera, C.M. (2005). Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon? Amer. J. Bot 92, 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.1.13

Harder L.D. (1985). Morphology as a predictor of flower choice by bumble bees. Ecology 66, 198-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941320

Heinrich, B. (2004). Bumblebee economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Inouye, D.W. (1980). The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61, 1251-1253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936841

Irwin, R.E., Brody, A.K. & Waser, N.M. (2001). The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations and communities. Oecologia 129, 161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100739

Jacobi, C,M., Ramalho, M. & Silva, M. (2005). Pollination biology of the exotic ratlleweed Crotalaria retusa L. (Fabaceae) in NE Brazil. Biotropica 37, 357-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00047.x

Lopes, A.V. De F. & Machado, I.C.S. (1996). Biologia floral de

Swartzia pickelii Killipex Ducke (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) e sua polinização por Eulaema spp. (Apidae-Euglossini). Rev. Brasil. Bot. 19, 17-24.

Michener, C.D. (2000). The bees of the World. London: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. 912p.

Moure, J.S., Urban, D. & Melo, G.A.R. 2007. Catalogue of Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region. Soc. Brasil. Entom. 1058p.

Ollerton J., Killick, A., Lamborn, E., Watts, S. & Whiston, M. (2007). Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to a generalist flower. Taxon 56, 717–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25065855

Ollerton, J., Alarco, R., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., Watts, S., Cranmer, L., Hingston, A., Peter, C. I. & Rotenberry, J. (2009). A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis. Ann. Bot. 103, 1471–1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp031

Por, F.D. (1992). Sooretama. The Atlantic Rain Forest of Brazil. The Nehterlands: SPB Academic Publish.

Pyke, G.H. (1984). Optimal foraging theory: a critical reiew. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 15, 523-75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515

Ramalho, M. & Silva, M. (2002). Flora oleífera e sua guilda de abelhas em uma comunidade de restinga tropical. Sitientibus série Ciências Biológicas2, 34-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/scb8233

Ramalho, M. & Rosa, J.F. (2010). Ecologia da Interação entre as pequenas flores de quilha de Stylosanthes viscosa (Faboideae) e as grandes abelhas Xylocopa cearensis (Apoidea, Hymenoptera), em duna tropical. Biota Neotropica 10, 93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000300010

Rosa, J.F. & Ramalho, M. (2011). Spatial Dynamics of Diversity in Centridini Bees: The Abundance of Oil Producing Flowers as a Measure of Habitat Quality. Apidologie 42, 150-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0075-z

Roubik, D.W. (1989). Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 503p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511574641

Roubik, D.W. & Hanson, P.E. (2004). Orchid bees of tropical America. Costa Rica: Editorial INBio. 370p.

Sakagami, S.F, Laroca, S. & Moure, J.S. (1967). Wild bee Biocoenotics in São José dos Pinhais (PR) South Brazil. Preliminary Report. Jour. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Uni. Ser.VI, Zool. 16, 253-291.

Stang, M., Klinkhamer, P.G.L. & van der Meijden, E. (2006). Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number ofinteractions in a plant–flower visitor web. Oikos 112, 111–121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14199.x

Stang, M., Klinkhamer, P.G.L. & van der Meijden, E. (2007). Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant–flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? Oecologia 151, 442–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0585-y

Tripp, E.A. & Manos, P.S. (2008). Is floral specialization an evolutionary dead-end? Pollination system transitions in Ruella (Acanthaceae). Evolution 62, 1712-1737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00398.x

Urcelay, C., Morales, C. & Chalcoff, V.R. (2006). Relationship between corolla length and floral larceny in the South American hummingbird-pollinated Campsidium valdivianum (Bignoniaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 43, 205-201

Van Der Pijl, L. (1954). Xylocopa and flowers in the tropics. I. The bees as pollinators. Lists of flowers visited. Botany serie C. 57, 413-423.

Vázquez, D.P. (2005). Degree distribution in plant–animal mutualistic networks: forbidden links or random interactions? Oikos 108, 421–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13619.x

Vázquez, D.P. & Aizen, M.A. (2004). Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology 85, 1251–1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/03-3112

Viana, B.F. & Kleinert, A.M.P. (2006).Structure of bee-flower system in the coastal sand dune of Abaeté, northeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 50,53-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262006000100008

Waddington, K.D. (1980). Flight patterns of foraging bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar. Oecologia 44, 199-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572680

Westerkamp, C. (1996). Pollen in bee-flower relations. Bot. Acta109, 325-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1996.tb00580.x

Zhang, Y. W., Zhao, J. M., Yang, C. F. & Gituru, W. R. (2011). Behavioural differences between male and female carpenter bees in nectar robbing and its effect on reproductive success in Glechoma longituba (Lamiaceae). Plant Biology 13 (Suppl. 1), 25–32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00279.x

Downloads

Published

2014-07-13

How to Cite

Ramalho, M., Silva, M., & Carvalho, G. (2014). Pollinator Sharing in Specialized Bee Pollination Systems: a Test with the Synchronopatric Lip Flowers of Centrosema Benth (Fabaceae). Sociobiology, 61(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.189-197

Issue

Section

Research Article - Bees

Most read articles by the same author(s)