Ant Community in Neotropical Agrosystems: A Four-Year Study in Conventional and No-Tillage Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i2.1204Keywords:
Agrosystem, Biodiversity, Community structure, Soil useAbstract
Studies comparing agricultural practices that maintain a better quality and a healthy soil fauna consider the no-tillage farming as the most effective practice when compared to other planting techniques. In order to evaluate the influence of the no-tillage and conventional tillage methods (with and without manipulation of the soil before planting, respectively) on ant communities, we monitored two areas with these two types of practice (conventional and no-tillage) over the period of four years. We collected ants once per month along 10 transects randomly distributed using three pitfall traps in each area. In addition, we collected the dead plant biomass present at each point sampled as a parameter for measuring the environmental complexity of the areas. In total, we captured 27,480 individuals belonging to 26 species in the no-tillage area and 24,570 individuals belonging to 24 species in the conventional tillage area. The generalised linear model analysis showed that the no-tillage system had the highest abundance of individuals, as well as richness and diversity of species, during most of the study period, as compared to conventional tillage areas. We also found a significant positive correlation between species richness and dead plant biomass. Thus, it is possible to infer that the no-tillage area is a more complex environment with a greater diversity of ants and, therefore, a more sustainable agrosystem as compared to conventional tillage areas.Downloads
References
Agarwal, V.M., Rastogi, N.S. & Raju, V.S. (2007). Impact of predatory ants on two lepidopteran insect pests in Indian cauliflower agroecosystems. Journal of Applied Entomology, 131: 493-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01197.x
Agosti, D., Schultz, T. & Majer, J.D. (2000). Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 280 p.
Ashford, O.S., Foster, W.A., Turner, B.L., Sayer, E.J., Sutcliffe, L. & Tanner, E.V.J. (2013). Litter manipulation and the soil arthropod community in a lowland tropical rainforest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 62: 5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.001
Behan-Pelletier, V.M. (1999). Oribatid mite biodiversity in agroecosystems: role for bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74: 411-423.
Bohac, J.(1999). Staphylinid beetles as bioindicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74: 357-372.
Bolton, B., Alpert, G., Ward, P. S., & Naskrecki, P. (2006). Bolton’s catalogue of ants of the world: 1758-2005. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 222 p.
Booij, C.J.H. & Noorlander, J.(1992). Farming systems and insect predators. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 40: 125-135.
Büchs, W. (2003). Biodiversity and agri-environmental indicators-general scopes and skills with special reference to the habitat level. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98: 35-78. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00070-7
Castro, A.C. & Queiroz, M.V.B. (1987). Estrutura e organização de uma comunidade de formigas em agroecossistema neotropical. Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 16: 363-375.
Christiaans, T., Eichner, T. & Pethig, R. (2007). Optimal pest control in agriculture. Journal of Economic Dynamivs and Control, 31: 3965-3985. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2007.01.028
Cividanes, F.J. & Yamamoto, F.T. (2002). Pragas e inimigos naturais na soja e no milho cultivados em sistemas diversificados. Scientia Agricola, 59: 683-687. doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162002000400010
de la Fuente, M.A.S.& Marquis, R.J. (1999). The role of ant-tended extrafloral nectaries in the protection and benefit of a Neotropical rainforest tree. Oecologia, 118: 192-202. doi: 10.1007/s004420050718
Dáttilo, W. & Izzo, T.J. (2012). Temperature influence on species co-occurrence patterns in treefall gap and dense forest ant communities in a terra-firme forest of Central Amazon, Brazil. Sociobiology, 59: 351-367. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v59i2.599
Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F. & Stewart, B.A.(1994). Faunal indicators of soil quality.In J.W.Doran, D.C.Coleman, D.F.Bezdicek & B.A. Stewart (Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy (pp. 91-106). Madison: Guilford Rd.
EMBRAPA (1999). Empresa brasileira de pesquisa agropecuária. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos, Embrapa, Brasília.
Falcão, J.C.F., Dáttilo, W. & Izzo, T.J. (2015). Efficiency of different planted forests in recovering biodiversity and ecological interactions in Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 339: 105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.007
Fernandes, W.D., Oliveira, P.S., Carvalho, S.L. & Habib, M.E.M. (1994). Pheidole ants as potential biological control agents of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in southeast Brazil. Journal of Applied Entomology, 118: 437-441. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1994.tb00822.x
Fernandes, W.D., Sant’Ana, M.V., Raizer, J. & Lange, D. (2012). Predation of fruit fly larvae Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) by ants in grove. Psyche ID 108389, 7 pages. doi: 10.1155/2012/108389
French, B.W., Elliott, N.C. & Berberet, R.C. (1998). Reverting conservation reserve program lands to wheat and livestock production: effects on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages. Environmental Entomology, 27: 1323-1335. doi: 10.1093/ee/27.6.1323
Harvey, C.T. & Eubanks, M.D. (2004). Effect of habitat complexity on biological control by the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in collards. Biological Control, 29: 348-358. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.08.006
Hawksworth, D.L. (1991). The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: Its role in sustainable agriculture.Melksham: CAB International, Redwood Press,302 p.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O.(1990). The Ants.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p.
Hooper, D.U., Chapin, F.S., Ewel, J.J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J.H., Lodge, D.M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Setälä, H., Symstad, A.J., Vandermeer, J. & Wardle, D.A. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75: 3-35. doi: 10.1890/04-0922
Isselstein, J., Stippich, G. & Wahmhoff, W. (1991). Umweltwirkungen von Extensivierun gsmaûnahmen im Ackerbau - EineUÈ bersicht. Berichte über Landw, 69: 379-413.
Kaspari, M., Alonso, L. & O’Donnellkwd, S. (2000). Three energy variables predict ant abundance at a geographical scale. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 267: 485-489. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1026
Khoo, K.C. & Ho, C.T.(1992). The influence of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on losses due to Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae), black pod disease, and mammalian pests in cocoa in Malaysia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 82: 485-491.
Kladivko, E.J.(2001). Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil Tillage Research, 61: 61-76. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00179-9
Lach, L., Parr, C.L. & Abott, K.L. (2009). Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 432 p.
Lange, D., Fernandes, W.D., Raizer, J. & Faccenda, O. (2008). Predacious activity of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in conventional and in no-till agriculture systems. Brazilian archives of Biology and Technology, 51: 1199-1207. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132008000600015
Lassau, S.A.& Hochuli, D.F. (2004). Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography, 27: 157-164. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03675.x
Longino, J.I., Coddington, J.A. & Colwell, R.K. (2002). The ant fauna of a tropical rainforest: Estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology, 83: 689-702. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0689:TAFOAT]2.0.CO;2
Mansfield, S., Elias, N.V. & Lytton-Hitchins, J.A. (2003). Ants as egg predators of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australian cotton crops. Australian Journal of Entomology, 42: 349-351. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.2003.00367.x
Martin, L.J., Blossey, B.& Ellis, E. (2012). Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 10: 195-201. doi: 10.1890/110154
Mas, M.T. & Verdú, A. (2003). Tillage system effects on weed communities in a 4-year crop rotation under Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil Tillage Research, 74: 15-24. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00079-5
McCune, B. & Mefford, M.J. (2006). PC-ORD, version 5.0. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Gleneden Beach, MjM Solfware Desing.
McLaughlin, A. & Mineau, P. (1995). The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 55: 201-212. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(95)00609-V
Naeem, S. & Li, S. (1998). Consumer species richness and autotrophic biomass. Ecology, 79: 2603-2615. doi: 10.1890/ 0012-9658(1998)079[2603:CSRAAB]2.0.CO;2
Perfecto, I.(1991). Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as natural control agents of pests in irrigated maize in Nicaragua. Journal of Economic Entomology, 84: 65-70. doi: /10.1093/jee/84.1.65
Philpott, S.M. & Armbrecht, I.(2006). Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function. Ecological Entomology, 31: 369-377. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2311.2006.00793.x
Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M.(2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x
Rico-Gray, V. & Oliveira, P.S. (2007). The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 331 p.
Sani, B. (2011). Till-system management (TSM) for achieve to the sustainable agriculture in field of soybean (Glycine max L.) at Iran. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 76: 628-632.
Schmitz, O.J., Hambäck, P.A. & Beckerman, A.P.(2000). Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. American Naturalist, 155: 141-153. doi: 10.1086/303311
Schmitz, O.J. & Suttle, K.B.(2001). Effects of top predator species on direct and indirect interactions in a food web. Ecology, 82: 2072-2081. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2072:EOTPSO]2.0.CO;2
Silvestre, R.C.R.F., Brandão, C.R.F. & Silva, R.R. (2003). Grupos funcionales de hormigas: el caso de los gremios del cerrado.In: F Fernandez (Ed.) Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical (pp. 113-148). Bogotá: Instituto de investigación de recursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
Sharley, D.J., Hoffmann, A.A. & Thomson, L.J. (2008). The effects of soil tillage on beneficial invertebrates within the vineyard. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10: 233-243. doi: 10.1111/j. 1461-9563.2008.00376.x
Stinner, B.R. & House, G.J. (1990). Arthropods and other invertebrates in conservation-tillage agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 35: 299-318.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418: 671-677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014
Treonis, A.M., Austin, E.E., Buyer, J.S., Maul, J.E., Spicer, L. & Zasada, I.A. (2010). Effects of organic amendment and tillage on soil microorganisms and microfauna. Applied Soil Ecology, 46: 103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.06.017
Urrutia-Escobar, M.X. & Armbrecht, I. (2013). Effect of two agroecological management strategies on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) diversity on coffee plantations in southwestern Colombia. Environmental Entomology, 42: 194-203. doi: 10.1603/EN11084
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
