The use of tympanic arena as an alternative for behavioral vibroacoustic essays in termites (Blattodea: Isoptera).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i1.2090Keywords:
mechanical communication channel, methods, cheap apparatus,Abstract
In termites, substrate-borne vibrations play an important role in communication among nestmates. The adaptive significance of such an ability has led to an ever-increasing number of studies aimed at improving knowledge on vibroacoustic communication in these insects. Such studies are commonly carried out in laboratory arenas consisting of Petri dishes made of plastic or glass. However, the rigidness of such materials may limit the transmission of vibrational waves impairing accurate records of the feeble vibrations produced by termites. This is one of the reasons why such experiments must be carried out under strictly controlled conditions, using extremely sensitive equipment, usually connected to amplifiers. If, instead, arenas bear a flexible floor (hence simulating a tympanum), vibrations might not be dampened or even easily amplified, thereby overcoming the need for such a specialized setup. Here we test such a hypothesis, using an accelerometer to measure and record vibrations whose intensity was tailored to mimic the feeble vibrations of a small termite species, Constrictotermes cyphergaster. Results support the notion that tympanic arenas portray such vibrations far more accurately than arenas made of plastic or glass. We hence recommend this type of arena as a cheap, albeit accurate, alternative in studies of vibroacoustic behaviors of termites and other insects of comparable size, especially in situations where noise is minimally controlled. These arenas, then, can be useful in conducting such studies just after termite collection in remote regions where well-equipped labs are not available. In doing so, we minimize the stress involved in transporting termites over long distances.
Downloads
References
Cocroft, R., Shugart, H., Konrad, K. & Tibbs, K. (2006). Variation in plant substrates and its consequences for insect vibrational communication. Ethology, 112: 779–789. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01226.x.
Crawley, M.J. (2005). Contrasts. In M. Crawley (Editor) Statistics: An introduction using R, chap.12, (pp. 209–226). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781119941750.ch12.
Cristaldo, P.F., Jandák, V., Kutalová, K., Rodrigues, V.B., Brothánek, M., Jiříček, O., DeSouza, O. & Šobotník, J. (2015). The nature of alarm communication in Constrictotermes cyphergaster (Blattodea: Termitoidea: Termitidae): the integration of chemical and vibroacoustic signals. Biology Open, (pp. bio–014084). doi:10.1242/bio.014084.
Cristaldo, P.F., Rodrigues, V.B., Elliot, S.L., Araújo, A.P. & DeSouza, O. (2016). Heterospecific detection of host alarm cues by an inquiline termite species (Blattodea: Isoptera: Termitidae). Animal Behaviour, 120: 43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.025.
Errobidart, H.A., Gobara, S.T., Piubelli, S.L. & Errobidart, N.C.G. (2014). Ouvido mecânico: um dispositivo experimental para o estudo da propagação e transmissão de uma onda sonora. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 36: 1–6. doi: 10.1590/S1806-11172014000100025.
Evans, T.A., Inta, R., Lai, J.C., Prueger, S., Foo, N.W., Fu, E.W. & Lenz, M. (2009). Termites eavesdrop to avoid competitors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276: 4035–4041. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1147.
Evans, T.A., Lai, J.C., Toledano, E., McDowall, L., Rakotonarivo, S. & Lenz, M. (2005). Termites assess wood size by using vibration signals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 3732–3737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408649102.
Hager, F.A. & Kirchner, W.H. (2013). Vibrational long-distance communication in the termites Macrotermes natalensis and Odontotermes sp. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216: 3249–3256. doi: 10.1242/jeb.086991.
Hager, F.A. & Kirchner, W.H. (2014). Directional vibration sensing in the termite Macrotermes natalensis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217: 2526–2530. doi: 10.1242/jeb.103184.
Howse, P. (1964). The significance of the sound produced by the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Hagen). Animal Behaviour, 12: 284–300. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(64)90015-6.
Howse, P. (1965). On the significance of certain oscillatory movements of termites. Insectes Sociaux, 12: 335–345. doi: 10.1007/BF02222723.
Hunt, J. & Richard, F.J. (2013). Intracolony vibroacoustic communication in social insects. Insectes Sociaux, 60: 403–417. doi: 10.1007/s00040-013-0311-9.
Joyce, A.L., Hunt, R.E., Bernal, J.S. & Bradleigh Vinson, S. (2008). Substrate influences mating success and transmission of courtship vibrations for the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 127: 39–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00670.x.
Mark, L. & Rufus, J. (2013). Animal signals. Current Biology, 23: R829–R833. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.070.
Mathews, A. (1977). Studies on termites from the Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Academia Brasileira de Ciências. URL https://books.google.com.br/books?id=hTEgAQAAMAAJ.
Michelsen, A., Fink, F., Gogala, M. & Traue, D. (1982). Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11: 269–281. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4599546.
Miklas, N., Stritih, N., Cokl, A., Virant-Doberlet, M. & Renou, M. (2001). The influence of substrate on male responsiveness to the female calling song in Nezara viridula. Journal of Insect Behaviour, 14: 313–332. doi: 10.1023/a:1011115111592.
Oberst, S., Bann, G., Lai, J. & Evans, T.A. (2017). Cryptic termites avoid predatory ants by eavesdropping on vibrational cues from their footsteps. Ecology Letters, 20: 212–221. doi: 10.1111/ele.12727.
Šobotník, J., Jirošová, A. & Hanus, R. (2010). Chemical warfare in termites. Journal of Insect Physiology, 56: 1012–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.02.012.
Sosa, M., Carneiro, A., Baffa, O. & Colafemina, J. (2002). Human ear tympanum oscillation recorded using a magnetoresistive sensor. Review of Scientific Instruments, 73: 3695–3697. doi: 10.1063/1.1502444.
Stuart, A. (1963). Studies on the communication of alarm in the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis (Hagen), Isoptera. Physiological Zoology, 36: 85–96. doi: 10.1086/physzool.36.1.30152740.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
