In Shadows and Darkness: being authentic in Céline and Hillman (“intimité des choses” and “pathologizing” )


  • Cláudio Cledson Novaes
  • Aleš Vrbata Universidade Carolina



Aim of this paper is to demonstrate a proximity or even complementarity between James Hillman’s and Louis-Ferdinand Céline’s vision of  human soul and human condition. Even though their cultural and intellectual context differed significantly and they both used very different forms of expression, they repeatedly invoked intimate dimension of human existence as permeated by somehow pathological, peripherial or dark aspects of being. Nevertheless, both of them shared deep interest in bottom-line dimension of being which they called “soul” and which they linked with death, darkness, weakness and which they associated with  socially disapproved ways of being. Even though Hillman could be labeled as reformist and Céline as nihilist, for both of them modern society and its programming cut modern man off his deeper sense of meaningfulness or as Céline puts it in from “intimité des choses”. Questioning intellectual legacy of Enlightenment, both Céline and Hillman find soul of modern man as pathologized and threatened but at the same time as the very source of meaningfulness. Like that Hillman and Céline can be viewed not just as cultural critics but as actively deconstructing, questioning modern project and modern subjectivity


Não há dados estatísticos.


Carregando Métricas ...


ADAMS, M.V. "Image, Active Imagination, and the Imaginal Level: A Quadrant Interview with Robert Bosnak," Quadrant, 25, 2; 9-29.

ADAMS, Michael Vannoy. The Multicultural Imagination."Race", Color and the Unconscious. London and New York: Routledge 1996.

ADAMS, M.V. The Mythological Unconscious. New York : Spring 2010.

AEBERSOLD, D. Goéthie de Céline. Société d´études céliniennes : Paris 2008.

CÉLINE, L.-F. Cesta do hlubin noci. Praha: Fr. Borový, 1934.

CÉLINE, Louis-Ferdinand. Mort à crédit. Paris : Gallimard, 1952.

Céline Letters à Milton Hindus, 1947-1949. Paris : Gallimard, 2012.

EDINGER, E. F. "The New Myth of Meaning". Quadrant, vol. 10. n° 1, summer 1977, pp. 23-38.

HILLMAN, James. Re-Visioning Psychology. New York: Harper & Row 1975.

HILLMAN, J. Inter Views. Conversations with Laura Pozzo on Psychotherapy, Biography, Love, Soul, Dreams, Work, Imagination, and the State of the Culture. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1983.

HILLMAN, J. The Myth of Analysis. New York: Northwestern University Press, 1997.

HILLMAN, J. – VENTURA, M. We´ve Had a Hundred Years of Psychotherapy – And the World´s Getting Worse. New York: Harper Collins, 2007.

HILLMAN, James. "The Language of Psychology and the Speech of the Soul", In: Eranos Jahrbuch 37-1968, Zürich: Rhein, 1970, pp. 177.

JUNG, C.G. "A Psychological Approach to the Dogma of Trinity", in: Psychology of Religion: West and East (CW, vol.11). New York, London 1958.

NEUMANN, E. The Great Mother. Bollingen Series XLVII. 2nd edition, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.

OSTROVSKY, E. Céline and His Vision. New York: New York University Press, 1967.

RENNIE, B. S. Reconstructing Eliade. Making Sense of Religion. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.

RUSSELL, Dick. The Life and the Ideas of James Hillman. The Making of a Psychologist, vol. 1. New York: Helios Press, 2013.

TACEY, David. After Tradition: Closer Encounters with the Sacred. Based on the talk given at St. Hilda´s College, Oxford University in August 2007. London: The Guild of Pastoral Psychology, 2007.

TACEY, David. The Spirituality Revolution. The Emergence of Contemporary Spirituality. New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2004.

TACEY, David. "Twisting and Turning with James Hillman. From Anima to World Soul, from Academia to Pop", in: Ann Casement (ed.) Post-Jungians Today. Key papers in contemporary analytical psychology. London/New York: Routledge 2005, pp. 215-234.




Como Citar

Novaes, C. C., & Vrbata, A. (2017). In Shadows and Darkness: being authentic in Céline and Hillman (“intimité des choses” and “pathologizing” ). A Cor Das Letras, 18(1), 128–141.