Composition and Richness of Arboreal ants in Fragments of Brazilian Caatinga: Effects of Secondary Succession
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.909Keywords:
Tropical dry forest, habitat structure, bioindicators, ant diversityAbstract
Ecological succession is a complex processes involving changes in the structure of plant community and it is an important factor determining the structure of arboreal ants assemblages, but little is known about the effects of succession on ant assemblages in regions of Tropical Dry Forests (TDFs), such as the Brazilian Caatinga. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ecological succession on the richness and species composition of arboreal ants in fragments of Caatinga, testing the following hypothesis: i) the richness of arboreal ants increases along a gradient of forest succession, in response to tree richness and/or density; ii) species composition of arboreal ants differs among stages of forest succession due to differences in vegetation structure in theses stages. This study was conducted in 15 plots distributed in three areas with different stages of secondary succession (early, intermediate and late). Tree density and richness were used as surrogate of vegetation structure. Ants were sampled using the technique of beating the foliage and baited pitfall traps, where five trees were sampled per plot, totaling 75 individual trees sampled. We sampled 37 species of ants, distributed in 16 genera and five subfamilies. Ant richness differed among stages of succession and seasons, with higher number of species in the late succession and rainy period, also increasing with tree richness and density. Besides, there was a distinct composition of ant species among stages of succession and seasons. Results obtained in this study reinforce the importance of using ants as environmental bioindicators, since the sensitivity to environmental variations of this group enables us to differentiate early and late successional stages of forest succession in Caatinga environment.
Downloads
References
Adis, J., Lubin, Y.D. & Montgomery, G.G. (1984). Arthropods from the canopy of inundated and terra firme forest near Manaus, Brazil with critical considerations on the pyrethrum-fogging technique. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 19: 223-236.
Anderson, M.J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26: 32-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
Andrade-Lima, D. (1981). The Caatingas dominium. Rev. Bras. Bot., 4: 149-163.
Arnan, X., Gaucherel, C. & Andersen, A.N. (2011). Dominance and species co-occurrence in highly diverse ant communities: a test of the interstitial hypothesis and discovery of a three-tiered competition cascade. Oecologia 166: 783–794.
Bazzaz, F.A. (1975). Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology, 56: 485–488. doi: 10.2307/1934981
Bernstein, R.A. (1975). Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density. Ecology, 56: 213-219.
Bolton, B. (1994). Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 222 p
Brühl, C.A., Gunsalam, G. & Linsenmair, K.E. (1998). Stratification of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidade) in a primary rain Forest in Sabah, Borneo. J. Trop. Ecol., 14: 285–297.
Campos, R., Vasconcelos, H.L., Ribeiro, S.P., Neves, F.S. & Soares, J.P. (2006). Relationship between tree size and insect assemblages associated with Anadenanthera macrocarpa. Ecography, 29: 442–450. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04520.x
Castaño-Meneses, G. (2014). Trophic Guild Structure of a Canopy Ants Community in a Mexican Tropical Deciduous Forest. Sociobiology 61: 35-42. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.35-42
Clarke, K.R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
Corrêa, M.M., Fernandes, W.D. & Leal, I.R. (2006). Diversidade de formigas epigéicas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em Capões do Pantanal Sul Matogrossense: Relações entre riqueza de espécies e complexidade estrutural da área. Neotrop. Entomol. 35: 724-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2006000600002
Crawley, M.J. (2013). Statistical computing – an introduction to data analysis using s-plus 2nd Edition. London: John Wiley & Sons 1076 p
Erwin, T. L. (1989). Canopy arthropod biodiversity: a chronology of sampling techniques and results. Rev. Per. Entomol. 32: 71–77.
Espírito-Santo, M.M., Sevilha, A.C., Anaya, F.C., Barbosa, R.,
Fernandes, G.W., Sánchez-Azofeifa, G.A., Scariot, A., Noronha, S.E. & Sampaio, C.A. (2009). Sustainability of tropical dry forests: Two case studies in southeastern and central Brazil. Forest Ecol. Manag., 258: 922-930. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.022
Fernández, F. (2003). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 424 p
Frizzo, T.L.M., Campos, R.I. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2012) Contrastingeffects of fire on arboreal and ground-dwelling ant communities of aneotropical savanna. Biotropica 44: 254 – 261. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00797.x
Gomes, E.C.F., Ribeiro, G.T., Silva, T.M. & Sousa-Souto, L. (2014). Ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in three different stages of forest regeneration in a fragment of Atlantic Forest in Sergipe, Brazil. Sociobiology 61: 250-257. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i3.250-257
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p
Kalacska, M., Sanchez-Azofeita, G.A., Calvo-Alvarado, J.C., Quesada, M., Rivard, B. & Janzen, D.H. (2004). Species composition, similarity and diversity in three sucessional stages of a seasonally dry tropical Forest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 200: 227–247. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.001
Klimes, P., Idigel, C., Rimandai, M., Fayle, T.M., Janda M., Weiblen, G.D. & Novotny, V. (2012). Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests? J. Anim. Ecol., 81: 1103–1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x.
Lassau, S.A. & Hochuli, D.F. (2005). Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27: 157–164. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03675.x
Leal, I.R., Silva, J.M.C., Tabarelli, M. & Lacher Júnior, T.E. (2005). Mudando o curso da conservação da biodiversidade na Caatinga do Nordeste do Brasil. Megadiversidade 1: 139-146.
Leal, I.R. (2003). Diversidade de formigas em diferentes unidades de paisagem da Caatinga. In: I.R. Leal, M. Tabarelli & J.M.C. Silva (Eds.), Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga. (pp. 435-461). Recife: Editora Universitária UFPE.
Lewinsohn, T.M., Freitas, A.V.L & Prado, PI. (2005). Conservation of terrestrial invertebrates and their habitats in Brazil. Conserv. Biol., 19: 640–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00682.x
Lindsey, P.A. & Skinner, J.D., (2001). Ant composition and activity patterns as determined by pitfall trapping and other methods in three habitats in the semi-arid Karoo. J. Arid Environ. 48: 551–568. doi:10.1006/jare.2000.0764
Martinez, J-J. I. (2015). Monopolization of resources by ground-nesting ants foraging on trees in Mediterranean forests. Acta Oecol. 65: 11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2015.03.002
Neves, F.S., Araújo, L.S., Espírito-Santo, M.M., Fagundes, M., Fernandes, G.W., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A. & Quesada, M. (2010c). Canopy Herbivory and Insect Herbivore Diversity in a Dry Forest–Savanna Transition in Brazil. Biotropica. 42: 112–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00541.x
Neves, F.S., Braga, R.F., Espírito-Santo, M.M., Delabie, J.H.C., Fernandes, G.W. & Sanchez-Azofeifa G.A. (2010b). Diversity of Arboreal Ants in a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest: Effects of Seasonality and Successional Stage. Sociobiology. 56: 1–18.
Neves, F.S., Oliveira, V.H.F., Espírito-Santo, M.M., Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z., Louzada, J. & Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A. & Fernandes, G.W. (2010a). Successional and Seasonal Changes in a Community of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest. Nat. Conserv. 8: 160–164. doi: 10.4322/natcon.00802009
Neves, F.S., Queiroz-Dantas, K.S., Rocha, W.D. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2013). Ants of three adjacent habitats of a transition region between the cerrado and caatinga biomes: the effects of heterogeneity and variation in canopy cover. Neot. Entomol. 42: 258-268. doi: 10.1007/s13744-013-0123-7
Neves, F.S., Silva, J.O., Marques, T., Mota-Souza, J. G., Madeira, B. G., Espírito-Santo, M. M. & Fernandes, G. W. (2014). Spatiotemporal dynamics of insects in a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest. In: A. Sanchez-Azofeifa, J.S. Powers, G.W. Fernandes & M. Quesada. (Eds.). Human and Biophysical dimensions of Tropical Dry Forests. (pp. 225-239) Taylor and Francis.
Nunes, F.A., Martins Segundo, G.B., Vasconcelos, Y.B., Azevedo, R. & Quinet, Y. (2011). Ground-foraging ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and rainfall effect on pitfall trapping in a deciduous thorn woodland (Caatinga), Northeastern Brazil. Rev. Biol. Trop. 59: 1637–1650.
Oliveira, D.G., Prata, A.P.N., Sousa-Souto, L. & Ferreira, R.A. (2013). Does the edge effect influences plant community structure in a tropical dry forest? Rev. Árvore 37: 311-320.
Pennington, R.T., Prado, D.E. & Pendry, C.A. (2000). Neotropical seasonally dry forests and Quaternary vegetation changes. J. Biogeogr. 27: 261-273. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00397.x
Quesada, M., Sánchez-Azofeifa, G.A., Álvarez-Añorve, M., Stoner, K.E., Ávila-Cabadilla, L., Calvo-Alvarado, J., Castillo, A., Espírito-Santo, M.M., Fagundes, M., Fernandes, G.W., Gamon, J., López-Araiza-Mikel, M., Lawrence, D., Morellato, L.P.C., Powers, J.S., Neves, F.S., Rosas-Guerrero, V., Sayago, R. & Sanchez-
Montoya, G. (2009). Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives. Forest Ecol. Manag., 258: 1014–1024.
R Development Core Team (2011), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria : the R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/.
Resende, J.J., Peixoto, P.E.C., Silva, E.N., Delabie, J.H.C. & Santos, G.M.M. (2013). Arboreal ant assemblages respond differently to food source and vegetation physiognomies: A study in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest. Sociobiology, 60: 174-182. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v60i2.174-182
Ribas, C.R. & Schoereder, J.H. (2002). Are all ant mosaics caused by competition? Oecologia 131: 606–611.
Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecol. 28: 305–314. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x
Ribas, C.R. & Schoereder, J.H. (2007). Ant communities, environmental characteristics and their implications for conservation in the Brazil Pantanal. Biodivers. Conserv., 16: 1511–1520.
Ribeiro S.P., Espírito Santo, N.B., Delabie, J.H.C & Majer, J.D. (2013a). Competition, resources and the ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) mosaic: a comparison of upper and lower canopy. Myrmecol. News. 18: 113-120.
Ribeiro, V.A., Silva, R.N., Sousa-Souto, L. & Neves, F.S. (2013b). Fluctuating asymmetry of and herbivory on Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul.) L.P. Queiroz (Fabaceae) in pasture and secondary tropical dry forest. Acta Bot. Bras. 27: 21–25.
Romero-Alcaraz, E. & Avila, J.M. (2000). Landscape heterogeneity in relation to variation in epigaeic beetle diversity of a Mediterranean ecosystem. Implications for conservation. Biodivers. Conserv., 9: 985–1005.
Sampaio, E.V.S.B. (1995). Overview of the Brazilian Caatinga. In S.H. Bullock, H.A. Mooney & E. Medina (Eds.), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests (pp. 35-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoener, T.W. (1970). Theory of feeding strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 360-404.
Silva, E.M., Medina, A.M., Nascimento, I.C., Lopes, P.P., Carvalho, K.S. & Santos, G.M.M. (2014). Does ant community richness and composition respond to phytophysiognomical complexity and seasonality in xeric environments? Sociobiology 61: 155-163. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.155-163
Sousa-Souto, L., Santos, E.D.S., Figueiredo, P.M.F.G, Santos, A.J. & Neves, F.S. (2014). Is there a bottom-up cascade on the assemblages of trees, arboreal insects and spiders in a semiarid Caatinga? Arthropod-Plant Int. 8: 581-591. doi: 10.1007/s11829-014-9341-0
Stork, N.E. (1988). Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 321–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00474.x
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M.C., Schwager, M. & Jeltsch, F. (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 31:79–92. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
Ulysséa, M.A. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2013). Ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the seasonally dry tropical forest of northeastern Brazil: a compilation from field surveys in Bahia and literature records. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 57: 217-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013005000002
Vargas, A.B., Mayhé-Nunes, A.J., Queiroz, J.M., Souza, G.O. & Ramos, E.F. (2007). Efeitos de fatores ambientais sobre a mimercofauna em comunidade de restinga no Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Neotrop. Entomol., 36: 028–037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2007000100004
Vasconcellos, A., Bandeira, A.G., Moura, F.M.S., Araújo, V.F.P., Gusmão, M.A.B. & Constantino, R. (2010). Termite assemblages in three habitats under different disturbance regimes in the semi-arid Caatinga of NE Brazil. J. Arid Environ. 74: 298–302. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.07.007
Vasconcelos, H.L. (1999). Effects of forest disturbance on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in central Amazonia. Biodivers. Conserv., 8: 409–420.
Vasconcelos, H.L., Frizzo, T.L.M., Pacheco, R., Maravalhas, J.B., Camacho, G.P., Carvalho, K.S., Koch, E.B.A. & Pujol-Luz, J.R. (2014). Evaluating sampling sufficiency and the use of surrogates for assessing ant diversity in a Neotropical biodiversity hotspot. Ecol. Ind., 46: 286-292. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.036
Wilson, E.O. (1976). Which are the most prevalent ant genera? Studia Entomology, 9: 187-200.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
