The role of vegetation structure and abiotic factors affecting the temporal dynamics of ant foraging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v69i2.7422Keywords:
Habitat complexity, Semi-arid region, Niche partitioning, Complex networks, CompetitionAbstract
The study of foraging dynamics is essential to understanding the way organisms arrange themselves to reduce the effects of competition in the most diverse natural systems. The analysis of temporal foraging patterns is an important tool for understanding how ant communities respond to different environmental conditions. Thus, to verify how complexity of the vegetation and abiotic factors can influence ground-dwelling ants communities, we evaluated the foraging temporal patterns in three types of landscapes (Grassland, Arboreal Caatinga, Shrub Caatinga) in an área of dry seasonal rainforest. These environments were characterized by abundance of plant life forms. The ants were collected by pitfall trap, arranged in six rows each with five traps. The pitfalls were inspected every hour from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm, and temperature and humidity data were taken at the same time. The foraging structure of ant communities presented a nested pattern between the phytophysiognomies, but with variation in the observed metric values. For less complex environments, foraging activity was restricted to preferential times, demonstrating a temporal niche partition. Despite more complex environments have a greater richness of species foraging throughout the day, we found greater diversity in environment with intermediate complexity. Temperature influences the richness of foraging ants throughout the day, but we found no effect on diversity. Our results indicate that, although temperature may influence the temporal dynamics of ground-dwelling ant communities, changes in the structural complexity of the environment affect the foraging activity among species, influencing ant-mediated ecological processes.
Downloads
References
Abril, S., Oliveras, J. & Gómez, C. (2007). Foraging activity and dietary spectrum of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in invaded natural areas of the northeast Iberian Peninsula. Environmental Entomology, 36: 1166-1173. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[1166:FAADSO]2.0.CO;2
Andersen, A.N. (1991). Responses of ground-foraging ant Communities to three experimental fire regimes in a savanna forest of Tropical Australia. Biotropica, 23: 575-585. doi: 10.2307/2388395
Andersen, A.N. (1997). Using ants as bioindicators: Multiple issues in ant community ecology. Conservation Ecology, 1: 1-17.
Andersen, A.N. (1986). Patterns of ant community organization in mesic southeastern Australia. Austral Ecology, 11: 87-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1986.tb00920.x
Andersen, A.N., Fisher, A., Hoffmann, B.D., Read, J.L. & Richards, R. (2004). Use of terrestrial invertebrates for biodiversity monitoring in Australian rangelands, with particular reference to ants. Austral Ecology, 29: 87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01362.x
Asfiya, W., Yeeles, P., Lach, L., Majer, J.D., Heterick, B. & Didham, R.K. (2016). Abiotic factors affecting the foraging activity and potential displacement of native ants by the invasive African big-headed ant Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius, 1793) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 22: 43-54.
Bastolla, U., Fortuna, M.A, Pascual-García, A., Ferrera, A., Luque, B. & Bascompte, J. (2009). The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature, 458: 1018-1020. doi: 10.1038/nature07950
Bernstein, R.A. (1975). Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density. Ecology, 56: 213-219. doi: 10.2307/1935314
Bernstein, R.A. (1979). Schedules of foraging activity in species of ants. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48: 921-930. doi: 10.2307/4204
Bestelmeyer, B.T. (1997). Stress tolerance in some Chacoan dolichoderine ants: implications for community organization and distribution. Journal of Arid Environments, 35: 297-310. doi: 10.1006/jare.1996.0147
Bestelmeyer, B.T. & Wiens, J.A. (2001). Ant biodiversity in semiarid landscape mosaics: The consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecological Applications, 11: 1123-1140. doi: 10.1890/10510761(2001)011[1123:ABISLM]2.0.CO;2
Bodenheimer, F.S. (1938). Problems of animal ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183 p
Blüthgen, N. & Fiedler, K. (2004). Competition for composition: lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities. Ecological Society of America, 85: 1479-1485. doi: 10.1890/03-0430
Blüthgen, N. & Klein, A.M. (2011). Functional complementarity and specialisation: The role of biodiversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12: 282-291. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.11.001
Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Blüthgen, N. (2006). Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6: 9-12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
Boyle, M.J. W., Bishop, T.R., Luke, S.H., van Breugel, M., Evans, T.A., Pfeifer, M., Fayle, T.M., Hardwick, S R., Lane-Shaw, R.I., Yusah, K.M., Ashford, I.C.R., Ashford, O.S., Garnett, E., Turner, E.C., Wilkinson, C.L., Chung, A.Y.C. & Ewers, R.M. (2021). Localised climate change defines ant communities in human-modified tropical landscapes. Functional Ecology, 35: 1094-1108. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13737
Burgos, E., Ceva, H., Perazzo, R.P.J., Devoto, M., Medan, D., Zimmermann, M. & María Delbue, A. (2007). Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249: 307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.030
Carvalho, D.M., Aguiar, C.M.L. & Santos, G.M.M. (2013). Food niche overlap among neotropical carpenter bees (Hym.: Apidae: Xylocopini) in an agricultural system. Sociobiology, 60: 283-288. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v60i3.283-288
Cerdá, X., Dahbi, A. & Retana, J. (2002). Spatial patterns, temporal variability, and the role of multi-nest colonies in a monogynous Spanish desert ant. Ecological Entomology, 27: 7-15. doi: 10.1046/j.0307-6946.2001.00386.x
Cerdá, X. & Retana, J. (2000). Alternative strategies by thermophilic ants to cope with extreme heat: Individual versus colony level traits. Oikos, 89: 155-163. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890117.x
Cerda, X., Retana, J. & Cros, S. (1997). Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterraneanant communities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66: 363-374. doi: 10.2307/5982
Cerdá, X., Retana, J. & Cros, S. (1998). Critical thermal limits in Mediterranean ant species: trade-off between mortality risk and foraging performance. Functional Ecology, 12: 45-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00160.x
Chen, X., Adams, B., Bergeron, C., Sabo, A. & Hooper-Bùi, L. (2014). Ant community structure and response to disturbances on coastal dunes of Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Insect Conservation, 19: 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10841-014-9722-9
Costa, F.V., Blüthgen, N., Viana-Junior, A.B., Guerra, T.J., Di Spirito, L. & Neves, F.S. (2018). Resilience to fire and climate seasonality drive the temporal dynamics of ant-plant interactions in a fire-prone ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 93: 247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.001
Cros, S., Cerdá, X. & Retana, J. (1997). Spatial and temporal variation in the activity patterns of Mediterranean ant comunities. Ecoscience, 4: 269-278. doi: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624440403
Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014). Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant-plant networks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113: 405-414. doi: 10.1111/bij.12350
Dáttilo, W., Sánchez-Galván, I., Lange, D., Del-Claro, K. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014). Importance of interaction frequency in analysis of ant-plant networks in tropical environments. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 30: 165-168. doi: 10.1017/S0266467413000813
Davidson, D.W. (1977). Species Diversity and Community Organization in Desert Seed-Eating Ants. Ecology, 58: 711-724. doi: 10.2307/1936208
de la Mora, A., Murnen, C.J. & Philpott, S.M. (2013). Local and landscape drivers of biodiversity of four groups of ants in coffee landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22: 871- 888. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0454-z
Dejean, A., Ryder, S., Bolton, B., Compin, A., Leponce, M., Azémar, F., Céréghino, R., Orivel, J. & Corbara, B. (2015). How territoriality and host-tree taxa determine the structure of ant mosaics. Science of Nature, 102. doi: 10.1007/s00114-015-1282-7
Delsinne, T., Roisin, Y. & Leponce, M. (2007). Spatial and temporal foraging overlaps in a Chacoan ground-foraging ant assemblage. Journal of Arid Environments, 71: 29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.02.007
Dormann, C.F., Frueund, J., Bluethgen, N. & Gruber, B. (2009). Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Ecology Journal, 2: 7-24. doi: 10.2174/1874213000902010007
Dunn, R.R., Parker, C.R. & Sanders, N.J. (2007). Temporal patterns of diversity: assessing the biotic and abiotic controls on ant assemblages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 91: 191-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00783.x
Fellers, J.H. (1987). Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology, 68: 1466-1478. doi: 10.2307/1939230
Fowler, H.G., Forti, L.C., Brandão, C.R.F., Delabie, J.H.C. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (1991). Ecologia Nutricional de formigas, In A.R. Panizzi & J.R.P. Parra (Eds.), Ecologia nutricional de insetos e suas implicações no manejo de pragas (pp. 131-223), Editora Manole e CNPq, São Paulo.
Gardner, S.M., Cabido, M.R., Valladares, G.R. & Diaz, S. (1995). The influence of habitat structure on arthropod diversity in Argentine semi-arid Chaco forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6: 349-356. doi: 10.2307/3236234
Gibb, H. & Parr, C.L. (2010). How does habitat complexity affect ant foraging success ? A test using functional measures on three continents. Oecologia, 164: 1061-1073. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1703-4
Gibb, H. & Parr, C.L. (2013). Does structural complexity determine the morphology of assemblages? an experimental test on three continents. PloS One, 8: e64005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064005
Gomes, J.P., Iannuzzi, L. & Leal, I.R. (2010). Resposta da comunidade de formigas aos atributos dos fragmentos e da vegetação em uma paisagem da Floresta Atlântica nordestina. Neotropical Entomology, 39: 898-905. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2010000600008
Gotelli, N.J. & Ellison, A.M. (2013). Ecosim R. Version 1.0. http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html. (accessed date: 28 November, 2021)
Hampton, S.E. (2004). Habitat overlap of enemies: Temporal patterns and the role of spatial complexity. Oecologia, 138: 475-484. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1446-6
Hansen, R.A. (2000). Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecological Society of America, 81: 1120-1132. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1120:EOHCAC]2.0.CO;2
Houadria, M., Salas-Lopez, A., Orivel, J., Blüthgen, N., & Menzel, F. (2015). Dietary and Temporal niche differentiation in tropical ants-can they explain local ant coexistence? Biotropica, 47: 208-217. doi: 10.1111/btp.12184
Jayatilaka, P., Narendra, A., Reid, S.F., Cooper, P. & Zeil, J. (2011). Different effects of temperature on foraging activity schedules in sympatric Myrmecia ants. Journal of Experimental Biology, 214: 2730-2738. doi: 10.1242/jeb.053710
Jordano, P. (1987). Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. The American Naturalist, 129: 657-677. doi: 10.1086/284665
Kronfeld-Schor, N. & Dayan, T. (2003). Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 153-181. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132435
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Laurance, S. G. & Sampaio, E. (2002). Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16: 605-618. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739. 2002.01025.x
Leal, I.R., Da Silva, J.M., Tabarelli, M. & LACHER JR., T. (2005). Mudando o curso da conservação da biodiversidade na Caatinga do Nordeste do Brasil. Megadiversidade, 1: 141-146.
Majer, J.D. (1983). Ants: Bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use, and land conservation. Environmental Management, 7: 375-383. doi: 10.1007/BF01866920
Martins, I.S., Ortega, J.C.G., Guerra, V., Costa, M.M.S., Martello, F. & Schmidt, F.A. (2022). Ant taxonomic and functional beta-diversity respond differently to changes in forest cover and spatial distance. Basic and Applied Ecology, 60: 89-102. doi: 10.1016/J.BAAE.2022.02.008
Meurer, E., Battirola, L.D., Delabie, J.H.C. & Marques, M.I. (2015). Influence of the vegetation mosaic on ant (Formicidae: Hymenoptera) distributions in the northern Brazilian pantanal. Sociobiology, 62: 382-388. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v62i3.359
Neves, F. S., Antoniazzi, R., Camarota, F., Pacelhe, F. T. & Powell, S. (2021). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the ant community in a dry forest differ by vertical strata but not by successional stage. Biotropica, 53: 372-383. doi: 10.1111/btp.12918
Nooten, S.S., Schultheiss, P., Rowe, R.C., Facey, S.L. & Cook, J.M. (2019). Habitat complexity affects functional traits and diversity of ant assemblages in urban green spaces (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 29: 67-77. doi: 10.25849/myrmecol.news_029067
Palmer, T.M., Stanton, M.L. & Young, T.P. (2003). Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. The American Naturalist, 162: S63-S79. doi: 10.1086/378682
Pianka, E.R. (1973). The structure of lizard communities. annual review of ecology and systematics, 4: 53-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413
Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The life forms plants and statistical geography. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 632 p
Resende, J.J., Santos, G.M. de M., Bichara Filho, C.C. & Gimenes, M. (2001). Atividade diária de busca de recursos pela vespa social Polybia occidentalis (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoociências, 3: 105-115.
Retana, J. & Cerdá, X. (2000). Patterns of diversity and composition of Mediterranean ground ant communities tracking spatial and temporal variability in the thermal environment. Oecologia, 123: 436-444. doi: 10.1007/s004420051031
Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x
Richards, S.A. (2002). Temporal partitioning and aggression among foragers: modeling the effects of stochasticity and individual state. Behavioral Ecology, 13: 427-438. doi: 10.1093/ beheco/13.3.427
Sanders, N.J. & Gordon, D.M. (2000). The effects of interspecific interactions on resource use and behavior in a desert ant. Oecologia, 125: 436-443. doi: 10.1007/s004420000463
Santos, G.M. de M., Bichara Filho, C.C., Resende, J.J., Cruz, J.D. da & Marques, O.M. (2007). Diversity and community structure of social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in three ecosystems in itaparica island, Bahia State, Brazil. Neotropical
Entomology, 36: 180-185. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X200700 0200002
Santos, G.M. de M. & Presley, S. (2010). Niche overlop and temporal activity patterns of social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in a brazilian cashew orchard. Sociobiology, 56: 121-131.
Silva, R.R. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2014). Ecosystem-wide morphological structure of leaf-litter ant communities along a tropical latitudinal gradient. PloS One, 9: e93049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093049
Silveira Neto, S. (1976). Manual de ecologia dos insetos. São Paulo: Agronômica Ceres, 419 p
Silvestre, R., Brandão, C.R.F., Rosa, R. & Silva, D. (2003). Grupos funcionales de hormigas: el caso de los gremios del Cerrado. Introducción a Las Hormigas de La Región Neotropical, 19: 302-308. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005647
Sousa-Souto, L., Figueiredo, P.M.G., Ambrogi, B.G., Oliveira, A.C.F., Ribeiro, G.T. & Neves, F.S. (2016). Composition and richness of arboreal ants in fragments of Brazilian Caatinga: Effects of secondary succession. Sociobiology, 63: 762-769. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.909
Stirnemann, I., Mortelliti, A., Gibbons, P. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2015). Fine-scale habitat heterogeneity influences occupancy in terrestrial mammals in a temperate region of Australia. PloS One, 10: 1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138681
Tadu, Z., Djiéto-Lordon, C., Yede, Youbi, E.M., Aléné, C.D., Fomena, A. & Babin, R. (2014). Ant mosaics in cocoa agroforestry systems of Southern Cameroon: influence of shade on the occurrence and spatial distribution of dominant ants. Agroforestry Systems, 88: 1067-1079. doi: 10.1007/s10457-014-9676-7
Traniello, J.F.A. (1989). Foraging strategies of ants. Annual Review of Entomology, 34: 191-210. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001203
Van Oudenhove, L., Billoir, E., Boulay, R., Bernstein, C. & Cerdá, X. (2011). Temperature limits trail following behaviour through pheromone decay in ants. Naturwissenschaften, 98: 1009-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0852-6
Vilani, M.T., Sanches, L., Nogueira, J.D.E.S. & Priante-Filho, N. (2006). Sazonalidade da radiação, temperatura e umidade em uma floresta de transição Amazônia/Cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, 21: 331-343.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Josieia Teixeira Santos, Emanuelle Luiz da Silva Brito, Gilberto Marcos de Mendonça Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
