Seasonal Changes in Sugar and Amino Acid Preference in Red Wood Ants of The Formica rufa Group
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v67i2.3760Keywords:
ant nutrition, food selection, Formicidae, biocontrol, carbohydrates, proteinAbstract
Red wood ants of the Formica rufa group are important ecosystem engineers throughout the Northern Hemisphere with potential to be commercially produced and used as predatory agents in biological control programs. However, in order to do that, their mutualistic relationship with aphids needs to be disrupted. This may be achieved by developing artificial sugar-based solutions with a composition that makes them more attractive than aphid honeydew. The present field study investigated Formica rufa’s preference for several sugar and amino acid sources, as well as potential seasonal changes in these preferences. Red wood ants consistently preferred sucrose to monosaccharides and were most attracted to solutions containing an amino acid source, albeit seasonal differences were observed with regard to which amino acid sources were most preferred. Recruitment to offered sugar solutions was highest during July, when colony requirements were high, and during October, when alternative food sources were scarce. Since ant preference for sugar solution constituents seems to be species-specific and show seasonal dynamics, artificial food aimed at disrupting ant-aphid mutualisms should be tailored to individual species and seasons.
Downloads
References
Adlung, KG. (1966). A critical evaluation of the European research on use of red wood ants (Formica rufa group) for the protection of forests against harmful insects. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 57:167–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1966.tb03822.x
Arganda, S., Nicolis, SC., Perochain, A., et al. (2014). Collective choice in ants: the role of protein and carbohydrates ratios. Journal of Insect Physiology, 69:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.04.002
Beltrà, A., Soto, A., Tena, A. (2015). How a slow-ovipositing parasitoid can succeed as a biological control agent of the invasive mealybug Phenacoccus peruvianus: implications for future classical and conservation biological control programs. BioControl, 60:473–484. doi: 10.1007/s10526-015-9663-6
Blüthgen, N., Fiedler, K. (2004). Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73:155–166
Blüthgen, N., Gottsberger, G., Fiedler, K. (2004). Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecology, 29:418–429
Boevé, J-L., Wäckers, FL. (2003). Gustatory perception and metabolic utilization of sugars by Myrmica rubra ant workers. Oecologia, 136:508–514. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1249-9
Buckley, R. (1987). Interactions involving plants, Homoptera, and ants. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics, 18:111–135
Cook, SC., Eubanks, MD., Gold, RE., Behmer, ST. (2010). Colony-level macronutrient regulation in ants: mechanisms, hoarding and associated costs. Animal Behaviour, 79:429–437. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.022
Cornelius, ML., Grace, JK., Yates, JR. (1996). Acceptability of different sugars and oils to three tropical ant species (Hymen., Formicidae). Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz, 69:41–43
Detrain, C., Verheggen, F., Diez, L., et al. (2010). Aphid-ant mutualism: How honeydew sugars influence the behaviour of ant scouts. Physiological Entomology, 35:168–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00730.x
Domisch, T., Finér, L., Neuvonen, S., et al. (2009). Foraging activity and dietary spectrum of wood ants (Formica rufa group) and their role in nutrient fluxes in boreal forests. Ecological Entomology, 34:369–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2009.01086.x
Dussutour, A., Simpson, SJ. (2008). Description of a simple synthetic diet for studying nutritional responses in ants. Insectes Sociaux, 55:329–333. doi: 10.1007/s00040-008-1008-3
Fischer, MK., Shingleton, A. (2001). Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Functional Ecology, 15:544–550
Flatt, T., Weisser, WW. (2000). The effects of mutualistic ants on aphid life history traits. Ecology, 81:3522–3529
Frigyik, BA., Kapila, A., Gupta, MR. (2010). Introduction to the dirichlet distribution and related processes. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washignton, UWEETR-2010
Godzińska, EJ. (1986). Ant predation on Colorado beetle ( Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). Journal of Applied Entomology, 102:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1986.tb00888.x
Hölldobler, B., Wilson, EO. (1990). The ants. Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press of Hardvard University Press
Jiggins, C., Majerus, M., Gough, U. (1993). Ant defence of colonies of Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae), against predation by ladybirds. British Journal of Entomology And Natural History, 6:129–137
Jurgensen, MF., Finér, L., Domisch, T., et al. (2008). Organic mound-building ants: Their impact on soil properties in temperate and boreal forests. In: Journal of Applied Entomology. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111), pp 266–275
Kay, A. (2004). The relative availabilities of complementary resources affect the feeding preferences of ant colonies. Behavioral Ecology, 15:63–70. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg106
Lanza, J. (1991). Response of fire ants ( Formicidae : Solenopsis invicta and S . gerninata ) to artificial nectars with amino acids. Ecological Entomology, 16:203–210
Lanza, J., Krauss, BR. (1984). Detection of amino acids in artificial nectars by two tropical ants, Leptothorax and Monomorium. Oecologia, 63:423–425. doi: 10.1007/BF00390676
Madsen, NEL., Sørensen, PB., Offenberg, J. (2017). Sugar and amino acid preference in the black garden ant Lasius niger (L.). Journal of Insect Physiology, 100:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.05.011
Maňák, V., Björklund, N., Lenoir, L., Nordlander, G. (2015). The effect of red wood ant abundance on feeding damage by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 17:57–63. doi: 10.1111/afe.12080
Maňák, V., Nordenhem, H., Björklund, N., et al. (2013). Ants protect conifer seedlings from feeding damage by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 15:98–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2012.00597.x
Nagy, C., Cross, JV., Markó, V. (2013). Sugar feeding of the common black ant, Lasius niger (L.), as a possible indirect method for reducing aphid populations on apple by disturbing ant-aphid mutualism. Biological Control, 65:24–36. doi: 0.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.01.005
Nagy, C., Cross, JV., Markó, V. (2015). Can artificial nectaries outcompete aphids in ant-aphid mutualism? Applying artificial sugar sources for ants to support better biological control of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini in apple orchards. Crop Protection, 77:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.07.015
Nielsen, C., Agrawal, AA., Hajek, AE. (2010). Ants defend aphids against lethal disease. Biology letters, 6:205–8. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0743
Nielsen, JS., Nielsen, MG., Damgaard, CF., Offenberg, J. (2018). Experiences in transplantng wood ants into plantations for integrated pest management. Sociobiology, 65:. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2872
Offenberg, J. (2017). Myrer som nyttedyr i plantagen. Gart. Tid. 16–17
Offenberg, J. (2001). Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49:304–310. doi: 10.1007/s002650000303
Paulson, GS., Akre, RD. (1992). Evaluating the effectiveness of ants as biological control agents of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 85:70–73
Portha, S. (2002). Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs. Behavioral Ecology, 13:776–781. doi: 10.1093/beheco/13.6.776
Schmidt, GH. (1974). Sozialpolymorphismus bei Insekten (Probleme der Kastenbildung im Tierreich). Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart :
Shiraishi, A., Kuwabara, M. (1970). The effects of amino acids on the labellar hair chemosensory cells of the fly. The Journal of General Physiology, 56:768–782
Skinner, GJ., Whittaker, JB. (1981). An experimental investigation of inter-relationships between the wood-ant (Formica rufa) and some tree-canopy herbivores. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 50:313–326. doi: 10.2307/4047
Sorensen, AA., Busch, TM., Vinson, SB. (1985). Control of food influx by temporal subcastes in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17:191–198. doi: 10.1007/BF00300136
Sorensen, PB., Damgaard, CF., Strandberg, B., et al. (2011). A method for under-sampled ecological network data analysis: plant-pollination as case study. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 6:129–139
Stechmann, DH., Völkl, W., Starý, P. (1996). Ant-attendance as a critical factor in the biological control of the banana aphid Pentalonia nigronervosa Coq. (Hom. Aphididae) in Oceania. Journal of Applied Entomology, 120:119–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1996.tb01576.x
Stewart-Jones, A., Pope, TW., Fitzgerald, JD., Poppy, GM. (2008). The effect of ant attendance on the success of rosy apple aphid populations, natural enemy abundance and apple damage in orchards. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10:37–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00353.x
Stockan, JA., Robinson, EJH. (2016). Wood ant ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press
Styrsky, JD., Eubanks, MD. (2007). Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proceedings Biological sciences, 274:151–164. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3701
Sudd, H. (1985). Seasonal changes in the response of wood-ants ( Formica Zugubris ) to sucrose baits. Ecological Entomology, 10:89–97
Tinti, JM., Nofre, C. (2001). Responses of the ant Lasius niger to various compounds perceived as sweet in humans: a structure-activity relationship study. Chemical senses, 26:231–237
Völkl, W., Woodring, J., Fischer, MK., et al. (1999). Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia, 118:483–491
Wäckers, FL., Alberola, JS., Garcia-Marí, F., Pekas, A. (2017). Attract and distract: Manipulation of a food-mediated protective mutualism enhances natural pest control. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 246:168–174. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.037
Warrington, S., Whittaker, JB. (1985). An experimental field study of different levels of insect herbivory induced by Formica rufa predation on sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) I. Lepidoptera Larvae. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 22:775. doi: 10.2307/2403228
Way, MJ. (1963). Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 8:307–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001515
Way, MJ. (1954). Studies on the association of the ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latr.) (Formicidae) with the scale insect Saissetia zanzibarensis Williams (Coccidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 45:113–134. doi: 10.1017/S0007485300026833
Way, MJ., Khoo, KC. (1992). Role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 37:479–503
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
