REGIMES REPRESENTATIVOS DA MODERNIDADE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/lm.v1i1.1672Abstract
Trata de um estudo da relação entre texto e imagem, entre a representação visual e a literatura, como abordagem fértil para a compreensão da literatura numa sociedade cada vez mais dominada pela dinâmica da “cultura da imagem.
Downloads
References
Arnheim, R. (1969) Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Arnheim, R. (1986) New essays on the psychology of art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1976) L’echange symbolique et la mort . Paris: Gallimard.
Bataille, G. (1987). Æuvres complètes, Vol. X. Paris: Gallimard.
Baxandall, M. (1995) Shadows and enlightenmentt. New Haven: Yale UP.
Benjamin, W. (1993). Magia e técnica, arte e política. São Paulo: editora brasiliense.
Benjamin, W. (1991). Gesammelte Schriften, (VII vol.) Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp-Tashenbuch-
Wissenschaft.
Berg, W. J. (1992). The visual novel: Emile Zola and the art of his times. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania
State UP.
Bermingham, A. & John Brewer (red) (1995)The consumption of culture, 1600-1800: image, object, text.
London: Routledge.
Bryson, N. (1983). Vision and Painting: The logic of the gaze. New Haven: Yale UP.
Bryson, N. (1990). Looking at the overlooked. London: Harvard UP.
Bryson, N. (1981) Word and Image. Cambridge UP.
Bryson, N., M.A. Holly & K. Moxey (1994). Visual culture - images and interpretation. Hanover &
London: Wesleyan UP.
Caws, M.A. (1981). The Eye in the Text. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Caws, M.A. (1989). The art of interference. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Cohen, Tom (1994). Anti-Mimesis: From Plato to Hitchcock. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Crary, J. (1993). Techniques of the observer - On vision And modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge
& London: MIT Press.
Crowter, P. (1993). Critical aesthetics and Post-modernism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Debord, G. (1967). La société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet-Chastel.
Debord, G. (1988). Commentaire sur la société du spectacle. Paris: Gerard Lepovici. Dyer, R. (1993). The
Matter of Images. London & New York: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel (1987). As Palavras e as Coisas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Foucault, Michel (1989). Isto não é um cachimbo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Foster, H. (ed.) (1988). Vision and visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.
(1996) The Return of the Real. Cambridge, London: October.
Freedberg, D. (1989). The power of images. Chicago: Chicago UP.
Fried M. (1988) Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Cambridge,
London: October
Goodman, Nelson (1976). Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis:
Hackett.
Gombrich, Ernst (1960). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psycology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton:
Princeton UP.
Greenberg, C. (1940) “Towards a Newer Laocoon”. Partisan Review 7 (july-august), 296-310.
Grupe u. (1992). Traité du signe visuel. Paris: Seuil.
Harrison, Ch. (org) (1993). Art in theory 1900-1990. Oxford: Blackwell.
Iser, W. (1993) The fictive and the imaginary. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins UP.
Jameson, Fredric (1994). Espaço e imagem. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. UFRJ.
Jameson, Fredric (1991) Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.
Jay, M. (1988) “Scopic regimes of modernity” in Foster. H.(ed.) Vision and Visuality. Bay Prees Seattle.
Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University og California Press.
Krauss, Rosalind E. (1993). The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge,
Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.
Krieger, Murray (org.)(1993). The Aims of Representation. Stanford, California: Stanford UP.
LaCapra, Dominick (1985). History and Criticism. Ithaca & London: Cornell UP.
Lavin, I. (1995) Meaning in the visual arts: views from the outside: a centennial commemoration of Erwin
Panofsky (1892-1968). Princeton, NJ: Institute for Advanced Study, 1995.
Levin, D.M. (ed.) (1993). Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University og
California Press.
Lévy, P. (1993). As tecnologias da inteligência. Rio de Janeiro: editora 34.
Lyotard, Jean-François (1979). Discurso, Figura. Barcelona: Ed. Gustavo Gili.
Stéphane Mallarmé (1945). “Sur le livré illustré”, Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Ed. Henri Mondor.
Man, P. de (1971). Blindness and insigth - Essays in contemporary criticism. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Melberg, Arne (1995). Theories of Mimesis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Melville, S. & B. Readings (1995). Vision and textuality. Durham: Duke UP.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Signes. Paris: Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1971). O visível e o invisível. São Paulo: Perspectiva
Miller,J. Hillis (1994). Illustration. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1995) Picture theory. Chicago & London. Chicago UP.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1986). Iconology - Image, text, ideology. Chicago & London: Chicago UP.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (ed.) (1974). The language of images. Chicago and London: Chicago UP.
Mitchell W.J.T. (1980). “Spatial form in literature – Towards a general theory” Critical Inquiry 6 , 539.
Monegal, A. (1993). Luis Buñuel de la literatura al cine - Una poética del objeto. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Moxey, Keith (1994). The Practice of Theory. Ithaca & London: Cornell UP.
Murray. R. (1992). Changing perspectives in literature and the visuel arts 1650-1820. New Jersey: Princeton
UP.
Parente, A. (org.) (1993). Imagem máquina. Rio de Janeiro: editora 34.
Perniola, M. (1994) O Momento Egípcio na Sociedade e na Arte. Trad. Catia Benedetti. Lisboa: Bertrand.
Praz , M. (1970) Mnemosyne-The Parallel between Literature and the Visual Arts. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Rosen P.(ed.)(1986). Narrative Apparatus & Ideology. New York: Columbia, UP
Sennet, R. (1990). The conscience of the eye. London: Faber & Faber.
Schaeffer, J-M. (1987). L‘image précaire. Paris: Seuil.
Schaeffer, J-M. (1992). L‘art de l‘âge moderne. Paris: Gallimard.
Silverman, K. (1996). The threshold of the visible world. New York & London: Routledge.
Solso, R. L.(1994) Cognition and the visual arts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Stam R.; (1992). Reflexivity in film and literature. New York: Columbia UP Schøllhammer, Karl Erik
(1995a). “Sankt Antonius Fristelser – en dialog mellem en fortælling og et maleri” (As Tentações
de Santo António – um diálogo entre um conto e um cuadro) Tidskriftet Kritik, no. 116. København:
Gyldendals Forlag.
Schøllhammer, Karl Erik (1995b) “Leitura e imagem – fundamentos para um diálogo” Cadernos da VI
Jornada Nacional da Literatura. Passo Fundo: Universidade de Passo Fundo (prelo).
Schøllhammer, Karl Erik (1995c) “La passión por lo imperfecto” in Las Passiones - Encuentro Internacional
sobre las passiones. Centro de Estúdios Interdiciplinares (CEI) de la Universidad Nacional de
Rosário. 17 a 20 de octubro. Rosário-Argentina. Ediciones Universidade de Rosário. (prelo).
Schøllhammer, Karl Erik (1994a) “Video ergo sum; reflexões sobre cultura visual e modernidade” in
Caderno de Memória Cultural, v. 1, no. 1. Oct. 94- março 95. p. 69-77. Rio de Janeiro: Museu da Republica.
Schøllhammer, Karl Erik (1994b) “O cenário do ambíguo: Traços barrocos na prosa moderna” in Sociedade
e Estado, Vol. VIII n. 1-2. Jan-dec. p.85-107. Brasília: Relume Dumará/Ed.
Schøllhammer, Karl Erik (1994c) “Det barokke og det neo-barokke” in Pré-publication, n. 141. p. 2-32. Århus
– Dinamarca: Romansk Institut.
Schøllhammer, Karl Erik (1994d) “Batailles billeder” (As imagens de George Bataille) in Sørensen, Asger
(red.). Excesser. Århus: Forlaget Modtryk. p. 161-178. 1994.
Tye, M. (1991). The imagery debate. London: MIT.
Updike, J. (1989) Just looking: essays on art. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wellek, R. & Warren, A, (1971) Teoria da literatura. (tradução de Jose Palla e Carmo) Lisboa: Publicações
Europa-America,.
Xavier, I. (1983) (org.). A experiência do Cinema. Rio de Janeiro: Edições do Graal/Embrafilme.
