Butterflies of the Pituaçu Metropolitan Park, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

Authors

  • Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos Universidade Federal da Bahia – Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biomonitoramento – Rua Barão de Geremoabo, s/n – Ondina – CEP: 40170-290 – Salvador – Bahia, Brasil.
  • Elaine Cristina Cambui Barbosa Universidade Federal da Bahia – Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biomonitoramento – Rua Barão de Geremoabo, s/n – Ondina – CEP: 40170-290 – Salvador – Bahia, Brasil.
  • Marcelo Cesar Lima Peres Universidade Federal da Bahia – Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Biomonitoramento – Rua Barão de Geremoabo, s/n – Ondina – CEP: 40170-290 – Salvador – Bahia; Universidade Católica de Salvador, Inst. de Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Ecologia e Conservação Animal, Av. Professor Pinto de Aguiar, 2589, Pituaçu, 41.740-090, Salvador, Bahia, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13102/scb8005

Abstract

The Pituaçu Metropolitan Park (PMP) represents one of the few protected areas in the city of Salvador, representing an important refuge for fauna and flora that are not associated with urban areas. In this sense, the present study represents the first attempt to provide information about the fauna of butterflies associated with urban forest remaining in Salvador. Samples were carried out from November 2002 to April 2003 for three consecutive days of each month, using as methods of capture the entomological net and trap of fermented fruit. We caught a total of 319 individuals belonging to 70 species after a collect effort of more than 324 hours, the most representative family in terms of richness was Nymphalidae. Although our results suggest that the fauna of the PMP captured during our study consists largely of generalist species, it is very important to emphasize this, because the area represents one of the few urban forest remaining protected in the city of Salvador. We suggest the management by the planting of native plant species that serve as food resources for adults and larvae of butterflies and restoration of open areas as measures for the maintenance of butterfly communities of PMP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blair RB & AE Launer. 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol. Cons. 80(1): 113-125.

Bolger D, A Suarez, K Crooks, S Morrison & T Case. 2000. Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in Southern California: area, age, and edge effects. Ecol. Appl. 10(4): 1230-1248.

Brown JR KS. 1991. Conservation of Neotropical environments: insects as indicators, p. 349-404. In: NM Collins & JA Thomas (ed.). The Conservation of insects and their habitats. London: Academic Press.

Brown JR KS. 1992. Borboletas da Serra do Japi: diversidade, habitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal, p. 142-186. In: LPC Morellato (org.). História natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservacão de uma área florestada no sudeste do Brasil. Campinas: UNICAMP.

Brown JR KS. 1997. Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of Neotropical Forests: insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. J. Ins. Cons. 1(1): 25-42.

Brown JR KS & AVL Freitas. 1999. Reino Animalia: Ordem Lepidoptera, p. 225-243. In: CRF Brandão & EM Cancello (orgs.). Biodiversidade do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil: síntese do conhecimento ao final do século XX, invertebrados terrestres. São Paulo: FAPESP.

Brown JR KS & AVL Freitas. 2000a. Diversidade de lepidóptera em Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo. Bol. Mus. Biol. Mello Leitão 11(12): 71-118.

Brown JR KS & AVL Freitas. 2000b. Atlantic Forest butterflies indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32(4B): 934-956.

Brown JR KS & AVL Freitas. 2003. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: structure, environment correlates, and conservation. J. Ins. Cons. 6(15): 217-231.

CONDER. 2008. Disponível em <http://www.conder.ba.gov.br/informs/institucional.asp>.

DeVries PJ. 1987. The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history, Volume I: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press.

DeVries PJ, D Murray & R Lande. 1997. Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruit-feeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62(3): 343-364.

DeVries PJ, TR Walla & HF Greeney. 1999. Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68(33): 333-353.

DeVries PJ & TR Walla. 2001. Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74(1): 1-15.

Dias FJK, VI Silva da Silva, LGPA Aguiar & CM Menezes. 2007. Levantamento preliminar da flora vascular do Parque Metropolitano de Pituaçú, Salvador, Bahia. In: X Semana de Mobilização Científica. Anais... Salvador: Universidade Católica do Salvador.

Fortunato L & A Ruszczyk. 1997. Comunidades de lepidopteros frugívoros em áreas verdes urbanas e extraurbanas de Uberlândia, MG. Rev. Bras. Biol. 57(1): 79-87.

Frankie GW & LE Ehler. 1978. Ecology of insects in urban environments. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 23: 367-387.

Freitas AVL, RB Fracini & KS Brown Jr. 2003. Insetos como indicadores ambientais, p. 125-151. In: L Cullen, R Rudran & C Valladare-Pádua (eds.). Métodos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre Curitiba: Ed. UFPR, Fundação Boticário de Proteção a Natureza.

IBAMA. 2008. Disponível em <http://www.ibama.gov.br/siucweb/infogeral.html>.

IBGE. 2008. Centro Demográfico 2000. Resultado do universo Malha Municipal, 1997. IBGE.

McIntyre NE. 2000. Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 93:825-835.

McIntyre NE, J Rango, WF Fagan & SH Faeth. 2001. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Land. Urb. Plan. 52: 257-274.

Pearson DL. 1994. Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assesment of biodiversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 345(B): 75-79.

Pickett STA, ML Cadenasso & JM Grove. 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 127-57.

Pickett STA & ML Cadenasso. 2006. Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore ecosystem study. Aust. J. Ecol. 31(2): 114 -125.

Robbins RK & PA Opler. 1996. Butterfly diversity and a preliminary comparison with bird and mammal diversity, p. 69-82. In: DE Wilson, ML Reaka-Kudla & EO Wilson (eds). Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.

Rodrigues JJS, KS Brown jr & A Ruszczyk. 1993. Resources and conservation of Neotropical butterflies in urban forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 64: 3-9.

Ruszczyk A. 1986a. Hábitos alimentares de borboletas adultas e sua adaptabilidade ao ambiente urbano. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 46(2): 419-427.

Ruszczyk A. 1986b. Ecologia urbana de borboletas, I – O gradiente de urbanização e a fauna de Porto Alegre, RS. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 46(4): 675-688.

Ruszczyk A. 1986c. Ecologia urbana de borboletas, II – Papilionidae, Pieridae e Nymphalidae em Porto Alegre, RS. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 46(4): 689-706.

Ruszczyk A & AM Araujo. 1992 Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J. Lepid. Soc. 46: 255–264.

Santos AJ. 2003. Estimativas de riqueza em espécies, p. 19-41. In: L Cullen Jr, C Valladares-Padua & R Rudran (eds.). Métodos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre Curitiba: Ed. UFPR, Fundação Boticário de Proteção a Natureza.

Tyler HA, KS Brown Jr & KH Wilson. 1994. Swallowtail butterflies of the Americas. A study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics, and conservation. Gainesville: Scientific Publishers Inc.

UCSal. 1992. Avaliação dos impactos ambientais decorrentes da implantação do plano diretor campus – Pituaçu, Salvador, Ba. Salvador: UCSal.

Published

2009-09-30

How to Cite

Vasconcelos, R. N. de ., Barbosa, E. C. C., & Peres, M. C. L. (2009). Butterflies of the Pituaçu Metropolitan Park, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. SITIENTIBUS série Ciências Biológicas, 9(2/3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.13102/scb8005

Issue

Section

Artigos