Ants Sleep, Plants do not: The Variation in Species’ Activity Influences the Topology of Interaction Networks

Authors

  • José Eneas Schramm Júnior Feira de Santana State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
  • Gabriela S. Oliveira Feira de Santana State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
  • Tamires B. Santos Feira de Santana State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
  • Gilberto Marcos de M. Santos Feira de Santana State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v70i4.9283

Keywords:

Optimal Defense, Ant/Plant Interaction, Context-dependent mutualism, Extra Floral Nectar, Interaction networks, Temporal variation

Abstract

The emergence of graph theory allowed using the complex network approach to aggregate detailed information about interactions between species. Although the use of the complex network approach has improved the understanding about community structuring, few aspects such as the temporal variation in the species’ activity pattern in the networks’ topology were explored so far. The current study used the ecological network approach to investigate ants interacting in the extrafloral nectary (EFN) of plants in order to test the hypothesis that the temporal variation in the foraging behavior of these animals affects the networks’ topology. In order to assess the temporal effect on the interaction networks, 24-hour collections divided in two 12-hour shifts (day and night) were performed in 20 plots, thus totaling 288 collection hours over 6 months. The ant-plant interaction networks presented similarity among the topological metrics assessed throughout the day. Different ant species presented distinct foraging times. Thus, two modules referring to the day and night shifts emerged from the network and presented specific species at each foraging shift. On the other hand, the plants kept on providing the resource (active EFNs) throughout the day. The results found in the current study have shown that ecological networks keep their structures constant; however, the ecological processes ruling these networks can better respond to the effects caused, for example, by the temporal variation in species’ activity. Therefore, it is worth always taking into consideration the importance of ecological processes at the time to analyze interactions in the nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agosti, D., Majer, J.D., Alonso, L.E. & Schultz, T.R. (2000). Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington. 280 p.

Allesina, S. & Levine, J.M. (2011). A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108: 5638-5642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014428108

Almeida-Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, J.P.R., Loyola, R.D., Ulrich, W., Guimarães, P.R.J., Loyota, R.D. & Ulrich, W. (2008). A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos, 117: 1227-1239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16644.x

Amaral, L.A.N. & Ottino, J.M. (2004). Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. European Physical Journal B, 38: 147-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00110-5

Araujo, M.S., Guimarães, P.R., Svanback, R., Pinheiro, A., Guimaraes, P., dos Reis, S.F. & Bolnick, D.I. (2008). Network Analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individuals vs. population diets. Ecology, 89: 1193-1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0630.1

Aschoff, J. (1966). Circadian Activity Pattern with Two Peaks. Ecological Society of America, 47: 657-662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1933949

Bascompte, J. (2007). Networks in ecology. Basic and Applied Ecology, 8: 485-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.06.003

Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. (2007). Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38: 567-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818

Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J.M. (2006). Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance. Science, 312: 431-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123412

Bascompte, J. (2010). Structure and dynamics of ecological networks: Understanding the architecture of species relationships may help predict how ecosystems respond to change. Science, 329: 765-766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194255

Bentley, B. (1977). The protective function of ants visiting the extrafloral nectaries of Bixa orellana (Bixaceae). The Journal of Ecology, 65: 27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2259060

Blüthgen, N. (2010). Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist’s guide. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 185-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.01.001

Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Blüthgen, N. (2006). Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6: 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9

Boucher, D.H., James, S. & Keeler, K.H. (1982). The Ecology of Mutualism. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 13: 315-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001531

Burgos, E., Ceva, H., Perazzo, R.P.J., Devoto, M., Medan, D., Zimmermann, M. & María Delbue, A. (2007). Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249: 307-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.030

Dáttilo, W., Aguirre, A., Flores-Flores, R. V., Fagundes, R., Lange, D., García-Chávez, J., Del-Claro, K. & Rico-Gray, V. (2015). Secretory activity of extrafloral nectaries shaping multitrophic ant-plant-herbivore interactions in an arid environment. Journal of Arid Environments, 114: 104-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.12.001

Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014a). Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant-plant networks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113: 405-414.

Dáttilo, W., Fagundes, R., Gurka, C.A.Q., Silva, M.S.A., Vieira, M.C.L., Izzo, T.J., Díaz-Castelazo, C., Del-Claro, K. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014b). Individual-based ant-plant networks: Diurnal-nocturnal structure and species-area relationship. PLoS ONE, 9: e99838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099838

Dáttilo, W., Sánchez-Galván, I., Lange, D., Del-Claro, K. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014c). Importance of interaction frequency in analysis of ant-plant networks in tropical environments. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 30: 165-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467413000813

Dattilo, W. (2015). Mutualistic networks by Jordi Bascompte and Pedro Jordano. Journal of Complex Networks, 3: 158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnu021

Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. (2014). Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant-plant networks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113: 405-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12350

Del-Claro, K., Johnson, M. & Torezan-Silingardi, H.M. (2012). Plant-arthropod interactions: A behavioral approach. Psyche, 2012: 203208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/203208

Euler, L. & Euler, L. (1736). Solutio problematis ad geometrian situs pertinentis. Comentarii academiae scientarum Petropolitanae, 8: ID 128-140.

Fagundes, R., Del-Claro, K. & Ribeiro, S.P. (2012). Effects of the trophobiont herbivore Calloconophora pugionata (Hemiptera) on ant fauna associated with Myrcia obovata (Myrtaceae) in a montane tropical forest. Psyche, 2012: ID 783945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/783945

Fahn, A. (1988). Secretory tissues in vascular plants. New Phytologist, 108: 229-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb04159.x

Falcão, J.C.F., Dáttilo, W. & Izzo, T.J. (2013). Temporal variation in extrafloral nectar secretion in different ontogenic stages of the fruits of Alibertia verrucosa S. Moore (Rubiaceae) in a Neotropical savanna. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9: 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2013.782513

Giulietti, A.M., Pirani, J.R. & Harley, R.M. (1997). Espinhaço Range region, eastern Brazil. In S.D. Davis, V.H. Heywood, O. Herrera-MacBryde, J. Villa-Lobos & A.C. Hamilton, eds. Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. Information Press, Oxford, v. 3, p. 397-404.

Gove, A.D., Majer, J.D. & Dunn, R.R. (2007). A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in a “ di V use ” mutualism. Oecologia, 153: 687-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0756-5

Grover, C.D., Kay, A.D., Monson, J.A., Marsh, T.C. & Holway, D.A. (2007). Linking nutrition and behavioural dominance: carbohydrate scarcity limits aggression and activity in Argentine ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 274: 2951-2957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1065

Guimarães, P.R., Machado, G., de Aguiar, M.A.M., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., Pinheiro, A. & dos Reis, S.F. (2007a). Build-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249: 181-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.004

Guimarães, P.R., Rico-Gray, V., dos Reis, S.F. & Thompson, J.N. (2006). Asymmetries in specialization in ant-plant mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 273: 2041-2047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3548

Guimarães, P.R., Sazima, C., dos Reis, S.F. & Sazima, I. (2007b). The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees? Biology Letters, 3: 51-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0562

Guimerà, R., Sales-Pardo, M. & Amaral, L.A.N. (2004) .Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70: 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.025101

Heil, M., Barajas-Barron, A., Orona-Tamayo, D., Wielsch, N. & Svatos, A. (2014). Partner manipulation stabilises a horizontally transmitted mutualism. Ecology Letters, 17: 185-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12215

Herbert G . Baker, P.A.. O. and I.B. (1978). A comparison of the amino acid complements of floral and extrafloral nectars. Botanical Gazette, 139: 322-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/337008

Jordano, P. (1987). Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution. American Naturalist, 129: 657-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/284665

Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Olesen, M.J. (2003). Invariant Properties in Coevolutionary Networks of Plant-Animal Interactions. Ecology Letters, 6: 69-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00403.x

Morisita, M. (1962). Iσ-index a measure of dispersion of individuals? Population Ecology, 4: 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533903

Kaplan, I., Eubanks, M.D., Kaplan, I.A.N. & Eubanks, M.D. (2015). Aphids Alter the Community-Wide Impact of Fire Ants, 86: 1640-1649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0016

Lewinsohn, T.M., Ina, P. & Prado, P.I. (2006a). Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos, 113: 1-11.

Lewinsohn, T.M., Inácio Prado, P., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Olesen, J.M. (2006b). Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos, 113: 174-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14583.x

Marquitti, F.M.D., Guimarães, P.R., Pires, M.M. & Bittencourt, L.F. (2014). MODULAR: Software for the autonomous computation of modularity in large network sets. Ecography, 37: 221-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00506.x

Millán-Cañongo, C., Orona-Tamayo, D. & Heil, M. (2014). Phloem Sugar Flux and Jasmonic Acid-Responsive Cell Wall Invertase Control Extrafloral Nectar Secretion in Ricinus communis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 40: 760-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0476-3

Miller, T.E.X. (2007). Does having multiple partners weaken the benefits of facultative mutualism? A test with cacti and cactus-tending ants. Oikos, 116: 500-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15317.x

Olesen, J.M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y.L. & Jordano, P. (2007). The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 19891-19896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706375104

Oliveira, P.S., Rico-Gray, V., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Castillo-Guevara, C. (1999). Interaction between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical coastal sand dunes: Herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology, 13: 623-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00360.x

Pires, M.M., Guimarães, P.R., Araújo, M.S., Giaretta, A.A., Costa, J.C.L. & dos Reis, S.F. (2011). The nested assembly of individual-resource networks. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80: 896-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01818.x

Retana, J. & Cerda, X. (2000). Patterns of diversity and composition of Mediterranean ground ant communities tracking spatial and temporal variability in the thermal environment. Oecologia, 123: 436-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420051031

Schmid, R. (1988). Reproductive versus extra-reproductive nectaries-historical perspective and terminological recom-mendations. The Botanical Review, 54: 179-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858528

Vasconcelos, M.F. de. (2011). O que são campos rupestres e campos de altitude nos topos de montanha do leste do Brasil? Brazilian Journal of Botany, 34: 241-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042011000200012

Wallace, A. R. 1889. Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. London & New York: Macmillan & Co. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.2472

Wilder, S.M. & Eubanks, M.D. (2010). Extrafloral nectar content alters foraging preferences of a predatory ant. Biology Letters, 6: 177-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0736

Downloads

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

Schramm Júnior, J. E., Oliveira, G. S., Santos, T. B., & Santos, G. M. de M. (2023). Ants Sleep, Plants do not: The Variation in Species’ Activity Influences the Topology of Interaction Networks. Sociobiology, 70(4), e9283. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v70i4.9283

Issue

Section

Research Article - Ants

Most read articles by the same author(s)