Whiteflies Provide Honeydew to Camponotus ants Without Receiving Reciprocal Favor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.900Keywords:
tending ants, Camponotus, woolly whitefly, honeydew, citrus, biological controlAbstract
The notion that tending ants provide protection to honeydew-producing hemipterans is widely accepted. Nevertheless, there have been debates about whether or not this protection can always disrupt the biological control of hemipterans. Although various hemipteran species interact with tending ants, most studies have focused on the mutualism between ants and aphids. Woolly whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) is an important pest of citrus whose nymphs are frequently tended by ants such as Camponotus. However, it is unknown whether or not ants in this genus can disrupt biological control of woolly whitefly by protecting this pest’s nymphs from natural enemies. We investigated the impact of Camponotus ants on the biological control of woolly whitefly in the field by excluding or allowing the access of ants to whitefly nymph colonies in different tangerine trees. Furthermore, in a laboratory study we also assessed the behavior of Camponotus ants in response to woolly whitefly’s common predator cues (visual and scent). In summary, this field-laboratory study suggests that there is no mutualism between tending Camponotus ants and the whitefly A. floccosus; rather it indicates commensalism as an alternative interaction. Interactions as this may provide more benefits for the host plant, whereby Camponotus ants can reduce sooty mold by removing honeydew from the leaves and favor pest biological control by leaving the whiteflies unprotected.
Downloads
References
Banks C.J. (1962): Effects of the ant, Lasius niger (L.), on insects preying on small populations of Aphis fabae Scop. on bean plants. Ann. Appl. Biol., 50: 669-679. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1962.tb06067.x
Beley D.K, Zewdu A., Foster J.A. (2011). Ecology and management of the woolly whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a new invasive citrus pest in Ethiopia. J. Econ. Entomol., 104: 1329-38. DOI:org/10.1603/EC11017
Bonser R., Wright P.J., Bament S., Chukwu U.O. (1998). Optimal patch use by foraging workers of Lasius fuliginosus, L. niger, and Myrmica ruginodis. Ecol. Entomol., 23: 15-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00103.x
Bretton L.M., Addicott J.F. (1992). Density-dependent mutualism in an aphid-ant interaction. Ecology 73: 2175-2180. DOI:org/10.2307/1941465
Bristow C.M. (1991). Why are so few aphids ant-tended? Ant–Plant Interactions. In Huxley CR & Cutler DF (eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 104-119.
Buckley R. (1987). Interactions involving plants, Homoptera, and ants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18: 111-135. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.000551
Cannon C.A., Fell R.D. (2002). Patterns of macronutrient collection in the black carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol., 31: 977-981. DOI:org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.6.977
Cushman J.H., Addicott J.F. (1991). Conditional interactions in ant-plant-herbivore mutualisms. In Huxley CR & Cutler DF (eds.): Ant-plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 92-103.
Cushman J.H., Whitham T.G. (1989). Conditional mutualism in a membracid-ant association: temporal, age-specific, and density-dependent effects. Ecology 70: 1040-1047. DOI: 10.2307/1941372
Cushmam J.H., Whitham T.G. (1991). Competition mediating the outcome of a mutualism: protective services of ants as a limiting resource for membracids. Am. Nat., 138: 851-865.
Dansa C.V.A., Rocha, C.F.D. (1992). An ant-membracid plant interaction in cerrado area of Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol., 8: 339-348. DOI:org/10.1017/S0266467400006635
DeBach P., Rose M. (1976). Biological control of woolly whitefly. California Agriculture, May, 4-7.
Del-Claro K., Oliveira P.S. (1996). Honeydew flicking by treehoppers provide cues to potential tending ants. Anim. Behav., 51: 1071-1075. DOI:10.1006/anbe.1996.0108
Del-Claro K., Oliveira P.S. (1999). Ant-homoptera interactions in a Neotropical Savanna: the honeydew-producing treehopper, Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae), and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae). Biotropica 31: 135-144.
Del-Claro K., Oliveira P.S. (2000). Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia. 124: 156-165. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050002
Feldhaar H., Straka J., Krischke M., Berthold K., Stoll S., Mueller M.J., Gross R. (2007). Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia. BMC Biol., 5: 1-11.
Fishcher M.K., Shingleton A.W. (2001). Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct. Ecol., 15: 544-550. DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00550.x
Flatt T., Weisser W.W. (2000). The effects of mutualistic ants on aphid life histories. Ecology 81: 3522-3529.DOI: org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3522:TEOMAO]2.0.CO;2
Floate K.D., Whitham T.G. (1994). Aphid-ant interactions reduces chrysomelid herbivory in a cottonwood hybrid zone. Oecologia 97: 215-221.
Fowler H.G., Roberts R.B. (1980). Foraging behavior of the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Jersey. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 53: 295-304.
Ghahhari H., Hatami B. (2000). Study on natural enemies of whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Isfahan Province. J. Entomol. Soc. Iran., 20: 1-24.
Hendrix D.L., Wei Y., Leggett J.E. (1992). Homopteran honeydew sugar composition is determined by both the insect and plant species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 101: 23-27. DOI:10.1016/0305-0491(92)90153-I
Hölldobler B., Wilson E.O. (1990). The ants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
Kaplan I., Eubanks M.D. (2002). Disruption of cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) - natural enemy dynamics by red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol., 31: 1175-1183. DOI: org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.6.1175
Kiss A. (1981). Melezitose, aphids and ants. Oikos. 37: 382.
Majerus M.E.N., Sloggett J.J., Godeau J.F., Hemptinne, J.L. (2007). Interactions between ants and aphidophagous and coccidophagous ladybirds. Popul. Ecol., 49: 15-27. DOI: 10.1007/s10144-006-0021-5
Nemec V., Starý P. (1990). Sugars in honeydew. Biologia (Bratislava) 45: 259-264.
Pasteels J.M., Deroe C., Tursch B., Brakeman J.C., Daloze D., Hootele C. (1973). Distribution et activites des alcaloides defensifs des Coccinellidae. J. Insect Physiol., 19: 1771-1784. DOI:10.1016/0022-1910(73)90046-2
Queiroz J.M., Oliveira P.S. (2001). Tending ants protect honeydew-producing whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ. Entomol., 30: 295-297. DOI: org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.2.295
Richards A.M. (1985): Biology and defensive adaptations in Rodatus major (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and its prey, Monophlebus pilosior (Hemiptera: Margarodidae). J. Zool., 205: 287-295.
Rodrigues W.C., Cassino P.C.R. (2011). Interação entre formigas e aleirodídeos (Sternorrhyncha, Aleyrodidae) em cultivo orgânico de tangerina cv. Ponca (Citrus reticulata Blanco). EntomoBrasilis, 4: 119-124.
Samways M.J. (1983). Interrelationship between an entomogenous fungus and two ant-homopteran (Hymenoptera: Formicidae - Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae and Aphididae) mutualisms on guava trees. B. Entomol. Res., 73: 321-331.
Stadler B., Dixon A.F.G. (2005): Ecology and evolution of aphid-ant interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36: 345-372. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175531
Vinson S.B., Scarborough T.A. (1991). Interactions between Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae), and the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 84: 158-164. DOI: org/10.1093/aesa/84.2.158
Völkl W. (1992). Aphids or their parasitoids: who actually benefits from ant-attendance? J. Anim. Ecol., 61: 273-281.
Völkl W., Woodring J., Fischer M., Lorenz M.W., Hoffmann K.H. (1999). Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia. 118: 483-491. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050751
Way M.J. (1963). Mutualism between ants and honeydew producing Homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 8: 307-344. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001515
Wäckers F.L., van Rijn P.C.J., Heimpel G.E. (2008). Honeydew as a food source for natural enemies: Making the best of a bad meal? Biol. Control, 45: 176-184. DOI:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.007
Wood T.K. (1984). Life history patterns of tropical membracids (Homoptera: Membracidae). Sociobiology, 8: 299-344.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
