Why Brazil is not ready for the Twenty-First Century Taxonomy: a zoological view

Authors

  • Sergio Ricardo Andena Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/scb201

Abstract

Taxonomy has suffered from a lack of funds, attracting fewer students, and has been considered by some a mere descriptive field, a second-class science. Many authors have extensively pointed out the urgency of increasing our knowledge of biodiversity. Recently, a movement integrating researchers, institutes, and collections arose for addressing the biodiversity crisis and raising the status of taxonomy to ‘Big Science’. This article discusses some impediments that are preventing Brazil entering the new era of taxonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avanços e Desafios dos Serviços Públicos On Line 2009. Políticas públicas em foco. Boletim Fundap-Cebrap. Available at <http://www.boletim-fundap.cebrap.org.br/n3/?subject=leitura-indicadores-p1>; accessed in 3 Ago. 2012.

Brandão, C.R.F.; Cancello, E.M. & Yamamoto, C.I. 2000. Avaliação do estado do conhecimento da diversidade biológica do Brasil. Invertebrados Terrestres – versão preliminar. Available at http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sbf/chm/doc/invter1.pdf; accessed in 20 Ago. 2012.

Ducke, A. 1907. Connaissance de la faune Hyménoptérologique du nord-est du Brésil. Revue D'entomologique 26: 73–96.

Fernadens, L. 2006. Presentation. In: A.L. Peixoto, D.A.L. Canhos, L. Marinoni & R. Vazoller (orgs), Diretrizes e Estratégias para a Modernização de Coleções Biológicas Brasileiras e a Consolidação de Sistemas Integrados de Informação sobre Biodiversidade. Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos/Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasília, p. 183–211.

Huxley, J. 1940. The New Systematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Knapp, S. 2004. Systematics: a science of three parts. Natural History Museum 4: 10–13.

Knapp, S. 2008.Taxonomy as a team sport. In: Q.D. Wheeler (ed.), The New Taxonomy. The systematic association special volume series 76. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, p. 33–54

Krell, F.T. 2002. Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy. Nature 415: 957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415957a

Marinoni, L.; Magalhães, C. & Marques, A.C. 2006. Propostas de estratégias e ações para a consolidação das coleções zoológicas brasileiras. In: A.L. Peixoto, D.A.L. Canhos, L. Marinoni & R. Vazoller (orgs), Diretrizes e Estratégias para a Modernização de Coleções Biológicas Brasileiras e a Consolidação de Sistemas Integrados de Informação sobre Biodiversidade. Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos/Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasília, p. 183–211.

Marques, A.C. & Lamas, C.J.E. 2006. Taxonomia zoológica no Brasil: estado da arte, expectativas e sugestões de ações futuras. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 46(13): 139–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492006001300001

Minelli, A. 2003. The status of taxonomic literature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 75–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00051-4

Oswaldo-Cruz, E. 2010. Atração e fixação de doutores na região amazônica. Academia Brasileira de Ciências Homepage. Available at http://www.abc.org.br/article.php3?id_article=703; accessed in 20 Ago. 2012.

Page, L.M. 2006. Planetary biodiversity inventories: a response to the taxonomic crisis. Action Bioscience E-Newsletter. American Institute of Biological Science. Available at <http://www.actionbioscience.org/biodiversity/page.html>; accessed in 31 Oct. 2012.

Speers, L. 2005. E-types–a new resource for taxonomic research. In: C.L. Häuser, A. Steiner, J. Holstein & M.J. Scoble (eds), Digital Imaging of Biological Type Specimens, a Manual of Best Practice. Results from a study of the European Network for Biodiversity Information. Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgard, p. 13–18.

Speers, L & Edwards, J.L. 2008. International infrastructure for enabling the new taxonomy: the role of the global biodiversity information facility (GBIF). In: Q.D. Wheeler (ed.), The New Taxonomy. The systematic association special volume series 76. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, p. 87–94.

Wheeler, Q.D. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 359: 571–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1452

Wheeler, Q.D. 2008. Introduction: toward the new taxonomy. In: Q.D. Wheeler (ed.), The New Taxonomy. The systematics association special volume series 76. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, p. 1–18.

Wilson, E.O. 2004. The meaning of biodiversity and the tree of life. In: J. Cracraft & M.J. Donoghue (eds), Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 539–542p.

Downloads

Published

2013-07-18

How to Cite

Andena, S. R. (2013). Why Brazil is not ready for the Twenty-First Century Taxonomy: a zoological view. SITIENTIBUS série Ciências Biológicas, 13. https://doi.org/10.13102/scb201

Issue

Section

Opinions