Do Bottom-up Effects Define The Structuring Of Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Communities In A Restinga Remnant?

Authors

  • Marcos Vinícius Almeida Lopes Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução. Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.
  • Gilberto Marcos de Mendonça Santos Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução. Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v67i2.4938

Keywords:

Conservation, Mirmecofauna, Vegetation complexity

Abstract

Restingas are lowland sandy ecosystems located between mountain ranges and the sea. For living organisms in this ecosystem, restingas can be seen as habitats formed by islands of vegetation separated by a sandy matrix. These organisms are highly influenced by the environmental conditions and physical characteristics of the landscape, including size, connectivity and environmental heterogeneity. Given the recognized effectiveness of ants as bioindicators, this study uses these organisms as a model to assess how vegetation complexity affects ant communities. The study was carried out in the Parque das Dunas, Salvador - Bahia. Within this park, four categories of vegetation islands (Small, Medium, Large and Continuous) were delimited, where the ant fauna was sampled and the forms of vegetal life were analyzed, using the Raunkiaer analysis. A total of 69 ant species were collected from 31 genera and six subfamilies. We found a positive relationship between the diversity of plant life forms (H') and ant richness. In general, there was a significant difference in the composition of ant species in each microhabitat and between the areas of continuous vegetation and the different vegetation islands. There is a bottom up effect mediating the ant community associated with dune vegetation, the local richness of ant species responds to vegetation heterogeneity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achury, R., & Suarez, A.V. (2018). Richness and composition of ground-dwelling ants in tropical rainforest and surrouding landscapes in the Colombian Inter-Andean valley. Neotrop. entomol. 47: 731-741. doi: 10.1007/s13744-017-0565-4.

BDMEP – Banco de Dados Meteorológicos para Ensino e Pesquisa. (2017). Dados Históricos. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep. (acessed date: 12 August, 2017).

Bolton B. (2019). AntWeb: Ants of Bolton World Catalog. https://www.antweb.org/. (acessed date: 29 April, 2019).

Britto, I.C., Queiroz, L.P., Guedes, M.L.S., Oliveira, N.C. & Silva, L.B. (1993). Flora Fanerogâmica das Dunas e Lagoas do Abaeté, Salvador, Bahia. Sitientibus. 11: 31-46.

Cardoso, D.C. & Schoereder, J.H. (2014). Biotic and abiotic factors shaping ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) assemblages in Brazilian coastal sand dunes: The case of doi: 10.1653/024.097.0419.

Corrêa, M.M., Fernandes, W.D. & Leal, I.R. (2006). Diversidade de Formigas Epigéicas (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) em Capões do Pantanal Sul Matogrossense: Relações entre Riqueza de Espécies e Complexidade Estrutural da Área. Neotrop. Entomol. 35: 724–730. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2006000600002.

Fernández, F. (2003). Introducción a las Hormigas de La región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Colômbia.

Gomes, J.P., Iannuzzi, L. & Leal, I.R. (2010). Resposta da comunidade de formigas aos atributos dos fragmentos e da vegetação em uma paisagem da floresta atlântica nordestina. Neotrop. Entomol. 39: 898-905.

Guimarães, M.V.A., Benati, K.R., Peres, M.C.L. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2013). Assémbleia de formigas de serrapilheira em fragmentos florestais no município de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. Biociência 19: 01-09.

Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p.

Kumar, D., & Mishra, A. (2008). Ant community variation in urban and agricultural ecosystems in Vadodara District (Gujarat State), western India. Asian Myrmecol. 2: 85– 93. doi: 10.20362/am.002008.

Lach, L. Parr, C.L. & Abbott, K. L. (2010). Ant Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

Lizée, M.H., Mane, J.F.S., Mauffrey, T.T, & Deschamps-Cottin, M. (2012). Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species–area relationship for urban butterfly communities. J. Landsc. Ecol. 27: 159–169. doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9651-x.

Lutinski, J.A., Lopes, B.C. & Morais, A.B.B. (2013). Diversidade de formigas urbanas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de dez cidades do sul do Brasil. Biota Neotropical. 13: 332-342. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032013000300033.

Mantovani, W. (2003). Delimitação do bioma Mata Atlântica: implicações legais e conservacionistas, pp. 287-295. In: V. Claudino-Sales. Ecossistemas Brasileiros: manejo e conservação, Expressão Gráfica e Editora, Fortaleza.

Magle, S.B., Theobald, D.M & Crooks, K.R.A. (2009). Comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 24: 267–280. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9304-x.

Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B. & Molnár, T. (2001). Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest–grassland transects. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 287–300.

Marques, O.M., Lopes, C.A.L. & Santos, G.M.M. (2009). Análises faunísticas em estudos entomológicos, pp. 119-132. In: F. A. L. Carvalho, A. C. V. L. Dantas, F. A. C. Pereira, A. C. F. Soares, J. F. M. Filho, and G. J. C. Oliveira. Tópicos em Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Brasil.

McArthur, R. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princenton, USA.

McCune, B., & Grace, J.B. (2002). Analysis of Ecological Communities. Glenedeu Beach, Oregon, USA.

McCune, B., & Mefford, M.J. (2011). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6.0, MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, U.S.A.

McKinney, M.L. (2002). Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation. BioScience, v. 52: 883-890.

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403: 853-858.

Nielsen, A.B., Bosch, M., Maruthaveeran, S. & Bosch, C.K. (2013). Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst. doi 10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1.

Öckinger, E., Dannestam, A. & Smith, H.G. (2009). The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landsc. Urban Plan. 93: 31–37. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.021.

Oliveira, P.S., Rico-Gray, V., Diaz-Castelazo, C. & Castillo-Guevara, C. (1999). Interaction between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical costal sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Funct. Ecol. 13: 623-631.

Pacheco, R., Vasconcelos, H.L. (2007). Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81: 193–199. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.004.

Pearson, D.L. (1994). Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 345: 75-79.

Viana, V.M. & Pinheiro, L.A.F.V. (1998). Conservação da biodiversidade em fragmentos florestais. Série técnica IPEFN, 12: 25-42.

Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford, USA.

Resende, J.J., Santos, G.M.M., Nascimento, I.C., Delabie, J.H.C. & Silva, E.M. (2011). Communities of ants (Hymenoptera – Formicidae) in different atlantic rain forest phytophysionomies. Sociobiology. 58: 779-800.

Resende, J.J., Peixoto, P.E.C., Silva, E.N., Delabie, J.H.C. & Santos, G.M.M. (2013). Arboreal ants assemblages respond differently to food source and vegetation physiognomies: a study in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest. Sociobiology. 60: 174-182. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v60i2.174-182.

Rodrigues, J.J.S., Brown, J.R.K.S. & Ruszczyk, A. (1993). Resources and conservation of neotropical butterflies in urban forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 64: 3-9.

Santana-Reis, V.P.G., & Santos, G.M.M. (2001). Influência da estrutura do habitat em comunidade de formigas (Hymenoptera - Formicidae) em Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brasil. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas. 1: 66–70.

Santos, G.M.M., Filho, C.C.B., Resende, J.J., Cruz, J.D. & Marques, O.M. (2007). Diversity and community structure of social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in three ecosystems in Itaparica island, Bahia state, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 36: 180-185.

Silva, E.M., Medina, I.C. Lopes, P.P., Carvalho, K.S. & Santos, G.M.M. (2014). Does ant community richness and composition respond to phytophysiognomical complexity and seasonality in xeric environments? Sociobiology. 61: 155-163. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.155-163.

Vargas, A.B., Mayhé-Nunes, A.J., Queiroz, J.M., Souza, G.O. & Ramos, E.F. (2007). Efeitos de fatores ambientais sobre a mirmecofauna em comunidade de restinga no Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Neotrop. Entomol. 36: 28-37. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2007000100004.

Vasconcelos, H.L., Maravalhas, J.B., Neves, K.C., Pacheco, R., Vieira, J., Camarota, F.C., Izzo, T.J. & Araújo, G.M. (2019). Congruent spatialpatterns of ants and tree diversity in Neotropical savannas. Biodivers. Conserv. doi: 10.1007/s10531-019-01708-9.

Werner, P. (2011). The ecology of urban areas and their functions for species diversity. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 7: 231–240. doi: 10.1007/s11355-011-0153-4.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Lopes, M. V. A., & Santos, G. M. de M. (2020). Do Bottom-up Effects Define The Structuring Of Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Communities In A Restinga Remnant?. Sociobiology, 67(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v67i2.4938

Issue

Vol. 67 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Research Article - Ants

License

Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)