Evaluating Efficiency of Different Sampling Methods for Arboreal Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in A West African Forest-Savanna Mosaic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v67i4.5558Keywords:
Pitfall trap, “funnel” trap, Lamto reserve, biodiversity, habitat structure, tree canopyAbstract
Ants constitute an important part of arboreal arthropod biomass in rainforests. Nevertheless, there are only a few methods which permit a rapid assessment of these insects in the canopy layer. This study aims at evaluating the efficiency of a new variant type of pitfall trap i.e. “the funnel trap”, to sample arboreal ants in a secondary and gallery forest in Lamto reserve (Côte d’Ivoire). This method was compared to standard arboreal pitfall trap and beating. In total, the 3 methods yielded 7072 ant workers belonging to 43 species, 14 genera and 5 subfamilies. Tree beating recorded the highest ant’s numerical abundance (3670 workers), with 27 species, 12 genera and 3 subfamilies followed by the “funnel trap” that yielded 2800 ant workers, with 23 species belonging to 12 genera and 5 subfamilies. Finally, arboreal pitfall traps caught the lowest individual with 602 ant workers from 20 species belonging to 9 genera and 3 subfamilies. The composition of species which are caught by arboreal pitfall trap and “funnel trap” was similar at 53 percent. Tree beating showed a distinct species composition compared to arboreal pitfall trap and “funnel trap”. The “funnel trap” could be a fast and efficient way to quickly assess ant-biodiversity in forest canopies and agroecosystems as it looks like a non-destructive sampling method.
Downloads
References
Abbadie, L., Gignoux J., Lepage, M., & Roux, X.L. (2006). Environmental constraints on living organisms. In Abbadie L., Gignoux J., Roux X.L. & Lepage M. (Eds.), Lamto (pp. 45-61). Springer, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33857-8_4
Agosti, D. & Alonso, L.E. (2000). The ALL protocol: a standard protocol for the collection of ground-dwelling ants. In Agosti, D., Majer, J., Alonso, L.E. & Schultz, T. (Eds.), Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Press, Washington, pp. 204-206, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16183.
AntWeb. Available from https://www.antweb.org. (Accessed date: 12 November 2019)
Basset, Y., Springate, N.D., Aberlenc, H.P. & Delvare, G. (1997). A review of methods for sampling arthropods in tree canopies. Canopy Arthropods, 35: 27-52.
Basset, Y., Kitching, R.L., Miller,SE. & Novotny, V. (2003b). Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge: University Press, 490 p.
Bolton, B. (1980). The ant tribe Tetramoriini: The genus Tetramorium Mayr in the Ethiopian zoogeographical region. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Entomology), 40: 193-384.
Bolton, B. (1982). Afrotropical species of the myrmicine ant genera Cardiocondyla, Leptothorax, Melissotarsus, Messor, and Cataulacus. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Entomology), 45: 307-370.
Bolton, B. (1987). A review of the Solenopsis genus-group and revision of Afrotropical Monomorium Mayr. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Entomology), 54: 263-452.
Castaño-Meneses, G. (2014). Trophic guild structure of a canopy ant community in a mexican tropical deciduous forest. Sociobiology, 61: 35-42. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.35-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.35-42
Chapin, K.J. & Smith, K.H. (2019). Vertically Stratified Arthropod Diversity in a Florida Upland Hardwood Forest. Florida Entomologist, 102: 211-215. doi: 10.1653/024. 102.0134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0134
Dambros, J., França, V.V., Delabie, J.H.C., Marques, M.I. & Battirola, L.D. (2018). Canopy Ant Assemblage (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Two Vegetation Formations in the Northern Brazilian Pantanal. Sociobiology, 65: 358-369. doi: 10.13102/ sociobiology. v65i3.1932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.1932
Dejean, A., McKey, D., Gibernau, M. & Belin, M. (2000). Arboreal ant mosaic in a Cameroonian rainforest (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 35: 403-423. doi: 10.5252/zoosystema2019v41a10
Delage, B. (1970). Etude des Fourmis arboricoles de savane. Bulletin de Liaison des Chercheurs de Lamto Mars, 1970: 22-24.
Delage-Darchen, B. (1971). Contribution à l’étude écologique d’une savane de Côte d’Ivoire. Les Fourmis des strates herbacée et arborée. Biologica Gabonica, 7: 461-496.
Delage-Darchen, B. (1972). Une Fourmi de Côte d’Ivoire Melissotarsus titubans Delage n.sp. Insectes Sociaux, 19: 213-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02226627
Delage-Darchen, B. (1973). Evolution de l’aile chez les Fourmis Crematogaster (Myrmicinae) d’Afrique. Insectes Sociaux, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223192
: 221-242.
Delage-Darchen, B. (1974). Ecologie et biologie de Crematogaster impressa Emery., fourmi savanicole d’Afrique (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux, 21: 13-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222977
Del Toro, I., Ribbons, R.R. & Pelini, S.L. (2012). The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 17: 133-146.
Fisher, B.L. & Bolton, B. (2016). Ants of Africa and Madagascar: a guide to the genera. University of California Press, 251p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520962996
Floren, A., Wetzel, W. & Staab, M. (2014). The contribution of canopy species to overall ant diversity (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in temperate and tropical ecosystems. Myrmecological News, 19: 65-74.
García-Martínez, M.Á., Martínez-Tlapa, D.L., Pérez-Toledo, G.R., Quiroz-Robledo, L.N., Castaño-Meneses, G., Laborde, J. & Valenzuela-González, J.E. (2015). Taxonomic, species and functional group diversity of ants in a tropical anthropogenic landscape. Tropical Conservation Science, 8: 1017-1032. doi : 10.1177/194008291500800412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800412
García-Martínez, M. A., Presa-Parra E., Valenzuela-González J.E. & Lasa R.. (2018). The Fruit Fly Lure CeraTrap: An Effective Tool for the Study of the Arboreal Ant Fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Insect Science, 18: 16. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iey078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey078
Gnahoré, E., Missa, K., Koné, M., Gueulou, N. & Bakayoko A. (2018). Dynamique et structure de la flore de la Savane Protégée des Feux dans la Réserve Scientifique de Lamto (Centre de la Côte d’Ivoire). European Scientific Journal, 14: 432. doi: 10.19044/esj.2018.v14n36p432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n36p432
Hahn, D.A. & Wheeler D.E.. (2002). Seasonal Foraging Activity and Bait Preferences of Ants on Barro Colorado Island, Panama1. Biotropica, 34: 348-356, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00548.x
Hammer Ø., Harper D.A. & Ryan P.D.. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia electronica, 4(1), 9p.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O., (1990). The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
Klimes, P., Idigel, C., Rimandai, M., Fayle, T.M., Janda, M. Weiblen, G.D. & Novotny, V. (2012). Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests? Journal of Animal Ecology, 81: 1103-1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012. 02002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x
Klimes, P. (2017). Diversity and specificity of ant-plant interactions in canopy communities: insights from primary and secondary tropical forests in New Guinea, in Oliveira, P.S. & Koptur, S. (Eds). Ant-Plant Interactions: Impacts of Humans on Terrestrial Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press: 26-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671825.003
Leponce, M., Delabie, J.H.C., Orivel, J., Jacquemin, J., Calvo Martin, M. & Dejean, A. (2019). Tree-dwelling ant survey (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Mitaraka, French Guiana. In Touroult J. (Eds.), “Our Planet Reviewed” 2015 large-scale biotic survey in Mitaraka, French Guiana. Zoosystema, 41: 163-179. doi: 10.5252/zoosystema2019v41a10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2019v41a10
Lach, L., Parr, L.C. & Abbott K.L. (2010). Ant Ecology. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 424 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544639.001.0001
Lévieux, J. (1976). La structure du nid de quelques Fourmis arboricoles d’Afrique tropicale (Hymenoptera Formicidae).Annales de l’Université d’Abidjan, C 12: 5-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224113
Longino, J.T., Branstetter, M.G. & Ward, P.S. (2019). Ant diversity patterns across tropical elevation gradients: effects of sampling method and subcommunity. Ecosphere, 10. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2798
Philpott, S.M., Greenberg, R., Bichier, P. & Perfecto, I. (2004). Impacts of major predators on tropical agroforest arthropods: comparisons within and across taxa. Oecologia, 140: 140-149. doi 10.1007/s00442-004-1561-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1561-z
Philpott, S.M. & Armbrecht I. (2006). Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function. Ecological Entomology, 31: 369-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00793.x
Powell, S., Costa, A.N., Lopes, C.T. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2011). Canopy connectivity and the availability of diverse nesting resources affect species coexistence in arboreal ants. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80: 352-360, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01779.x
Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x
Rigato, F. (2016). The ant genus Polyrhachis F. Smith in sub-Saharan Africa, with descriptions of ten new species. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 4088: 1-50, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4088.1.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4088.1.1
Schonberg, L.A., Longino, J.T., Nadkarni, N.M., Yanoviak, S.P. & Gering, J.C. (2004). Arboreal Ant Species Richness in Primary Forest, Secondary Forest, and Pasture Habitats of a Tropical Montane Landscape. Biotropica, 36: 402-409. doi: 10.1646/03134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00333.x
Sousa-Souto, L; Figueiredo, P.M.G; Ambrogi, B.G; Oliveira, A.C.F; Ribeiro, G.T & Neves, F.S.; (2016). Composition and Richness of Arboreal Ants in Fragments of Brazilian Caatinga: Effects of Secondary Succession. Sociobiology, 63: 762-769. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.909
Underwood, E.C. & Fisher B.L. (2006). The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biological conservation, 132: 166-182. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.022
Vasconcelos, H.L., Vilhena, J.M.S., Facure, K.G. & Albernaz, A.L.K.M. (2010). Patterns of ant species diversity and turnover across 2000 km of Amazonian floodplain forest. Journal of Biogeography, 37: 432-440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02230.x
Yeo, K., Tiho, S., Ouattara, K., Konate, S., Kouakou, L.M. M. & Fofana, M. (2013). Impact de la fragmentation et de la pression humaine sur la relique forestière de l’Université d’Abobo-Adjamé (Côte d’Ivoire). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 61: 4551-4565. doi: 10.4314/jab.v61i0.85602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v61i0.85602
Yusah, K.M., Fayle, T.M., Harris, G. & Foster, W.A. (2012). Optimizing diversity assessment protocols for high canopy ants in tropical rain forest. Biotropica, 44: 73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00775.x
Yusah K.M., Foster, W.A., Reynolds, G. & Fayle T.M. (2018). Ant mosaics in Bornean primary rain forest high canopy depend on spatial scale, time of day, and sampling method. Peer J, 6: e4231. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4231
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
