Determination of Anatolian Honeybee Biodiversity by Wing Characters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v70i3.8333Keywords:
Apis mellifera L., Biodiversity, Morphometry, Conservation, TürkiyeAbstract
In this study, we report that there were five different subspecies and three different ecotypes defined so far in Türkiye, which has a rich biodiversity in terms of honeybee subspecies. However, recently, it has been thought that the current biodiversity is in danger of extinction due to the commercial queen bee supply and the migratory beekeeping activities from a single source. This study uses the morphometric method to reveal the current status of honeybee biodiversity in Türkiye. For this purpose, a total of 3186 worker bees were studied by samplings from 19 different provinces to represent the honeybee races and ecotypes distributed in Türkiye. We made wing preparations and established 19 landmarks on the right forewings using the BAB BsPro200 program. The program automatically obtained the wing’s metrics’ angle, length, and index values via these 19 landmarks. We used Discriminant function analysis to determine intragroup and intergroup variations by taking the colony averages from data obtained from 31 morphological characters. Given the canonical discriminant function analysis and UPGMA dendrogram, Zonguldak, Düzce, Sakarya, Artvin, Ardahan, and Trabzon constituted a group, and Edirne, Kilis, Van, and Isparta formed a separate group. Hakkari, Kahramanmaraş, and Ordu provinces formed a separate line together. On the other hand, the group centers of Kars and Kırklareli, two different ends of Türkiye, overlapped and formed a close line with Isparta. As a result, this study revealed that, although the protection measures taken at the local level effectively protected the honeybee biodiversity, these measures are insufficient.
Downloads
References
Adam, B. (1954). Bee breeding. Bee World, 35: 4-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1954.11094836
Adam, B. (1983). In search of the best strains of bees. Hebden Bridge: Northern Bee Books, 206 p.
Alpatov, W.W. (1929). Biometrical studies on variation and races of the honeybee Apis mellifera. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 4: 1-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/394322
Alpatov, W.W. (1948). The races of honeybees and their use in agriculture. Sredi Prirodi, 4: 1-65.
Awetisjan, G.A. (1978). Selection of Carpathian bees. In G.A. Awetisjan, W.A. Gubin & I.K. Davydenko (Eds.), International beekeeping congress (pp. 366-371). Bucharest: Apiculture, Apimondia Publishing House.
Bilash, G.D., Makarov, H. & Sedich, A.W. (1976). Geographic classification of honeybee races in the USSR. In Apimondia Symposium of Genetics Selection and Reproduction (pp. 140-150).
Bodenheimer, F.S. (1941). Studies on the honeybee and beekeeping in Türkiye. Ankara: Merkez Ziraat Mücadela Enstitüsü Numune Matbaası.
Bodur, C., Kence, M. & Kence, A. (2006). Microsatellıte analysıs revealed the maintenance of genetic ıdentıty of subspecies of Apis mellifera L. In Türkiye in spıte of intensive migratory beekeeping. Second European Conference of Apidology. Prague, Czech Republic: 10-14 September.
Bouga, M., Harizanis, P., Kılıas, G. & Alahıotıs, S. (2005). Genetic divergence and phylogenetic relationships of honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) populations from Greece and Cyprus using PCR-RFLP analysis of three mtDNA segments. Apidologie, 36: 335-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2005021
Brown, W.M. (1985). The mitochondrial genome of animals. In R.J. MacInterre (Eds.), Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (pp. 95-130). New York: Plenum Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4988-4_2
Buttel-Reepen, H. (1906). Apistica. Beitrage zur Systematic, Biologie, sowie zur geschichtlichen und Geographischen Verbreitung der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L), ihrer Varietaten und der übrigen Apis-Arten (pp. 118-120). Berlin: Veroff. Zoology Museum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.4830030201
Cornuet, J. & Fresnaye, J. (1989). Biometrical study of honey bee populations from Spain and Portugal. Apidologie, 20: 93-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19890109
Daly, H.V. (1985). Insect morphometrics. Annual Review of Entomology, 30: 415-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.30.010185.002215
Daly, H.V., Danka, R.G., Hoelmer, K., Rinderer, T.E. & Buco, S.M. (1995). Honey bee morphometrics: linearity of variables with respect to body size and classification tested with European worker bees reared by varying number of nurse bees. Journal of Apicultural Research, 34: 129-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1995.11100898
Daly, H.V., Hoelmer, K. & Gambino, P. (1991). Clinal geographic variation in feral honey bees in California, USA. Apidologie, 22: 591-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19910603
Darendelioglu, Y. & Kence, A. (1992). Morphometric study on population structure on honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). In Türkiye 2. Entomoloji Kongresi Bildirileri (pp. 387-396). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Yayınları.
DuPraw, E. (1965). Non-Linnear taxonomy and the systematics of honey bees. Systematic Zoology, 14: 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2411899
Goetze, G. (1940). Die beste Biene: Züchtungs- u. Rassen-Kunde d. Honigbiene nach d. heutigen Stand von Wiss. u. Praxis. Leipzig: Liedloff Loth und Michaelis.
Goetze, G. (1964). Die Honigbiene in natürlicher und künstlicher Zuchtauslese. 2 Beurteilung und züchterische Auslese von Bienenvölkern. Hamburg: Hamburg Parey.
Güler, A. & Kaftanoglu, O. (1999a). Türkiye’deki önemli bal arısı ırk ve ekotiplerinin morfolojik özellikleri-I. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23: 565-575.
Güler, A. & Kaftanoglu, O. (1999b). Türkiye’deki önemli bal arısı ırk ve ekotiplerinin morfolojik özellikleri-II. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23 (Suppl. 3): 571-575.
Güler, A. & Kaftanoglu, O. (1999c). Türkiye’deki önemli bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) ırk ve ekotiplerinin morfolojik karakterler açısından iliskilerinin diskriminant analiz yöntemiyle saptanması. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23: 565-575.
Güler, A. (1999). Türkiye’nin bazı bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) genotiplerinde verimi etkileyen mofolojik ve fizyolojik karakterler üzerinde araştırmalar. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23 (Suppl. 2): 393-399.
Güler, A. (2001). Artvin Borçka Camili (Macahel) yöresi bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.)’nın morfolojik özellikleri. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 25: 473-481.
Güler, A., Akyol, E., Gökçe, M. & Kaftanoglu, O. (2002). Artvin ve Ardahan yöresi bal arıları (Apis mellifera L.)’nın bazı morfolojik özellikler yönünden iliskilerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 26: 595-603.
Güler, A., Kaftanoglu, O., Bek, Y. & Yeninar, H. (1999). Türkiye’deki önemli bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) ırk ve ekotiplerinin göçer arıcılık kosullarında performanslarının karsılastırılması, Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23 (Suppl. 3): 565-575.
Kandemir, İ. & Kence, A. (1995). Allozym variability in a central Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) population. Apidologie, 26: 503-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19950607
Kandemir, İ., Kandemir, G., Kence, M., İnci, A. & Kence, A. (1995). Morphometrical and electrophoretical discrimination of honeybees from different regions of Turkey. In XXXIV. International Apicultural congress in Apimondia (pp. 14-19). Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kandemir, İ., Kence, M. & Kence, A. (2000). Genetic and Morphometric variation in honeybee (Apis mellifera) population of Türkiye. Apidologie, 31: 343-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000126
Kandemir, İ., Kence, M. & Kence, A. (2005). Morphometric and electrophoretic variation in different honeybees (Apis mellifera) population. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29: 885-890.
Kandemir, İ., Kence, M., Sheppard, W.S. & Kence, A. (2006a). Mitochondrial DNA variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations from Türkiye. Journal of Apicultural Research and Bee World, 45: 33-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2006.11101310
Kandemir, İ., Pinto, M.A., Meixner, M.D. & Sheppard, W.S. (2006b). Hinf-I digestion of cytochrome oxidase I region is not a diagnostic test for A. m. lamarckii. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 29: 747-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572006000400027
Kandemir, İ., Meixner, M.D., Özkan, A. & Sheppard, W.S. (2006c). Genetic characterization of honey bee (Apis mellifera cypria) populations in northern Cyprus. Apidologie, 37: 547-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006029
Karabağ, K., İvgin Tunca, R., Tüten, E. & Doğaroğlu, T. (2020). Current genetic status of honey bees in Anatolia in terms of thirty polymorphic microsatellite markers. Turkish Entomology Journal, 44: 333-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.678808
Kekeçoğlu, M. (2018). Morphometric divergence of Anatolian honey bees through loss of original traits: A dangerous outcome of Turkish apiculture. Sociobiology, 65: 232-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i2.1895
Kekeçoğlu, M. & Sosysal, M.İ. (2010). Genetic diversity of bee ecotypes in Türkiye and evidence for geographical differences. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 15: 5646-5653.
Maa, T.C. (1953). An inquiry into the systematics of the Tribe Apidini or honeybees (Hymenoptera). Treubia, 21: 525-640.
Kekeçoğlu, M., Kambur Acar, M., Bir, S., Uçak, M. & Çaprazlı, T. (2020). Biodiversity of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in Turkey by geometric morphometric analysis. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 13: 282-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46309/biodicon.2020.773984
Rinderer, T.E. (1986). Bee Genetics and Breeding. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, 426p.
Rinderer, T.E., Daly, H.V., Sylvester, H.A., Collins, M., Buco, S.M., Helmıch, R.L. & Danka, R.G. (1990). Morphometric differences among Africanized and European honey bees and their hybrids (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83: 346-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.3.346
Rothenbuhler, W.C. & Kerr, W.E. (1968). Bee genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 2: 413-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.02.120168.002213
Ruttner, F. (1965). Versuch einer Charakterisierung der Carnica-Biene nach ihrem Flügelgeader. Praha: Ustav Vedeckotech Inf MZLVH, 165-172.
Ruttner, F. (1980). Apis mellifera adami. Apidologie, 11: 385-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19800407
Ruttner, F. (1984). Races of bees. In Dadant and Sons (Eds), The Hive and the Honey Bee (pp. 19-38). Illinois: Dadant and Sons. Inc.
Ruttner, F. (1987). Breeding techniques and selection for breeding of honeybee. Derby, UK: British Isles Bee Breeders’ Association, 152 p.
Ruttner, F. (1988a). Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 310 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72649-1
Ruttner, F. (1988b). Breeding technique and selection for Breeding of Honey bee. Brighton UK: G.bread and Sons. Led.
Ruttner, F. (1992). Naturgeschichte der Honigbienen. Münich, Germany: Ehrenwirth Verlag, 360 p.
Ruttner, F., Tassencourt, L. & Louveaux, J. (1978). Biometrical- Statistical analysis of the geographic variability of Apis mellifera L. Apidologie, 9: 363-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19780408
Smith, D. R., Taylor, O. R. & Brown, W. M. (1989). Neotropical Africanized honey bees have African mitochondrial DNA. Nature, 339(6221): 213-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/339213a0
Smith, D.R. & Brown, W.M. (1988). Mitochondrial DNA restriction site polymorphism American and Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera). Experientia, 44: 257-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941730
Smith, D.R. & Brown, W.M., (1990). Restriction endonuclease cleavage site and length polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA of Apis mellifera mellifera and Apis mellifera carnica (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83, 81-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.1.81
Smith, D.R. (1991). Mitochondrial DNA and honey bee biogeography. In D.R. Smith, (Eds.), Diversity in the genus Apis. Boulder. New York: CRC Press, 46 p.
Smith, D.R. (2002). Genetic diversity in Turkish honey bees. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 2: 10-17.
Smith, D.R., Slaymaker, A., Palmer, M. & Kaftanoglu, O. (1997). Turkish honey bees belong to the east Mediterranean mitochondrial lineage. Apidologie, 28: 269-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19970503
Smith, D.R., Vıllafuerte, L., Otıs, G. & Palmer, M.R. (2000). Biogeography of Apis cerana F. and A.nigrocincta Smith: insight from mtDNA studies. Apidologie, 31: 265-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000121
Tozkar, C.Ö. (2020). Genetic structure of honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758) subspecies based on tRNAleu-COX2 and ND5 regions of mtDNA. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 18: 2269-2284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1802_22692284
Ünal, G. & Özdil, F. (2018). Genetic characterization of Thrace honey bee populations of Türkiye: restriction and sequencing of inter cytochrome C oxidase I-II (CoxI-CoxII) genes. Journal of Apicultural Research, 57: 213-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2018.1426347
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Meral Kekeçoğlu, Songül Bir, Merve Kambur Acar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).