Construal, mesclagem e intersubjetividade: usos metafóricos de "gosto" e "sabor"

Auteurs

  • Lilian Vieira Ferrari UFRJ/DEPARTAMENTO DE LINGUÍSTICA E FILOLOGIA

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.13102/cl.v26iEspecial.12305

Mots-clés :

Metáfora. Construal. Intersubjetividade.

Résumé

Este trabalho adota a perspectiva teórica da Linguística Cognitiva, integrando conceitos relacionados à Teoria da Metáfora Conceptual (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980), à Teoria dos Espaços Mentais (Fauconnier, 1994,1997; Fauconnier e Turner, 2002), à Gramática Cognitiva (1987, 1991, 2000, 2008) e à Semântica de Frames (Fillmore, 1977, 1982, 1985), para análise semântico-pragmática dos usos metafóricos dos termos “gosto” e “sabor” em dados de uso do português brasileiro. Esses usos são, ainda, analisados em termos de intersubjetividade, na medida em que envolvem a coordenação cognitiva do acesso ao processo epistêmico de mesclagem conceptual, constituindo-se como um fenômeno comunicativo que envolve falante e ouvinte(s), mas também pessoas em geral (Verhagen, 2005, 2015). A metáfora mais frequente nos dados foi EVENTO É ALIMENTO, envolvendo instanciações com eventos esportivos, políticos e festivos. Esses usos metafóricos estabelecem processos de mesclagem conceptual cuja estrutura emergente integra um Sujeito Experienciador e um Objeto Experienciado (no caso, um alimento), no domínio-fonte, e os eventos mencionados, no domínio-alvo, elaborando o construal estabelecido em relação aos usos literais desses termos. Os resultados indicam que os usos metafóricos de “gosto” colocam em proeminência a experiência dos sujeitos envolvidos - atletas/ torcedores, políticos/eleitores, participantes de celebrações  -, enquanto “sabor” destaca as características   dos resultados alcançados - vitória/empate/derrota em competições esportivas, resultados de eleições/propostas políticas, e características de eventos festivos. Por fim, esses usos são intersubjetivos, na medida em que envolvem coordenação cognitiva não apenas entre falante e ouvinte(s), mas também em relação ao grupo social mais amplo, para acesso ao processo epistêmico na construção do significado metafórico.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Métriques

Chargements des métriques ...

Références

DANCYGIER, B.; SWEETSER, E. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

DUCROT, O. Slovenian lectures: argumentative semantics/conferences slovenes: semantiques argumentatives, ed. Igor Zagar. Ljubljana: ISH Institut humanisticne studije Ljubljana, 1996.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

FAUCONNIER, G e TURNER, M. Conceptual blending and the mind´s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

FERRARI, L. Ponto de vista e (inter)subjetividade: frames alternativos em “gosto” e “sabor”. In: Cavalcante, S.; Gabriel, R.; Moura, H. (Org.). Cognição e cultura; estudos em interface. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2021. p. 157-179.

FERRARI, L.; SWEETSER, E. Subjectivity and upwards projection in mental space structure. In Dancygier, B.; Sweetser, E. (Eds). Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014, p. 47-68.

FILLMORE, C. Scenes-and-frame semantics. In Zampolli, A. (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977. p. 55-81.

FILLMORE, C. Fillmore, C. Frame semantics, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, Seoul: Hanshin Pubishing, 1982. p. 111-137.

FILLMORE, C. Frames and the semantics of understanding, Quaderni diSemantica, 6. 1985. p. 222–54.

GEERAERTS, Dirk. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

LAKOFF, George G; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1980.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Stanford University Press, 1987.

LANGACKER, R. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1990. p.5-38.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive applications. Standford CA: Stanford University Press,1991.

LANGACKER, R. Grammar and Conceptualization (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2000.

LANGACKER, R. Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Nova York: Oxford University Press. 2008.

LANGACKER, R. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SOARES DA SILVA, Augusto. Introduction. In: Soares da Silva, A. (ed.) Figurative language; intersubjectivity and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021, p. 1-15

VERHAGEN, A. Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005

VERHAGEN, A. Grammar and cooperative communication. in: Dąbrowska, E. &

Dagmar Divjak (eds.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter

Mouton, 2015, p. 232-252.

VERHAGEN, A. Intersubjectivity. In Wen, X., Sinha, C. (eds), Cambridge Encyclopedia of Cognitive Linguistics (forthcoming).

DANCYGIER, B.; SWEETSER, E. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

DUCROT, O. Slovenian lectures: argumentative semantics/conferences slovenes: semantiques argumentatives, ed. Igor Zagar. Ljubljana: ISH Institut humanisticne studije Ljubljana, 1996.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

FAUCONNIER, G e TURNER, M. Conceptual blending and the mind´s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

FERRARI, L. Ponto de vista e (inter)subjetividade: frames alternativos em “gosto” e “sabor”. In: Cavalcante, S.; Gabriel, R.; Moura, H. (Org.). Cognição e cultura; estudos em interface. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2021. p. 157-179.

FERRARI, L.; SWEETSER, E. Subjectivity and upwards projection in mental space structure. In Dancygier, B.; Sweetser, E. (Eds). Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014, p. 47-68.

FILLMORE, C. Scenes-and-frame semantics. In Zampolli, A. (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977. p. 55-81.

FILLMORE, C. Fillmore, C. Frame semantics, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, Seoul: Hanshin Pubishing, 1982. p. 111-137.

FILLMORE, C. Frames and the semantics of understanding, Quaderni diSemantica, 6. 1985. p. 222–54.

GEERAERTS, Dirk. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

LAKOFF, George G; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1980.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Stanford University Press, 1987.

LANGACKER, R. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1990. p.5-38.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive applications. Standford CA: Stanford University Press,1991.

LANGACKER, R. Grammar and Conceptualization (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2000.

LANGACKER, R. Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Nova York: Oxford University Press. 2008.

LANGACKER, R. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SOARES DA SILVA, Augusto. Introduction. In: Soares da Silva, A. (ed.) Figurative language; intersubjectivity and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021, p. 1-15

VERHAGEN, A. Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005

VERHAGEN, A. Grammar and cooperative communication. in: Dąbrowska, E. &

Dagmar Divjak (eds.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter

Mouton, 2015, p. 232-252.

VERHAGEN, A. Intersubjectivity. In Wen, X., Sinha, C. (eds), Cambridge Encyclopedia of Cognitive Linguistics (forthcoming).

DANCYGIER, B.; SWEETSER, E. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

DUCROT, O. Slovenian lectures: argumentative semantics/conferences slovenes: semantiques argumentatives, ed. Igor Zagar. Ljubljana: ISH Institut humanisticne studije Ljubljana, 1996.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

FAUCONNIER, G e TURNER, M. Conceptual blending and the mind´s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

FERRARI, L. Ponto de vista e (inter)subjetividade: frames alternativos em “gosto” e “sabor”. In: Cavalcante, S.; Gabriel, R.; Moura, H. (Org.). Cognição e cultura; estudos em interface. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2021. p. 157-179.

FERRARI, L.; SWEETSER, E. Subjectivity and upwards projection in mental space structure. In Dancygier, B.; Sweetser, E. (Eds). Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014, p. 47-68.

FILLMORE, C. Scenes-and-frame semantics. In Zampolli, A. (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977. p. 55-81.

FILLMORE, C. Fillmore, C. Frame semantics, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, Seoul: Hanshin Pubishing, 1982. p. 111-137.

FILLMORE, C. Frames and the semantics of understanding, Quaderni diSemantica, 6. 1985. p. 222–54.

GEERAERTS, Dirk. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

LAKOFF, George G; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1980.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Stanford University Press, 1987.

LANGACKER, R. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1990. p.5-38.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive applications. Standford CA: Stanford University Press,1991.

LANGACKER, R. Grammar and Conceptualization (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2000.

LANGACKER, R. Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Nova York: Oxford University Press. 2008.

LANGACKER, R. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SOARES DA SILVA, Augusto. Introduction. In: Soares da Silva, A. (ed.) Figurative language; intersubjectivity and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021, p. 1-15

VERHAGEN, A. Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005

VERHAGEN, A. Grammar and cooperative communication. in: Dąbrowska, E. &

Dagmar Divjak (eds.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter

Mouton, 2015, p. 232-252.

VERHAGEN, A. Intersubjectivity. In Wen, X., Sinha, C. (eds), Cambridge Encyclopedia of Cognitive Linguistics (forthcoming).

DANCYGIER, B.; SWEETSER, E. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

DUCROT, O. Slovenian lectures: argumentative semantics/conferences slovenes: semantiques argumentatives, ed. Igor Zagar. Ljubljana: ISH Institut humanisticne studije Ljubljana, 1996.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

FAUCONNIER, G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

FAUCONNIER, G e TURNER, M. Conceptual blending and the mind´s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

FERRARI, L. Ponto de vista e (inter)subjetividade: frames alternativos em “gosto” e “sabor”. In: Cavalcante, S.; Gabriel, R.; Moura, H. (Org.). Cognição e cultura; estudos em interface. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2021. p. 157-179.

FERRARI, L.; SWEETSER, E. Subjectivity and upwards projection in mental space structure. In Dancygier, B.; Sweetser, E. (Eds). Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014, p. 47-68.

FILLMORE, C. Scenes-and-frame semantics. In Zampolli, A. (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977. p. 55-81.

FILLMORE, C. Fillmore, C. Frame semantics, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, Seoul: Hanshin Pubishing, 1982. p. 111-137.

FILLMORE, C. Frames and the semantics of understanding, Quaderni diSemantica, 6. 1985. p. 222–54.

GEERAERTS, Dirk. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

LAKOFF, George G; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1980.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Stanford University Press, 1987.

LANGACKER, R. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1990. p.5-38.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive applications. Standford CA: Stanford University Press,1991.

LANGACKER, R. Grammar and Conceptualization (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2000.

LANGACKER, R. Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. Nova York: Oxford University Press. 2008.

LANGACKER, R. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SOARES DA SILVA, Augusto. Introduction. In: Soares da Silva, A. (ed.) Figurative language; intersubjectivity and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021, p. 1-15

VERHAGEN, A. Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005

VERHAGEN, A. Grammar and cooperative communication. in: Dąbrowska, E. &

Dagmar Divjak (eds.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter

Mouton, 2015, p. 232-252.

VERHAGEN, A. Intersubjectivity. In Wen, X., Sinha, C. (eds), Cambridge Encyclopedia of Cognitive Linguistics (forthcoming).

Téléchargements

Publiée

2026-01-10

Comment citer

Vieira Ferrari, L. (2026). Construal, mesclagem e intersubjetividade: usos metafóricos de "gosto" e "sabor". A Cor Das Letras, 26(Especial), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.13102/cl.v26iEspecial.12305