Seasonal cycle of the nest composition in the Ponerine ant Cryptopone sauteri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v64i4.1853Keywords:
life history, nuptial flight, polydomy, unmated queensAbstract
The annual life history is a basic and important factor in ecological studies on temperate ant species. The biology of Ponerinae species has been studied for many species, but little attention has been paid to their life history. Cryptopone sauteri is one of the most common ants in temperate regions of Japan. However, there is no quantitative information on the life history of this species. We report seasonal changes in brood development, the emergence of reproductives and social structures of C. sauteri. Additionally, we discuss that this species possibly exhibits a polydomous nesting system.
Downloads
References
Banschbach, V.S. & Herbers, J.M. (1996). Complex colony structure in social insects 2. Reproduction, queen-worker conflict, and levels of selection. Evolution, 50: 298–307. doi:10.1111/j.1558- 5646.1996.tb04493.x.
Bharti, H. & Wachkoo, A.A. (2013). Cryptopone subterranea sp. nov., a rare new cryptobiotic ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from India. Asian Myrmecology, 5: 1–4.
Bourke, A.F.G. & Franks, N.R. (1995). Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. pp. 299-326.
Debout, G., Schatz, B., Elias, M. & Mckey, D. (2007). Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90: 319–348. doi:10.1111/j. 1095-8312.2007.00728.x.
Denis, D., Orivel, J., Hora, R., Chameron, S. & Fresneau, D. (2006). First record of polydomy in a monogynous ponerine ant: a means to allow emigration between Pachycondyla goeldii nests. Journal of Insect Behavior, 19: 279–291. doi: 10.1007/s10905-006-9024-5.
Gotoh, A. & Ito, F. (2008). Seasonal cycle of colony structure in the Ponerine ant Pachycondyla chinensisin western Japan (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux, 55: 98–104. doi:10.1007/s00040-007-0977-y.
Hart, L.M. & Tschinkel, W.R. (2012). A seasonal natural history of the ant, Odontomachus brunneus. Insectes Sociaux, 59: 45–54. doi:10.1007/ s00040-011-0186-6.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p.
Katzerke, A., Neumann, P., Pirk, C.W.W., Bliss, P. & Moritz, R.F.A. (2006). Seasonal nestmate recognition in the ant Formica exsecta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61: 143–150. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0245-6.
Lanan, M.C., Dornhaus, A. & Bronstein, J.L. (2011). The function of polydomy: the ant Crematogaster torosa preferentially forms new nests near food sources and fortifies outstations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65: 959–968. doi: 10.1 007/S00265-0 10-1 096-8.
Monnin, T. & Peeters, C. (2008). How many gamergates is an ant queen worth? Naturwissenschaften, 95: 109-116. Doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0297-0.
Murata, K. (1994). Life history of Cryptopone sauteri WHEELER. Ari, 17: 3.
Murata, N., Tsuji, K. & Kikuchi, T. (2016). Social structure and nestmate discrimination in two species of Brachyponera ants distributed in Japan. Entomological Science, 20: 86-95. doi: 10.1111/ens.12232.
Oliveira, P.S., Camargo, R.X. & Fourcassié, V. (2011). Nesting patterns, ecological correlates of polygyny and social organization in the neotropical arboreal ant Odontomachus hastatus (Formicidae, Ponerinae). Insectes Sociaux, 58: 207–217. doi: 10.1007/s00040-010-0138-6.
Pedersen, J.S. & Boomsma, J.J. (1999). Genetic analysis of colony structure in polydomous and polygynous ant populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 66: 115–144.
Peeters, C. & Molet, M. (2010). Colonial Reproduction and Life Histories. Oxford University Press, 159-176 pp.
Purcell, J. & Chapuisat, M. (2012). Bidirectional shifts in colony queen number in a socially polymorphic ant population. Evolution, 67: 1169-1180. doi: 10.1111/evo.12010.
Schlick-Steiner, B.C., Steiner, F.M., Stauffer, C. & Buschinger, A. (2005). Life history traits of a European Messor harvester ant. Insectes Sociaux, 52: 360–365. doi: 10.1007/s00040-005-0819-8.
Stroeymeyt, N., Joye, P. & Keller, L. (2017). Polydomy enhances foraging performance in ant colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284: 1853.doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0269.
Talbot, M. (2012). The natural history of the ants of Michigan’s e. s. George reserve: a 26-year study. Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 228pp.
Terayama, M., Kubota, T. & Eguchi, K. (2014). Encyclopedia of Japanese ants. Asakurasyoten, 278pp.
Yamaguchi, Y., Yazawa, H., Iwanishi, S. & Kudô, K. (2010). Rearing method of a ponerine ant Cryptopone sauteri. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Niigata University, 3: 41-46.
Yamaguchi, Y., Yazawa, H., Iwanishi, S. & Kudô, K. (2016). Differences in body sizes and physiological conditions among castes in the ponerine ant Cryptopone sauteri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomological Science, 19: 124–128. doi: 10.1111/ens.12176.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

eISSN 2447-8067









