Site Fidelity of Formica rufa: Micro-Scaled and Persistent Despite Disturbane (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Authors

  • Thomas Parmentier Ghent University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i4.892

Keywords:

site fidelity, Ortstreue, foraging behavior, ant, Formica rufa.

Abstract

Long-term site fidelity or Ortstreue is an individual foraging strategy typical of ants exploiting stable and predictable food sources in space and time. Red wood ant workers (Formica s. str.) are central-place foragers feeding on honeydew secreted by stable aphid populations. In this field study, temporal site fidelity of Formica rufa honeydew tenders was investigated on a micro-scaled level for a period of time. Additionally, the effect of exchanging honeydew workers between two trees on site fidelity was examined. Site fidelity of the honeydew tenders was very high and they returned repeatedly to particular micro-sites (branches, set of leaves) on a tree. The transfer to a new feeding site apparently did not influence site fidelity as honeydew tenders mainly return to their initial tree. Small-scale site fidelity decreased with time and was not so rigid as larger-scale fidelity. We discuss how site fidelity on one hand and flexibility in foraging and recruiting on the other hand promote foraging efficiency of the colony.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beverly, B.D., H. McLendon, S. Nacu, S. Holmes & D.M. Gordon 2009. How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants. Behavioral Ecology 20: 633-638.

Ebbers, B.C. & E.M. Barrows 1980. Individual ants specialize on particular aphid herds (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Homoptera: Aphididae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 82: 405–407.

Fretwell, S.D. & H.L. Lucas 1970. On the territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19 (1): 16-36.

Herbers, J.M. 1977. Behavioral constancy in Formica obscuripes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 70: 485–486.

Hölldobler, B. & E.O. Wilson 1990. The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 752 pp.

Horstmann, K. 1976. Über die Duftspur-orientierung bei Waldameisen (Formica polyctena Förster). Insectes sociaux 23: 227-242.

Johnson, N.L., A.W. Kemp & S. Kotz 2005. Univariate discrete distributions. John Wiley and Sons. 654 pp.

Lamb, A.E & J.G. Ollason 1994a. Site fidelity in wood-ants Formica aquilonia Yarrow and its influence on the distribution of foragers in a regenerating environment. Behavioral Processes 31: 309-321.

Lamb, A.E. & J.G. Ollason 1994b. Trail-laying and recruitment to sugary foods by foraging red-wood ants Formica aquilonia Yarrow (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Processes 31: 111-124.

Loose, G., G. Geudens & S. Vandenbroeck 2007. Uitgebreid bosbeheerplan Duinbossen in De Haan, Wenduine en Klemskerke met bosreservaat Jan De Schuyter. : Eindrapport. Haskoning Belgium/Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos: Mechelen. 72 pp.

Mabelis, A.A. 1979. Wood ant wars: the relationship between aggression and predation in the red wood ant (Formica polyctena Först.). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 29: 451-620.

Mody K. & K.E. Linsenmair 2003. Finding its place in a competitive ant community: leaf fidelity of Camponotus sericeus. Insectes Sociaux 50: 191-198.

Quinet, Y. & J.M. Pasteels 1996. Spatial specialization of the foragers and foraging strategy in Lasius fuliginosus (Latreille) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 43: 333-346.

Rosengren, R. 1971. Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behavior in foraging wood ants of the genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zoologica Fennica 133: 3-91. In Rosengren 1977b. Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). II. Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity.

Rosengren, R. 1977a. Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). I. Age polyethism and topographic traditions. Acta Zoologica Fennica 149: 1-30. In Salo & Rosengren 2001. Memory of location and site recognition in the ant Formica uralensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Rosengren, R. 1977b. Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). II. Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity. Acta Zoologica Fennica 150: 1-30.

Rosengren, R. & W. Fortelius. 1986. Ortstreue in foraging ants of the Formica rufa group – hierarchy of orienting cues and long-term memory. Insectes Sociaux 33: 306-337.

Rosengren, R. & W. Fortelius 1987. Trail communication and directional recruitment to food in red wood ants (Formica). Annales Zoologica Fennica 149: 1-30.

Rosengren, R. & L. Sundström 1987. The foraging system of a red wood ant colony (Formicas. str.) – collecting and defending food through an extended phenotype. Experientia Supplumenta 54: 117-137. In Wright et al. 2000. The size-distance relationship in the wood ant Formica rufa.

Salo, O. & R. Rosengren 2001. Memory of location and site recognition in the ant Formica uralensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 107: 737-752.

Tilles, D.A. & D.L. Wood. 1986. Foraging behavior of the carpenter ant, Camponotus modoc (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), in a giant sequoia forest. Canadian Entomologist 118: 861-867.

Wright, P.J., R. Bonser & U.O. Chukwu. 2000. The size-distance relationship in the wood ant Formica rufa. Ecological Entomology 25: 226-233.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-07

How to Cite

Parmentier, T. (2015). Site Fidelity of Formica rufa: Micro-Scaled and Persistent Despite Disturbane (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 59(4), 1413–1425. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i4.892

Issue

Section

Articles