Notes on biology of Brazilian populations of ants of the Pachycondyla foetida species complex (Formicidae: Ponerinae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v60i4.380-386Keywords:
males, cannibalism, castes, secondary monogyny, pleometrosisAbstract
In ants, biology studies are especially important to complete the information aiming to identify species belonging to unresolved or confused taxa in taxonomy. Such observations allow the inclusion of biological data with other characteristics of determined group, something that preserved specimens in collections do not reveal, such as nesting site, foraging time, nuptial flight and especially the relationship between castes, supporting taxonomic analysis and descriptions. Here, nests of three species of the complex foetida of the genus Pachycondyla were observed and collected in three Brazilian localities. Pleometrosis, secondary monogyny and cannibalism were observed for the ant P. inversa. In many ant species, queens newly mated are associated with other queens to establish new colonies, independent of parenthood. In the ant genus Pachycondyla, the reproductive structure varies broadly and aggressiveness seems to be an important factor in structuring the organization and reproductive division in the colony. The occurrence of males in nests of P. inversa and P. curvinodis allowed the description of males. The nuptial flight period was estimated to of P. inversa (August), P. villosa (October) and P. curvinodis (November).Downloads
References
Bolton, B. 2012. Bolton World Catalog Ants. www.antweb.org/world.jsp. Access in 11/30/2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01748.x
Camargo-Mathias, M.I. & Caetano, F.H. 1991. Corpora allata and corpora cardiaca in female ants of the species Neoponera villosa (Hymenopytera: Ponerinae): morphology and histology. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 51: 349–354.
Camargo-Mathias, M.I. & Caetano, F.H. 1992a. Inner female genitalia histology in the ant Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Ponerinae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 52: 235– 244.
Camargo-Mathias, M.I. & Caetano, F.H. 1992b. Ovarian morphology of the ants Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Ponerinae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 52: 251–257.
Camargo-Mathias, M.I. & Caetano, F.H. 1995a. Corpora allata in females of Neoponera villosa ants (Hymenoptera: Ponerinae) relation with ovarian development. Sociobiology, 26: 283–289.
Camargo-Mathias, M.I. & Caetano, F.H. 1995b. Trophic eggs in workers of Neoponera villosa ants (Hymenoptera: Ponerinae). Journal of Advanced Zoology, 16: 62–66.
Camargo-Mathias, M.I & Caetano, F.H. 1996. Histochemical and ultrastructural cytochemistry of glycogene in ovarioles of Neoponera villosa ants (Hymenoptera: Ponerinae). Journal of Advanced Zoology, 17: 64–67.
Camargo-Mathias, M.I., Landim, C.C., & Caetano, F.H. 1991. Ultrastructural aspects of the mandibular glands of Neoponera villosa workers (Hymenoptera: Ponerinae). Journal of Advanced Zoology, 12: 72–80.
Choe, J.C. & Perlman, D.L. 1997. Social conflict and cooperation among founding queens in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In: Choe, J.C, Crespi, B.J (ed) Social behavior in insects and arachnids (pp. 392-406). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511721953.020
D’Ettorre, P., Kellner, K., Delabie, J. H. C. & Heinze, J. 2005. Number of queens in founding associations of the ponerine ant Pachycondyla villosa. Insectes Sociaux, 52: 327–332. (doi:10.1007/s00040-005-0815-z). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-005-0815-z
Dejean, A. 1990. Influence of the preimaginal and precocious environment on the choice of the nest in the ant Pachycondyla villosa (Fabr.). Behavioural Processes, 21: 107–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(90)90019-C
Dejean, A. & Corbara, B. 1990a. L’alimentation sucrée des larves chez Pachycondyla villosa (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Biology of Behavior, 15: 117–124.
Dejean, A. & Corbara, B. 1990b. Predatory behavior of a neotropical arboricolous ant: Pachycondyla villosa (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Sociobiology, 17: 271–286.
Dejean, A. & Corbara, B. 1998. Study of different foraging paths of the predatory neotropical ponerine ant Pachycondyla (=Neoponera) villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 32: 409–426.
Dejean, A. Corbara, B. & Oliva-Rivera, J. 1990. Mise en évidence d’une forme d’apprentissage dans le comportement de capture des proies chez Pachycondyla (=Neoponera) villosa (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Behaviour, 115: 175–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853990X00563
Dejean, A. Olmsted, I. & Camal, J.F. 1992. Interaction between Atta ceplalotes and arboreal ants in the Biosphere Reserve Sian Ka’an (Quintana Roo, Mexixo): efficient protection of the trees (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 20: 57-76.
Dejean, A. Olmsted, I. & Snelling, R.R. 1995. Tree-epiphyte-ant relationships in the low inundated forest of Sian Ka’an Biosphere Reserve, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Biotropica, 27(1): 55-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388903
Dejean, A. & Olmsted, I. 1997. Ecological studies on Aechmea bracteata (Swartz) (Bromeliaceae). Journal Nat. Hist., 31: 1313-1334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939700770741
Driessen, G. J. J., Van Raalte, & De Bruyn, G. J. 1984. Cannibalism in the red wood ant, Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera : Formicidae). Oecologia., 63(1): 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379779
Elgar, M. A. & Crespi, B. J. 1992. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
Forel, A. 1901. Fourmis termitophages, lestobioses, Atta tardigrada, sous-genres d’Euponera. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 45: 389-398.
Forel, A. 1907. Formicides du Musée National Hongrois. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 5: 1-42.
Fresneau, D., Garcia-Pérez, J. & Jaisson, P. 1982. Evolution of polyethism in ants: observational results and teories. In: Jaisson, P. (ed) Social Insects in the Tropics (pp. 129-155). Presses de l’Université Paris-Nord. Paris.
Fresneau, D. 1985. Individual foraging path fidelity: a novel strategy in a ponerine ant. Insectes Sociaux, 32: 109-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224226
Griffin, A.S. & West, S. A. 2002. Kin selection fact and fiction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02355-2
Hatchwell, B. J. & Komdeur, J. 2000. Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav., 59: 1079-1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1394
Hagen, R.H., Smith, D.R. & Rissing, S.W. 1988. Genetic relatedness among co-foundresses of two desert ants, Veromessor pergandei and Acromyrmex versicolor. Psyche, 95: 191-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/1988/40461
Heinze, J. 1993. Queen-queen interactions in polygynous ants. In: Keller, L. (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects (pp. 334-361). Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
Heinze, J., Trunzer, B., Hölldobler, B. & Delabie, J.H.C. 2001. Reproductive skew and queen relatedness in an ant with primary polygyny. Insectes Sociaux., 48: 149–153. (doi:10.1007/PL00001758). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001758
Heinze, J., Stengl, B. & Sledge, M.F. 2002. Worker rank, reproductive status and cuticular hydrocarbon signature in the ant, Pachycondyla cf. inversa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 52: 59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0491-1
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. 1977. The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften, 64: 8-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439886
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. 1990. The ants. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
Hölldobler, B. 1985. Liquid food transmission and antennationsignals in ponerine ants. Israel Journal of Entomology, 19: 89–99.
Keller, L. 1995. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 355-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89133-8
Kokko, H., Johnstone, R. A. & Cutton-Brock, T. H. 2000. The evolution of cooperative breeding trough group augmentation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 268: 187-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1349
Kolmer, K. & Heinze, J. 2000. Comparison between two species in the Pachycondyla villosa complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomologica Basiliensia, 22: 219-222.
Kolmer, K., Hölldobler, B. & Heinze, J. 2002. Colony and population structure in Pachycondyla cf. inversa, a ponerine ant with primary polygyny. Ethology Ecology & Evolution., 14: 157-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2002.9522754
Lachaud, J.P., Fresneau, D. & García-Pérez, J. 1984. Etude des stratégies d’approvisionnement chez trois espèces de fourmis Ponerines (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 61: 159–177.
Leal, I. R. & Oliveira, P.S. 1995. Behavioral ecology of the Neotropical termite-hunting ant Pachycondyla (=Termitopone) marginata: colony founding, group raiding and migratory patterns. Behav Ecol Sociobiol., 37: 373-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170584
Mackay, W. & Mackay, E. 2010. The Sistematic and Biology of the New World ants of the Pachycondyla (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Texas:The Edwin Mellen Press, Ltd.
Maes, J.M. 1989. Catálogo de los insectos contraladores biológicos en Nicaragua: Insectos Depredadores (I Part). Revista Nicaraguense de Entomologia, 8: 11- 106.
Mariano, C. S. F., Pompolo, S. G., & Delabie, J. H. C. 2000. Citogenética das espécies gêmeas e simpátricas Pachycondyla villosa e Pachycondyla sp ‘inversa’ (Ponerinae). Naturalia, 24: 215–217.
Monnin, T. & C. Peeters. 1997. Cannibalism of subordinates’ eggs in the monogynous queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. Naturwissenschaften, 84: 499–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050433
Paul, J. & Roces, F. 2003. Fluid intake rates in ants correlate with their feeding habits. Journal of Insect Physiology, 49: 347-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00019-2
Peeters, C. & K. Tsuji. 1993. Reproductive conflict among ant worker in Diacamma sp. from Japan: dominance and oviposition in the absence of the gamergate. Insectes Sociaux. 40: 119–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240701
Rissing, S.W. & Pollock, G.B. 1988. Pleometrosis and polygyny in ants. In: Jeanne, R.L, (ed) Interindividual behavioural variability in social insects (pp. 179-221). Boulder: Westview Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429040474-7
Rodrigues, M. S., Vilela, E. F., Azevedo, D. O. & Hora, R. R. 2011. Multiple queens in founding colonies of the Neotropical ant Pachycondyla striata Smith (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Neotropical Entomology, 40(3): 293-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2011000300001
Sasaki, K., Satoh, T. & Obara, Y. 1996. Cooperative foundation of colonies by unrelated foundresses in the ant Polyrhachis moesta. Insectes Sociaux, 43: 217-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242573
Tentschert, J., Kolmer, k., Hölldobler, B., Bestmann, H.J., Delabie, J.H.C. & Heinze, J. 2001. Chemical profiles, division of labor and social status in Pachycondyla queens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften, 88: 175-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140100218
Trunzer, B., Heinze, J. & Hölldobler, B. 1998. Cooperative colony founding and experimental primary polygyny in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla villosa. Insectes Sociaux, 45: 267–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050087
Valenzuela-Gonzalez, J., Lopez-Mendes, A. & García-Ballinas, A. 1994. Ciclo de actividad y aprovisionamento de Pachycondyla villosa (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) en agroecosistemas cacaoteros del soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 91: 9–21.
Walters J. R., Doerr, P. D., Carter, I. I. I. J. H. 1992. Delayed dispersal and reproduction as a life-history tactic in cooperative breeders: Fitness calculations from Read-cockaded woodpeckers. Am Nat., 139: 623-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/285347
Wheeler, W. M.1942. Studies of Neotropical ant-plants and their ants. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 90:1-262 + 57 plates.
Wild, A. L. 2005. Taxonomic revision of the Pachycondyla apicalis species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 834: 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.834.1.1
Wilson, E. O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Cambridge, Mass. Belknap Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).