Edge-computing and Deep Learning Integration for Real-time, High-resolution Monitoring of Apis cerana cerana Fabricius Entrance Traffic

Authors

  • Jia-Xu Wu Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, & Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China
  • Hao-Yu Han Hainan Jiada Technology Co., Ltd., Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China
  • Han-Jun Liu Hainan Jiada Technology Co., Ltd., Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China
  • Yi-Xian Guo Hainan Jiada Technology Co., Ltd., Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China
  • Jing-Lin Gao Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China
  • Shan Zhao Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China
  • Shi-Jie Wang Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v73i3.12729

Keywords:

Video monitoring, object detection, multi-object tracking, precision apiculture

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of honey bee (Apis cerana cerana Fabricius) entrance traffic is essential for evaluating colony health and foraging dynamics in precision apiculture. Existing vision-based systems struggle to balance high spatiotemporal resolution, real-time processing capabilities, and cost-effective field deployment. We developed a low-cost, standalone edge-computing framework that integrates a 60-fps global-shutter camera with an Orange Pi 5B single-board computer. Using a PP-YOLOE+ object detection model (mean Average Precision at IoU threshold 0.5 of 0.95) coupled with the ByteTrack algorithm, the system performs robust, real-time multi-object tracking and directional counting locally at 35 fps. A 30-day continuous field deployment across three colonies successfully processed over two million entry and exit events, yielding a Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy of 77.8%. Subsequent biological analysis of this dataset revealed synchronized bimodal diurnal foraging rhythms across multiple colonies, indicating that shared environmental factors strongly influenced foraging behaviors. By maintaining stable analytical accuracy on affordable hardware without relying on continuous cloud processing, this system provides a scalable, non-invasive solution for automated colony assessment and data-driven precision apiculture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alex, A.J., Barnes, C.M., Machado, P., Ihianle, I., Markó, G., Bencsik, M. & Bird, J.J. (2025). Enhancing pollinator conservation: Monitoring of bees through object recognition. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 228: 109665.

Amin, S.U., Hussain, A., Kim, B. & Seo, S. (2023). Deep learning-based active learning technique for data annotation and improve the overall performance of classification models. Expert Systems with Applications, 228: 120391.

Borlinghaus, P., Odemer, R., Tausch, F., Schmidt, K. & Grothe, O. (2022). Honey bee counter evaluation – Introducing a novel protocol for measuring daily loss accuracy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 197: 106957.

Bozek, K., Hebert, L., Portugal, Y., Mikheyev, A.S. & Stephens, G.J. (2021). Markerless tracking of an entire honey bee colony. Nature Communications, 12: 1733.

Chen, W.S., Wang, C.H., Jiang, J.A. & Yang, E.C. (2015). Development of a monitoring system for honeybee activities. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 745-750.

Hadjur, H., Ammar, D. & Lefèvre, L. (2022). Toward an intelligent and efficient beehive: A survey of precision beekeeping systems and services. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 192: 106604.

Kimura, T., Ohashi, M., Crailsheim, K., Schmickl, T., Okada, R., Radspieler, G. & Ikeno, H. (2014). Development of a new method to track multiple honey bees with complex behaviors on a flat laboratory arena. PLoS ONE, 9: e84656.

Kulyukin, V.A. & Kulyukin, A.V. (2023). Accuracy vs. energy: An assessment of bee object inference in videos from on-hive video loggers with YOLOv3, YOLOv4-Tiny, and YOLOv7-Tiny. Sensors, 23: 6791.

Ratnayake, M.N., Dyer, A.G. & Dorin, A. (2021). Tracking individual honeybees among wildflower clusters with computer vision-facilitated pollinator monitoring. PLoS ONE, 16: e0239504.

Rodriguez, I.F., Chan, J., Alvarez Rios, M., Branson, K., Agosto-Rivera, J.L., Giray, T. & Mégret, R. (2022). Automated video monitoring of unmarked and marked honey bees at the hive entrance. Frontiers in Computer Science, 3: 769338.

Zheng, Y., Cao, X., Xu, S., Guo, S., Huang, R., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, L., Cao, X., Idrus, Z. & Sun, H. (2024). Intelligent beehive monitoring system based on internet of things and colony state analysis. Smart Agricultural Technology, 9: 100584.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Wu, J.-X., Han, H.-Y., Liu, H.-J., Guo, Y.-X., Gao, J.-L., Zhao, S., & Wang, S.-J. (2026). Edge-computing and Deep Learning Integration for Real-time, High-resolution Monitoring of Apis cerana cerana Fabricius Entrance Traffic. Sociobiology, 73(3), e12729. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v73i3.12729

Issue

Section

Research Article - Bees