Larger Seeds are Dispersed Farther: the Long-Distance Seed Disperser ant Aphaenogaster famelica Prefers Larger Seeds

Authors

  • Satobu Takahashi Shinshu University
  • Takao Itino Shinshu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i4.888

Keywords:

Myrmecochory, plant-animal interaction, Pheidole, seed dispersal, Viola

Abstract

Seed dispersal by ants (myrmecochory) is an important life phase in flowering herbs of temperate deciduous forests, and long dispersal is basically preferable in terms of plant fitness. Although it is known that larger ants transport seeds farther, previous studies conflicted whether larger seeds are preferred by large ants. We examine how seed size and ant body size influence removal rate of seeds and their dispersal distance by ants. The obligate myrmecochorous, large-seed bearing Viola hondoensis and ant-ballistic diplochorous, small-seed bearing Viola spp. and Corydalis pallida were comparatively investigated. 1) Ant preference: attraction rate and transportation rate of large V. hondoensis seeds by ants were consistently high regardless of the disperser ant size whilst those rates of small diplochorous seeds were conspicuously lower for large Aphaenogaster ants than for small Pheidole ants, suggesting small seeds are not adapted to be carried by large ants. 2) Dispersal distance: large V. hondoensis seeds were transported for a long distance because they were carried by both large and small ants while the small diplochorous seeds were transported for a short distance because they were carried only by small ants. These results suggest that large seeds are advantageous to attract large ants and to be farther dispersed as far as ant-mediated dispersal is concerned. On the other hand, the diplochorous small seeds do not attract large ants, and so are transported short by ants although they disperse their seeds by ballistic dispersal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beattie, J.A., C.D. Culver & J.R. Pudlo 1979. Interactions between ants and the diaspores of some common spring flowering herbs in West Virginia. Castanea 44: 177-186.

Boulay B., J. Coll-Toledano, J. Manzaneda & (Cerdá X). 2007. Geographic variations in seed dispersal by ants: are plant and seed traits decisive? Naturwissenschaften 94: 242-246.

Bymee M.M. & D.J Levery. 1993. Removal of seeds from frugivore defecations by ants in a Costa Rican rain forest. Vegetatio 107/108: 363-374.

Edwards W., M. Dunlop & L. Rodgerson 2006. The evolution of rewards: seed dispersal, seed size and elaiosome size. Journal of Ecology 94: 687-694.

Fewell H.J., F.J. Harrison, R.B.J. Lighton, & D.M. Breed 1996. Foraging energetics of the ant, Paraponera clavata. Oecologia 105: 419-427.

Giladi I. 2006. Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory. Oikos 112: 481-492.

Gómez C. & X. Espadaler 1998. Seed dispersal curve of a Mediterranean myrmecochore: influence of ant size and the distance to nests. Ecological Research 13: 347-354.

Gorb S. & E. Gorb 1995. Removal rates of seeds of five myrmecochorous plants by the ant Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Oikos 73: 367-374.

Gorb E. & S. Gorb 2003. Seed dispersal by ants in a deciduous forest: ecosystem mechanisms, strategies and adaptations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

Howe F.H. & J. Smallwood 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 327-356.

Higashi S., S. Tuyuzaki, M. Ohara & F. Ito 1989. Adaptive advantages of ant-dispersed seeds in the myrmecochorous plant Trillium tschonoskii (Liliaceae) Oikos 54: 389-394.

Hughes L. & M. Westoby 1992a. Fate of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants in Australian sclerophyll vegetation. Ecology 73: 1285-1299.

Hughes L. & M. Westoby 1992b. Effect of diaspore characteristics on removal of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology 73: 1300-1312.

Lisci M. & E. Pacini 1997. Fruit and seed structural characteristics and seed dispersal in Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 66: 379-386.

Mark S. & J.M. Olesen 1996. Importance of elaiosome size to removal of ant-dispersed seeds. Oecologia 107: 95-101.

Ness J.H., J.L. Bronstein, A.N. Andersen & J.N. Holland 2004. Ant body size predicts dispersal distance of ant-adapted seeds: implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85: 1244-1250.

Ohkawara K. & S. Higashi 1994. Relative importance of ballistic and ant dispersal in two diplochorous Viola species (Volaceae). Oecologia 100: 135-140.

Pizo M.A. & P.S. Olivia 2001. Size and lipid content of nonmyrmecochorous diaspores: effects on the interaction with litter foraging ants in the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil. Plant Ecology 157: 37-52.

Stearns S.C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Vander W.S. & W.S. Longland 2004. Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 155-161.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-06

How to Cite

Takahashi, S., & Itino, T. (2015). Larger Seeds are Dispersed Farther: the Long-Distance Seed Disperser ant Aphaenogaster famelica Prefers Larger Seeds. Sociobiology, 59(4), 1401–1411. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i4.888

Issue

Section

Articles