Effects of Habitat Amount and Configuration on Ant Functional Traits in a Neotropical Rainforest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v73i3.12407Keywords:
Edge Effect, Formicidae, habitat loss, fragmentation, Atlantic ForestAbstract
Habitat loss and fragmentation are synergetic drivers reshaping and threatening biodiversity. Although several studies have evaluated the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on species diversity, understanding how functional traits are linked to these responses is a relatively recent approach. Ants are fundamental components of different ecosystems, especially in tropical forests where they are dominant. We analyze how functional traits of ants respond to forest cover loss and the increasing edge density in 20 forest sites in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. We found a strong relationship between functional traits and both predictors. Specifically, forest fragments embedded in landscapes with higher edge density (i.e., a higher total length of habitat edges per unit area) showed ants with larger appendages (legs, antennal scape) and larger clypeus than those in landscapes with lower edge density. In addition, forest amount and the overall anthropic characteristics of the landscapes jointly affected ant species with larger mandibles. Altogether, our study identified a set of morphological traits correlated with the higher vulnerability of ant species to changes in landscape structure. Implications for insect conservation: we have seen that species with smaller clypeus, leg, and antennal scape are more susceptible to edge effects. Identifying the key species’ attributes making them more susceptible to the impacts of habitat loss and edge effects will help to set more precise conservation goals for vulnerable ecosystems such as tropical rainforests. Keywords: Edge effects, Formicidae, fragmentation, habitat loss.
Downloads
References
Arnan, X., Cerdá, X., Rodrigo, A. & Retana, J. (2013). Response of ant functional composition to fire. Ecography, 36: 1182-1192.
Benchimol, M., Mariano-Neto, E., Faria, D. Rocha-Santos, L., de Souza Pessoa, M., Gomes, F. S., Talora, D.C. & Cazetta, E. (2017). Translating plant community responses to habitat loss into conservation practices: Forest cover matters. Biological Conservation, 209: 499-507.
Bentley, B.L. (1976). Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: Interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology, 57: 815-820.
Bishop, T.R., Robertson, M.P., van Rensburg, B.J. & Parr, C.L. (2015). Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages. Journal of Biogeography, 42: 1776-1786.
Blüthgen, N., Stork, N.E. & Fiedler, K. (2004). Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: Honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos, 106: 344-358.
Bolker, B. (2013). bbmle: Tools for General Maximum Likelihood Estimation. R package version 1.0.25.1.
Bolton, B. (2003). Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Gainesville: American Entomological Institute.
Bolton, B. (2016). New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World, and Synopsis of Taxonomic Publications on Formicidae.
Breheny, P. & Burchett, W. (2017). Visualization of regression models using visreg. The R Journal, 9: 56-71.
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
Caitano, B., Chaves, T.P., Dodonov, P. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2020). Edge effects on insects depend on life history traits: A global meta-analysis. Journal of Insect Conservation, 4: 233-240.
Cianciaruso, M.V., Silva, I.A. & Batalha, M.A. (2009). Diversidades filogenética e funcional: Novas abordagens para a ecologia de comunidades. Oecologia Brasiliensis, 9: 93-103.
Cleary, D.F.R., Boyle, T.J.B., Setyawati, T. et al. (2007). Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. Ecological Applications, 17: 1184-1197.
Cooper, R. & Whitmore, R.C. (1990). Arthropod sampling methods in ornithology. In D.M. Power (Ed.), Current Ornithology. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 29-37.
Coretta, S. (2020). tidymv: Tidy Model Visualisation for Generalised Additive Models. R package version 3.0.0. Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidymv
Davidson, D.W., Cook, S.C. & Snelling, R.R. (2004). Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): Ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia, 139: 255-266.
Del Toro, I., Ribbons, R.R. & Pelini, S.L. (2012). The little things that run the world revisited: A review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 17: 133-146.
Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.S.F. & Majer, J.D. (2015). As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil: Introduction: the poneromorph ants of Brazil. In J.H.C. Delabie, R.M. Feitosa & J.D. Majer (Eds.), As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil. Ilhéus: Editus. pp. 447-462.
Dias, N.S., Zanetti, R., Santos, M.S. et al. (2008). Interação de fragmentos florestais com agroecossistemas adjacentes de café e pastagem: Respostas das comunidades de formigas (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Iheringia Série Zoologia, 98: 136-142.
Fahrig, L. (2013). Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: The habitat amount hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography, 40: 1649-1663.
Fasiolo, M., Nedellec, R. & Wood, S.N. (2018). mgcViz: Visualizations for generalized additive models. R package.
Fichaux, M., Béchade, B., Donald, J. et al. (2019). Habitats shape taxonomic and functional composition of Neotropical ant assemblages. Oecologia, 189: 501-513.
Fichaux, M., Vleminckx, J., Courtois, E.A. et al. (2020). Environmental determinants of leaf litter ant community composition along an elevational gradient. Biotropica, 53: 97-109.
Fittkau, E.J. & Klinge, H. (1973). On biomass and trophic structure of the Central Amazonian rain forest ecosystem. Biotropica, 5: 2-14.
Fletcher, R.J. Jr., Didham, R.K., Banks-Leite, C. et al. (2018). Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 226: 9-15.
Fowler, H.G., Forti, L.C., Brandão, C.R.F. & Delabie, J.H.C. (1991). Ecologia nutricional de formigas. In A.R. Panizzi & J.R.P. Parra (Eds.), Ecologia nutricional de insetos e suas implicações no manejo de pragas. São Paulo: Manole. pp. 131-223.
Gibb, H., Stoklosa, J., Warton, D.I. et al. (2014). Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages? Oecologia, 177: 519-531.
Guilherme, D.R., Souza, J.L.P., Franklin, E. et al. (2019). Can environmental complexity predict functional trait composition of ground-dwelling ant assemblages? A test across the Amazon Basin. Acta Oecologica, 99: 103434.
Hanski, I. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and species richness. Journal of Biogeography, 42: 989-993.
Harper, K.A., Macdonald, S.E., Burton, P.J. et al. (2005). Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology, 19: 768-782.
Huais, P.Y. (2018). multifit: An R function for multi-scale analysis in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 33: 1023-1028.
Hurlbert, A.H., Ballantyne, I.V.F. & Powell, S. (2008). Shaking a leg and hot to trot: The effects of body size and temperature on running speed in ants. Ecological Entomology, 33: 144-154.
Jaffe, K. (1993). Surfing ants. Florida Entomologist, 76: 182-183.
Kaspari, M. (1993). Body size and microclimate use in Neotropical granivorous ants. Oecologia, 96: 500-507.
Kaspari, M. & Weiser, M.D. (1999). The size-grain hypothesis and interspecific scaling in ants. Functional Ecology, 13: 530-538.
Kotze, J. & O’Hara, R.B. (2003). Species decline – but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia, 135: 138-148.
Laurance, W.F. (2007). Have we overstated the tropical biodiversity crisis? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22: 65-70.
Laurance, W.F., Sayer, J. & Cassman, K.G. (2014). Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29: 107-116.
Leal, I.R., Filgueiras, B.K.C., Gomes, J.P. et al. (2012). Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21: 1687-1701.
Leong, C.M., Wang, R., Cheung, S.C. et al. (2022). Are thermal constraints shaping foraging ant assemblages in tropical regions? Integrating thermal and morphological traits to understand consequences of land-use transformation. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 16: 254–265.
Lindell, C.A., Riffel, S.K., Kaiser, S.A. et al. (2007). Edge responses of tropical and temperate birds. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 119: 205-220.
Manhães, M.A. & Dias, M.M. (2011). Spatial dynamics of understorey insectivorous birds and arthropods in a southeastern Brazilian Atlantic woodlot. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 71: 1-7.
McGarigal, K. & Marks, B.J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Morante-Filho, J.C., Arroyo-Rodriguez, V. & Faria, D. (2016). Patterns and predictors of β-diversity in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest: A multiscale analysis of forest specialist and generalist birds. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85: 240-250.
Morante-Filho, J.C., Benchimol, M. & Faria, D. (2020). Landscape composition is the strongest determinant of bird occupancy patterns in tropical forest patches. Landscape Ecology, 36: 105-117.
Mouchet, M.A., Villéger, S., Mason, N.W.H. & Mouillot, D. (2010). Functional diversity measures: An overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecology, 24: 867-876.
Murcia, C. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: Implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 58-62.
Nooten, S.S., Schultheiss, P., Rowe, R.C. et al. (2019). Habitat complexity affects functional traits and diversity of ant assemblages in urban green spaces (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 29: 67-77.
Pereyra, M., Pol, R.G. & Galetto, L. (2015). Does edge effect and patch size affect the interaction between ants and Croton lachnostachyus in fragmented landscapes of Chaco forest? Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 9: 175-186.
Püttker, T., Crouzeilles, R., Almeida-Gomes, M. et al. (2020). Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species. Biological Conservation, 241: 108368.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from: https://www.r-project.org/
Rainio, J. & Niemela, J. (2003). Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 487-506.
Ries, L., Fletcher, R.J. Jr., Battin, J. & Sisk, T.D. (2004). Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35: 491-522.
Rocha-Santos, L., Pessoa, M.S., Cassano, C.R. et al. (2016). The shrinkage of a forest: Landscape-scale deforestation leading to overall changes in local forest structure. Biological Conservation, 196: 1-9.
Rodrigues, P.J. & Nascimento, M.T. (2006). Fragmentação florestal: Breves considerações teóricas sobre efeitos de borda. Rodriguésia, 57: 63-74.
Sanabria, C., Barot, S., Fonte, S.J. & Dubs, F. (2022). Do morphological traits of ground-dwelling ants respond to land use changes in a neotropical landscape? Geoderma, 418: 115841.
Silva, R.R. & Brandão, C.R.F. (1999). Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) como indicadores da qualidade ambiental e da biodiversidade de outros invertebrados terrestres. Biotemas, 12: 55-73.
Silvestre, R., Brandão, C.R.F. & Silva, R.R. (2003). Grupos funcionales de hormigas: El caso de los gremios del Cerrado. In F. Fernández (Ed.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. pp. 113-148.
Sommer, S. & Wehner, R. (2012). Leg allometry in ants: Extreme long-leggedness in thermophilic species. Arthropod Structure and Development, 41: 71-77.
Thier, O. & Wesenberg, J. (2016). Floristic composition and edge-induced homogenization in tree communities in the fragmented Atlantic rainforest of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Tropical Conservation Science, 9: 852-876.
Thomas, W.W., De Carvalho, A.M.V., Amorim, A.M.A. et al. (1998). Plant endemism in two forests in southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7: 311-322.
Tischendorf, L. & Fahrig, L. (2000). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90: 7-19.
Turner, I.M. (1996). Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: A review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 200-209.
Vasconcelos, H.L., Neves, K.C., Vieira, J. et al. (2024). Land-use intensification has extensive effects on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of Neotropical ant communities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 33: 2487-2502.
Van Oudenhove, L., Billoir, E., Boulay, R. et al. (2011). Temperature limits trail following behaviour through pheromone decay in ants. Naturwissenschaften, 98: 1009-1017.
Weiser, M.D. & Kaspari, M. (2006). Ecological morphospace of New World ants. Ecological Entomology, 31: 131-142.
Wood, S.N. (2008). Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 70: 495-518.
Wood, S.N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Wood, S. & Scheipl, F. (2017). gamm4: Generalized additive mixed models using “mgcv” and “lme4”. R package version 0.2-5.
Yates, M.L., Andrew, N.R., Binns, M. & Gibb, H. (2014). Morphological traits: Predictable responses to macrohabitats across a 300 km scale. PeerJ, 2: e271.
Zhang, X., Lu, Z.X., Zhang, N.N. & Chen, Y.Q. (2022). Data of ant community compositions and functional traits responding to land-use change at the local scale. Biodiversity Data Journal, 10: e85119.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bianca Caitano, Pavel Dodonov, Icaro Menezes, Deborah Faria, Jacques Hubert Charles Delabie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

eISSN 2447-8067









