Diel Patterns Hold Promise as an Ecological Trait for Ants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v71i1.10081Keywords:
ants, traits, temporal activity, ecologyAbstract
Ecological traits have flourished in insect-based studies, resulting in a substantial and growing list of measurable traits. One trait that will likely become more attractive as data quality and curation improve is the diel patterns of insect activities. Diel patterns in ants can help better understand vital ecological processes such as competition and invasion biology. Because diel activity has the potential to be an informative trait in ants, we assessed the diel designations of foraging ants across the literature to quantify and assess the variation and sampling extent of this particular trait. We collected diel designations from 104 peer-reviewed scientific articles and quantified these data across important and documented ecological traits. We found that a disproportionate amount of solitary foraging ants were primarily diurnal foragers relative to ants that cooperatively forage. Our data show that diel patterns in foraging vary widely within and across ant genera. Importantly, we highlight the undersampling of this crucial ecological trait, which currently limits its utility. Our efforts highlight the importance of assessing an ecologically important trait’s landscape of reported data.
Downloads
References
Anderson, C. & McShea, D.W. (2001) Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 76: 211–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005656
Bartomeus, I., Ascher, J.S., Gibbs, J., Danforth, B.N., Wagner, D.L., Hedtke, S.M. & Winfree, R. (2013) Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110: 4656–4660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218503110
Das, B. & de Bekker, C. (2022) Time-course RNASeq of Camponotus floridanus forager and nurse ant brains indicate links between plasticity in the biological clock and behavioral division of labor. BMC Genomics, 23: 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-08282-x
Firebaugh, A. & Haynes, K.J. (2019) Light pollution may create demographic traps for nocturnal insects. Basic and Applied Ecology, 34: 118–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2018.07.005
Gibb, H., Bishop, T.R., Leahy, L., Parr, C.L., Lessard, J.-P., Sanders, N.J., Shik, J.Z., Ibarra-Isassi, J., Narendra, A., Dunn, R.R. & Wright, I.J. (2022) Ecological strategies of (pl)ants: Towards a world‐wide worker economic spectrum for ants. Functional Ecology, 37: 13–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14135
Grubisic, M., Van Grunsven, R.H.A., Kyba, C.C.M., Manfrin, A. & Hölker, F. (2018) Insect declines and agroecosystems: Does light pollution matter? The Annals of Applied Biology, 173: 180–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12440
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
Homburg, K., Homburg, N., Schäfer, F., Schuldt, A. & Assmann, T. (2014) Carabids.org - a dynamic online database of ground beetle species traits (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity, 7: 195–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12045
Kawahara, A.Y., Plotkin, D., Hamilton, C.A., Gough, H., St Laurent, R., Owens, H.L., Homziak, N.T. & Barber, J.R. (2018) Diel behavior in moths and butterflies: A synthesis of data illuminates the evolution of temporal activity. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution, 18: 13–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-017-0350-6
Klotz, J.H. (1984) Diel differences in foraging in two ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 57: 111–118.
Lei, Y., Zhou, Y., Lü, L. & He, Y. (2019) Rhythms in foraging behavior and expression patterns of the foraging gene in Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in relation to photoperiod. Journal of Economic Entomology, 112: 2923–2930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz175
Lövei, G.L. & Sunderland, K.D. (1996) Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 41: 231–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001311
McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21: 178–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002
Narendra, A., Reid, S.F. & Raderschall, C.A. (2013) Navigational efficiency of nocturnal Myrmecia ants suffers at low light levels. PLoS ONE, 8: e58801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058801
Ohyama, L., Booher, D.B. & King, J.R. (2023) Ecological traits of social insects: Colony, queen and worker size relationships reveal a nexus trait with broad ecological relevance. Functional Ecology, 37: 2194–2206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14355
Ottesen, P.S. (1985) Diel activity patterns of South Scandinavian high mountain ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecography, 8: 191–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1985.tb01170.x
Palavalli-Nettimi, R. & Narendra, A. (2018) Miniaturization decreases visual navigational competence in ants. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 221: 177238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.177238
Parr, C.L. & Bishop, T.R. (2022) The response of ants to climate change. Global Change Biology, 28: 3188–3205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16140
Pearson, D.L. (1988) Biology of tiger beetles. Annual Review of Entomology, 33: 123-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.33.1.123
Roeder, D.V., Paraskevopoulos, A.W. & Roeder, K.A. (2022) Thermal tolerance regulates foraging behavior of ants. Ecological Entomology, 47: 331–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13118
Roeder, K.A., Roeder, D.V. & Bujan, J. (2021) Ant Thermal Tolerance: A Review of Methods, Hypotheses, and Sources of Variation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 114: 459–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saab018
Sánchez-Bayo, F. & Wyckhuys, K.A.G. (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biological Conservation, 232: 8–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020
Twardochleb, L., Hiltner, E., Pyne, M. & Zarnetske, P. (2021) Freshwater insects CONUS: A database of freshwater insect occurrences and traits for the contiguous United States. Global Ecology and Biogeography: A Journal of Macroecology, 30: 826–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13257
Wagner, D.L., Grames, E.M., Forister, M.L., Berenbaum, M.R. & Stopak, D. (2021) Insect decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a thousand cuts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118: e2023989118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023989118
Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.E. & Blüthgen, N. (2014) Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: Interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology, 95: 466–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0436.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leo Ohyama, Douglas B. Booher, Andrea Lucky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
