Evaluation of Insects that Exploit Temporary Protein Resources Emphasizing the Action of Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a Neotropical Semi-deciduous Forest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i1.43-51Keywords:
formicidae, behavioral, interactionsAbstract
The majority of the ants is opportunistic and generalist foragers, commonly feeding on vegetable secretions, seeds, and living or dead animal material. They may be present on any type of substrate even, occasionally on carcasses. This work, then, aimed to evaluate the action of insects, especially ants, in the exploitation of protein resources in forest environment. Monthly collections were made over a year and, in each collection, were made observations during 12 consecutive hours. To simulate exposure of protein resources we used three types of baits, sardines, beef liver and chicken. To evaluate the importance of ants on protein resources for each type of bait there was a control replica with physical barrier to prevent their access. The ants were observed on all baits throughout the collection period. In total, the baits were visited by 34 species of ants. The main genus of ants to visit the baits were: Pheidole, Crematogaster and Solenopsis. These results demonstrate that the presence of ants is important to ecological succession on temporary protein sources in forest environments interfering in the occurrence of other frequent groups in this type of resource, such as flies, for instance. The species that dominated the baits, when presents, were those that regardless of size and aggressiveness, presented mass recruitment and exploited the baits with large flow of individuals Although some species that exhibit certain characteristics can locate the baits faster and eventually dominate them at some point, depending on the ants species that co-occur, the results for the sequence of colonization can be modified.Downloads
References
Andersen, A.N. (1992). Regulation of “momentary” diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of Australian seasonal tropics. American Naturalist, 140: 401-420. doi: 10.1086/285419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/285419
Begon, M., Townsend, C. R. & Harper, J. L. (2006). Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Benson, W. W. & Brandão, C. R. F. (1986). Pheidole Diversity in the humid tropics: a survey from Serra dos Carajas, Pará, Brasil. In International Congress of Iussi X, Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects (pp. 593-594). Munique.
Bestelmeyer, B.T. (2000). The trade-off between thermal tolerance and behavioral dominance in a subtropical South American ant community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69: 998-1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2000.00455.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00455.x
Bie, G. & Hewitt, P.H. (1990). Thermal responses of the semi-arid zone ants Ocymyrmex weitzeckerii (Emery) and Anoplolepis custodiens (Smith). Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa, 53: 65-73.
Bolton, B. (1994). Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 222p.
Bolton, B. (1995). A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 504p.
Bolton, B. (2003). Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 71: 01-370.
Brandão, C.R.F., Silvestre, R. & Reis-Menezes, A. (2000). Influência das interações comportamentais entre espécie de formigas em levantamentos faunísticos em comunidades de cerrado. In R.P. Martins, T.M. Lewinsohn, & M.S. Barbeitos (Eds.), Ecologia e comportamento de Insetos. (pp. 371-404). Brasil: Oecologia Brasiliensis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2000.0801.14
Centeno, N., Maldonado, M. & Oliva, A. (2002). Seasonal patterns of arthropods occurring on sheltered and unsheltered pig carcasses in Buenos Aires Province (Argentina). Forensic Science International, 126: 63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00037-3
Cerdá, X., Retana, J. & Cross, S. (1997). Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66: 363-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/5982
Cerdá, X., Retana, J. & Manzaneda, A. (1998). The role of competition by dominants and temperature in the foraging of subordinate species in Mediterranean ant communities. Oecologia. 117: 404-412. doi: 10.1007/s004420050674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050674
Clark, W.H., & Blom, P.E. (1991). Observations of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae, Formicinae, Dolichoderinae) utilizing carrion. Southwestern Naturalist, 36: 140-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3672133
Conconi, J.R.E., & Rodríguez, H.B. (1977). Valor nutritivo de ciertos insectos comestibles de México y lista de algunos insectos comestibles del Mundo. Anales del Instituto de Biologia de la UNAM Serie Zoologia, 48: 165-186.
Cruz, T. M., & Vasconcelos, S.D. (2006). Entomofauna de solo associada á decomposição de carcaça de suíno em um fragmento de Mata Atlântica de Pernambuco, Brasil. Biociências, 14: 193-201.
Dajoz, R. (2000). Insects and forests: the role and diversity of insects in the forest environment. Paris: Intercept Lavoisier, 620 p. doi: 10.1023/A:1017498600382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017498600382
Davidson, D.W. (1998). Resource discovery versus domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecological Entomology, 23: 484‑490. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00145.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00145.x
De Bie, G. & Hewitt, P. H. (1990). Thermal responses of the semi-arid zone ants Ocymyrmex weitzeckerii and Anoplolepis custodiens (Smith). Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa, 53: 65-73.
Delabie, J. H. C. & Fernández, F. (2003). Relaciones entre hormigas y “homópteros” (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha y Auchenorrhyncha). In F. Fernández (Eds.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical (pp. 181-197). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
Ellwood, M. D. F. & Foster, W.A. (2004). Doubling the estimate of invertebrate biomass in a rainforest canopy. Nature. 429: 549-551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02560
Erwin, T.L. (1989). Canopy arthropod biodiversity: a chronology of sampling techniques and results. Revista Peruana de Entomologia, 32: 71-77.
Fernández, F. (2000). Avispas cazadoras de aranãs (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) de la región neotropical. Biota Colombiana. 1: 3-24.
Fittkau, E.J. & Klinge, H. (1973). On biomass and trophic structure of the central amazonian rain forest ecosystem. Biotropica. 5: 2-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2989676
Fowler, H. G., Forti, C.L., Brandão, C.R.F., Delabie, J.H.C. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (1991). Ecologia Nutricional de Formigas. In A.R. Panizzi & J.R. Parra (Eds.), Ecologia nutricional de insetos e suas implicações no manejo de pragas (pp. 131-223). São Paulo: Manole.
Goodbrod, J.R., & Goff, M.L. (1990). Effects of larval population density on rates of development and interactions between two species of Chrysomya (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in laboratory culture. Journal of Medical Entomology, 27: 338-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/27.3.338
Gullan, P. J. & Cranston, P.S. (2008). Os insetos: um resumo de entomologia. São Paulo: Roca, 480 p.
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
Hunt, J. H. (1974). Temporal activity patterns in two competing ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche, 81: 237-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/1974/72059
Kaspari, M. (2000). A primer on ant ecology. In D. Agosti, J.D. Majer, L.E. Alonso & T.R. Schultz (Eds.), Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. (pp. 9-24). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Levings, S.C. (1983). Seasonal, annual and among-site variation in the ground ant community of a deciduous tropical forest: some causes of patchy species distributions. Ecological Monographs, 53: 435-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1942647
Longino, J.T. (2003). The Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae) of Costa Rica. Zootaxa, 151: 1-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.151.1.1
Longino, J.T., Coddington, J. & Colwell, R.K. (2002). The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology, 83: 689-702. doi: org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0689:TAFOAT]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0689:TAFOAT]2.0.CO;2
Marques, G.D.V. & Del-Claro, K. (2006). The Ant Fauna in a Cerrado area: The Influence of Vegetation Structure and Seasonality (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 47: 235-252.
Moretti. T. C., Giannotti, E., Thyssen, P.J., Solis, D.R. & Godoy, W.A.C. (2011). Bait and habitat preferences, and temporal variability of social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) attracted to vertebrate carrion. Journal Medical Entomology, 48: 1069-1075. doi: 10.1603/ME11068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/ME11068
Moutinho, P. R. S. (1991). Note on foraging activity and diet of two Pheidole Westwood species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in an area of “shrub canga” vegetation in Amazonian Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 51: 403-406.
Oliveira-Costa, J. (2003). Entomologia Forense: quando os insetos são vestígios: São Paulo. Millennium, 257p.
Oliveira-Costa, J. A (2008). Entomologia Forense: quando os insetos são os vestígios. São Paulo. Millenium, 420p.
Parr, C.L. & Gibb, H. (2012). The discovery-dominance trade-off is the exception, rather than the rule. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81: 233-241. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01899.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01899.x
Petal, J. (1978). The role of ants in Ecosystems. In M.V, Brain. (Eds.), Production Ecology of Ants and Termites (pp. 293-325). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Pearce-Duvet, J.M.C. & Feener Junior, D.H. (2010). Resource discovery in ant communities: do food type and quantity matter? Ecological Entomology, 35: 549-556. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01214.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01214.x
Pujol-Luz, J. R., Arantes, L. C. & Constantino, R. (2008). Cem anos da entomologia forense no Brasil (1908-2008). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 52: 485-492. doi: org/10.1590/S0085-56262008000400001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262008000400001
Rafael, J.A., Melo, G.A.R., Carvalho, C.J.B., Casari, S.A. & Constantino, R. (2012). Insetos do Brasil: Diversidade e Taxonomia. Ribeirão Preto: Holos, 810 p.
Sih, A. (1982 a) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, notonecta-hoffmanni. Ecology. 63: 786-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936799
Sih, A. (1982. b) Optimal patch use: variation in selective pressure for efficient foraging. American Naturalist, 120: 666-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/284019
Souza, A. S. B., Kirst, F.D. & Krüger, R.F. (2008). Insects of forensic importance from Rio Grande do Sul state in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 52: 641-646. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262008000400016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262008000400016
Souza, A.M. & Linhares, A.X. (1997). Diptera and Coleoptera of potential forensic importance in southeastern Brazil: relative abundance and seasonality. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 11: 8-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1997.tb00284.x
Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 262 p.
Stork, N.E. (1991). The composition of the arthropod fauna of Bornean lowland rain forest trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 7: 161-180. doi: /10.1017/S0266467400005319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400005319
Triplehorn, C.A. & Jonnson, N.F. (2011). Estudo dos Insetos. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 808 p.
Veloso, H. P., Rangel-Filho, A.L.R. & Lima, J.C.A. (1991). Classificação da vegetação brasileira adaptada a um sistema universal. São Paulo: IBGE, 24 p.
Weber, N.A. (1972). Gardening Ants: The Attines. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 146p.
Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 562 p.
Zavatini, J.A. (1992). Dinâmica climática no Mato Grosso do Sul. Geografia, 17: 65-91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociobiology is a diamond open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
eISSN 2447-8067
