Lipid Food Preference and Transportation Using Tools by an Indian Ant Species Monomorium pharaonis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): A Field Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v70i4.9167Keywords:
Monomorium pharaonis, lipids, foraging, Quality Assessment ToolsAbstract
Besides proteins and carbohydrates, the Pharaoh ant (Monomoroium pharaonis) prefers lipid foods especially when it becomes limiting in the colony. We used four different food-grade lipids such as mustard oil, sunflower oil, coconut oil and butter for seven consecutive days for a specified time frame (11.15 hr - 14.15 hr). There was a specific time zone in which the highest number of ants accumulated at all four food baits with varying peak values. Sunflower oil was the most preferred food, and mustard oil showed the lowest like. The differential number of ants in all four lipid food baits under observation can be attributed to the physical features and nutrient content. We also noted an interesting feature of the foraging activity: the major role of gathering and transporting food was performed primarily by two castes, intermediate and large, among the four distinct foraging castes. Most tools used in the present investigation were <0.5mm and of naturally available sand particles. They used the smallest tools more often as compared with the size of the other two categories. Our ant (M. pharaonis) transported only the butter-soaked smallest tools back to the nest. M. pharaonis used the smallest tools more often and this could be because the particular-sized tools were efficiently managed by the ant species under study. Our ants transported only the butter-soaked smallest tools back to the nest. It is revealed that butter was the most important lipid food for the particular ant colony of M. pharaonis.
Downloads
References
Aminipouri, M., Knudby, A., Krayenhoff, E.S. & Zickfeld, K. (2019). Modelling the impact of increased street tree cover on mean radiant temperature across Vancouver’s local climate zones. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 39: 9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.016
Banik S., Biswas, S., Karmakar, R. & Bramhachary, R.L. (2011). A comparative account of behaviour pattern in two Indian ant species in captivity. Proceedings of Zoological Society, 64: 23-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-011-0003-2
Barbero, F. (2016). Cuticular lipids as a cross-talk among ants plants and butterflies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17: 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121966
Bayes, S.K., Hellerstein, M.K. Fitch, M., Mills, N.J. & Welter, S.C. (2014). You are what you eat: Fatty acid profiles as a method to track the habitat movement of an insect. Oecologia 175: 1073–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2976-9
Bentley-Condit, V.K. & Smith, E.O. (2010). Animal tool-use: Current definitions and an updated comprehensive catalog. Behaviour, 147: 185-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/000579509X12512865686555
Blȕthgen, N. & Feldhaar, H. (2010). Food and shelter: How resources influence ant ecology. In: Ant Ecology (Eds. L Lach, C.L. Parr & K.L. Abbott) Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544639.003.0007
Boonen, S. & Billen, J. (2017). Caste regulation in the ant Monomorium pharaonis (L) with emphasis on the role of queens. Insectes Sociaux, 64: 113-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0521-z
Cammaerts, M.C. (2013a). Age dependent saptiotemporal learning in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge d’Entomologie, 149: 205-212. https://biblio.naturalsciences.be/associated_publications/societe-royale-belge-dentomologie-koninklijke-belgische-vereniging-voor-entomologie-1/srbe-147-2011-1/cammaerts_bull149-3-2013_205-212.pdf
Cammaerts, M.C. (2013b). Saptiotemporal learning in three Myrmica species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge d’Entomologie, 149: 131-138. https://biblio.naturalsciences.be/associated_publications/societe-royale-belge-dentomologie-koninklijke-belgische-vereniging-voor-entomologie-1/srbe-147-2011-1/cammaerts_bulletin-srbe-kbve-149-2-2013_131-138.pdf
Cammaerts, M.C. & Cammaerts, R. (2015). Expectative behaviour can be acquired by ants in the course of life. Trends in Entomology II: 73-85. https://www.researchtrends.net/tia/article_pdf.asp?in=0&vn=11&tid=20&aid=5787
Cammaerts, M.C. & Cammaerts, R. (2016). Ants can expect the time of an event on basis of previous experiences. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2016: 9473128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9473128
Cuthill, I.C. & Houston, A.I. (1997). Managing time and energy. In: Behavioural Ecology (Eds. J.R. Krebs & B.N. Davies) 4th Ed., Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp. 97-120.
Dadd, R.H. (1985). Nutrition: Organisms. In: Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol 4, Regulation, Digestion, Nutrition, Excretion (Eds. G.A. Kerkut & L.I. Gilbert) Oxford, Pergamon Press, pp. 313-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030805-0.50014-6
Das, D. & Das, A. (2003). Statistics in Biology and Psychology. 4th Ed., Academic Publishers, Kolkata, India.
Elizabeth, B. (1977). The hungry fly: A physiological study of the behaviour associated with feeding. VG Quarterly Review of Biology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52: 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/409785
Erdos, M.D. & Koncz, A. (1977). Experience in the Pharaoh ants in Hungary. International Pest Control, 19: 12-13.
Fellers, J.H. & Fellers, G.M. (1976). Tool use in a social insect and its implications for competitive interactions. Science, 192: 70-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.192.4234.70
Goteceitas, V. (1990). Foraging and predator avoidance: A test of patch choice model with juvenile bluegill sunfish. Oecologia, 83: 346-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317558
Gozman-Hernandez, I. (2019). Oil preference in ants and arthropod diversity in urban environments. Honors Thesis. UTC Scholar, University of Tenesse, Chittanooga, USA.
Heyamn, Y., Vilk, Y. & Feinerman, O. (2019). Ants use multiple spatial memories and chemical pointers to navigate their nest. iScience, 14: 264-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.04.003
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Harvard University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
Hunt, G.R., Gray, R.D. & Taylor, A.H. (2013). Why is tool use rare in animals? In: Tool use animals: Cognition and Ecology (Eds. C.M. Sanz, J. Call & C. Boesch) Cambridge University Press, pp. 89-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894800.007
Joseph, R.M. & Carlson, J.R. (2015). Drosophila chemoreceptors: A molecular interface between the chemical world and the brain. Trends in Genetics, 31: 683-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.09.005
Judd, T.M. (2006). Relationship between food stores and foraging behavior of Pheidole ceres (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99: 398-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2006)099[0398:RBFSAF]2.0.CO;2
Klots, A. & Klots, E. (1959). Living insects of the world. Garden City, New York, Doubleday and Company Inc.
Lighton, J.R.B., Weier, J.A. & Feener, D.H. Jr (1993). The energetics of locomotion and load carriage in the desert harvester ant. Pogonomyrmex rugosus. Journal of Experimental Biology, 181: 49-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.181.1.49
Loke, P.Y. & Lee, C.Y. (2006). Effects of colony composition and food type on nutrient distribution in colonies of Monomorium orientale (Hymenoptera: formicidae). Journal Economical Entomology, 99: 129-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.1.129
Lőrinczi, G., Módra, G., Juhász, O. & Maák, I. (2018). Which tools to use? Choice optimization in the tool-using ant, Aphaenogaster subterranea. Behavioral Ecology, 29: 1444-1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary110
Maák, I.G., Lőrinczi, P., Quinquis, G., Módra, D., Bovet, J., Call J. & d’Ettorre, P. (2017). Tool selection during foraging in two species of funnel ants. Animal Behaviour, 123: 207-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.005
McDonald, P. (1984). Tool use by the ant, Novomessor albisetosus (Mayr). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 92: 156-161.
Narendra, A. & Sunil Kumar, M. (2006). On a Trail with Ants: A Handbook of the Ants of Peninsular India. Tholasi Publisher, Bangaluru, India.
Nyamukondiwa, C. & Addison, P. (2014). Food preference and foraging activity of ants: Recommendations for field applications of low-toxicity baits. Journal of Insect Society, 14: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1673/031.014.48
Oakley, K.P. (1951). A definition of a man. Science News, 20: 69-81.
Oliveira, S., Andrade, H. & Vaz, T. (2011). The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: A case study in Lisbon. Building and Environment, 46: 2186-2194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.034
Oliveras, J., Bas, J.M., Casellas, D. & Gómez, C. (2005). Numerical dominance of Argentine ant vs native ants and consequence of soil resource searching in Mediterranean Cork-oak forests (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 45: 1-10. http://hdl.handle.net/10256/8251
Penick, C.A., Savage A.M. & Dunn, R.R. (2015). Stable isotopes reveal links between human food inputs and urban ant Diets. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282: 2014-2608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2608
Qin, W., Chen, X., Hooper-Bùi, L.M., Cai, J., Wang, L., Sun, Z., Wen, X. & Wang, C. (2019). Food-burying behavior in red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Peer Journal, 7: e6349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6349
Richards, H.H. (2022). Tool use by foraging ants. Insectes Sociaux, 69: 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00855-7
Rosumek, F.B., Brückner, A., Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Heethoff, M. (2017). Patterns and dynamics of neutral lipid fatty acids in ants-implications for ecological studies. Frontiers in Zoology, 14:36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-017-0221-1
Rudolph, S.G. & Loudon, C. (1986). Load size selection by foraging leafcutter (Atta cephalotes). Ecological Entomology, 11: 401-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1986.tb00319.x
Rust, M.K., Reierson, D.A., Paine, E. & Blum, L.J. (2000). Seasonal activity and bait preferences of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 17: 201-212.
Sengupta, P., Ghorai, N. & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Food preference and foraging of fire ant Solenopsis nitens. Proceeding of Zoological Society, 63: 73-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-010-0010-8
Shumaker, R.W., Walkup, K.R. & Beck, B.B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tool by animals. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Simpson, S.J. & Raubenheimer, D. (2012). The nature of nutrition: A unifying framework from animal adaptation to human obesity. Princeton University Press, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842803
Sperfeld, E., Wagner, N.D., Halvorson, H.M., Malishev, M. & Raubenheimer, D. (2017). Bridging ecological stoichiometry and nutritional geometry with homeostasis concepts and integrative models of organism nutrition. Functional Ecology, 31: 286-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12707
St. Amant, R. & Horton, T.E. (2008). Revisiting the definition of tool use. Animal Behaviour, 75: 1199-1208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.028
Stanley-Samuelson, D.W., Jurenka, R.A., Cripps, C., Blomquist, G.J. & Renobales, M. (1988). Fatty Acids in Insects: Composition, metabolism, and biological significance. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 9: 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.940090102
Tanaka, T. & Ono, Y. (1978). The tool use by foragers of Aphaenogaster famelica. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 28: 49-58.
Thoma, V., Kobayashi, K. & Tanimoto H. (2017). The role of the gustatory system in the coordination of feeding. eNeuro, 4: 0324-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0324-17.2017
Torres-Contreas, H. & Vasquez, R.A. (2004). A field experiment on the influence of load transportation and patch distance on the locomotion velocity of Dorymyrmex goetschi (Hym.: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux, 51: 265-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-004-0737-1
Vinson, S.B. & Sorensen, A.A. (1986). Imported Fire ants: Life history and impact. The Texas Department of Agriculture, PO Box 1287, Austin, Texas 78711.
Wang, C., Chen X., Hooper-Bùi, L.M. & R. Strecker (2018). How do groups of red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) feed on droplet of sugar water? Insect Science, 25: 499-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12435
Wheeler, W.M. (1910). Ants: Their structure, development, and behavior. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.1937
Wilson, G.R. & Booth, M.J. (1981). Pharaoh ant control with IGR in hospitals. Pest Control, 49: 14-19, 74.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ritika Sarkar, Sarmistha Banik, Ranajit Karmakar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
